On 13/02/2008, at 2:13 PM, Jake MacMullin wrote:
I don't know if this has been aswered yet as for some reason this
thread is a bit messed up for me - I don't have the original
question...
But, in answer to the broader question of "what's the WO idiom" for
avoiding tags within tags? Someth
Hi,
I don't know if this has been aswered yet as for some reason this thread is a
bit messed up for me - I don't have the original question...
But, in answer to the broader question of "what's the WO idiom" for avoiding
tags within tags? Something new in 5.4 that I think is great is the abilit
or
ms
On Feb 12, 2008, at 5:06 PM, Paulo Filipe Andrade wrote:
Just FYI,
You could also use addStylesheetResourceInHead in ERXWOContext if
you don't have access to the of your page. Namely, if you're
building a subcomponent.
Paulo Andrade
On Nov 4, 2007, at 4:21 AM, Paul Hoadley wrot
Just FYI,
You could also use addStylesheetResourceInHead in ERXWOContext if you
don't have access to the of your page. Namely, if you're
building a subcomponent.
Paulo Andrade
On Nov 4, 2007, at 4:21 AM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 03/11/2007, at 7:33 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 27/10/2007,
On 26 Oct 2007, at 12:21, Anjo Krank wrote:
IIRC, you just set:
wo.wosystemroot=/some/place/or/other
where /some/place/or/other/Library/Frameworks/ has all the WO stuff
in it.
Now taking that into account and based on the instructions @ http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WOL/T
On 07/11/2007, at 1:52 AM, David Koski wrote:
Check out:
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/MacOSXServer/Reference/
WO54_Reference/com/webobjects/appserver/parser/package-summary.html
In particular the WOAssociationFactory part. This would allow you
to write:
...
etc.
Check out:
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/MacOSXServer/Reference/WO54_Reference/com/webobjects/appserver/parser/package-summary.html
In particular the WOAssociationFactory part. This would allow you to
write:
...
etc. You can create your own association scheme
On 03/11/2007, at 7:33 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 27/10/2007, at 5:50 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
2) Tags inside of tags (>">). This is EVIL. The WOLips validator has also been yelling at
you about this for months now, and that was very intentional. If
you listened to it, you're in a much bet
On 03.11.2007, at 03:03, Paul Hoadley wrote:
As an aside to the main thread, what's the WO idiom for getting
around this? While WOLips accepts this:
(where myCSS refers to a WOResourceURL), and it builds and runs, it
makes the XML purist inside me cringe. JSP, for example, has the
js
Hi!
I use WOGenericContainer to avoid that. Just put "link" in the
elementName binding, and create bindings for everything else. On
pre-5.4, I always used the Container, because it would generate a
close tag, needed to be XHTML compliant. 5.4 seems to be fully XHTML,
so I suppose the WO
Hello Paul;
As an aside to the main thread, what's the WO idiom for getting
around this?While WOLips accepts this:
Have a look at "WOGenericElement" and "WOGenericContainer".
cheers.
___
Andrew Lindesay
technology : www.lindesay.co.nz
business : www.silvereye.co.nz
__
On 27/10/2007, at 5:50 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
2) Tags inside of tags (>">). This is EVIL. The WOLips validator has also been yelling at
you about this for months now, and that was very intentional. If
you listened to it, you're in a much better position for 5.4. There
is no automatic fi
Mike,
As one of the original EOGenerator developers, I was wondering if you could
provide me with any more details about the EOGenerator replacement. For
instance, I presume that the template language is not compatible with ours,
but does offer the same features? I'm composing a official stateme
I wasn't very clear -- I'm with you on this (though honestly this
is actually identical to OGNL except that WOOGNL requires the
leading "~".
... and the surrounding quotes, no? And, thus escaping quotes within
the expression.
Actually, no. One of the changes I made a while back to Wonder's
Hi there,
On 29/10/2007, at 10:28 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
Personally I find creating a simple groovy expression in your wod
binding cleaner looking than WOOgnl.
e.g.,
SomeDiv : WOGenericContainer {
<>
omitTags = hasFoo && hasBar;
}
I wasn't very clear -- I'm with you on th
Personally I find creating a simple groovy expression in your wod
binding cleaner looking than WOOgnl.
e.g.,
SomeDiv : WOGenericContainer {
<>
omitTags = hasFoo && hasBar;
}
I wasn't very clear -- I'm with you on this (though honestly this is
actually identical to OGNL exc
On 29/10/2007, at 10:42 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
2) Tags inside of tags (">). This is EVIL. The WOLips validator has also
been yelling at you about this for months now, and that was very
intentional. If you listened to it, you're in a much better
position for 5.4. There is no automatic fi
2) Tags inside of tags (>">). This is EVIL. The WOLips validator has also been yelling at
you about this for months now, and that was very intentional. If
you listened to it, you're in a much better position for 5.4.
There is no automatic fix for this ... In fact, I would not be
surpris
On 27/10/2007, at 6:20 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
Am 26.10.2007 um 22:00 schrieb Mike Schrag:
Is there a recommended migration route from 5.3 style wod/html
to 5.4 html ? is it a case of changing each and every component
by hand ?
At the moment it's really an issue of testing and converting by
Awesome! Thanks ... that worked perfectly!!
Cheers,
Michael.
On 28-Oct-07, at 2:02 PM, Art Isbell wrote:
On Oct 28, 2007, at 6:31 AM, Michael Halliday wrote:
Okay ... wotaskd is happy now, but apache doesn't seem to be
handling the requests correctly. I just get a 403 Forbidden
error.
On Oct 28, 2007, at 8:02 AM, Art Isbell wrote:
On Oct 28, 2007, at 6:31 AM, Michael Halliday wrote:
Okay ... wotaskd is happy now, but apache doesn't seem to be
handling the requests correctly. I just get a 403 Forbidden
error. Can anyone tell me exactly how they have their httpd.conf
s
On Oct 28, 2007, at 6:31 AM, Michael Halliday wrote:
Okay ... wotaskd is happy now, but apache doesn't seem to be
handling the requests correctly. I just get a 403 Forbidden error.
Can anyone tell me exactly how they have their httpd.conf setup? Do
you simply need to add the following in
Okay ... wotaskd is happy now, but apache doesn't seem to be handling
the requests correctly. I just get a 403 Forbidden error. Can anyone
tell me exactly how they have their httpd.conf setup? Do you simply
need to add the following include at the end like with 1.3:
Include /System/Libra
okay yeah, for some reason the upgrade to Leopard switched the
JavaVM versions on me ... something to watch out for. I hate
upgrades ... didn't have enough space for an archive & install :(
Cheers,
Michael
On 28-Oct-07, at 11:56 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
It looks like you're running it
It looks like you're running it with 1.4 and it's build with 1.5.
err.. build = built
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subsc
It looks like you're running it with 1.4 and it's build with 1.5.
On Oct 28, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Michael Halliday wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm just curious how others have configured apache on Leopard client
to run in non-direct connect mode? I've tried adding the following
line to my apache2.2 ht
Hey guys,
I'm just curious how others have configured apache on Leopard client
to run in non-direct connect mode? I've tried adding the following
line to my apache2.2 httpd.conf:
Include /System/Library/WebObjects/Adaptors/Apache2.2/apache.conf
It appears though there is a bug in wotaskd
Heh, feel no remorse; I invited that. Besides, what the heck are
you doing answering email at 7:00 AM on Saturday??? Just can't keep
those fingers off the keyboard?
It's called "sleeping 30 mins the previous night" ... I crashed early
last night and the next thing I know I'm awake at 5am toda
On Oct 27, 2007, at 7:01 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
You and your lucky GMT+10 :) Now that Leopard is officially
released, I can actually comment on some of these things. I can't
I wonder what I was going to say in the end of this sentence :)
"I can't " "... wait to get Leopard"? "... find m
On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:18 PM, Art Isbell wrote:
I am breaking various rules about not making more than one change
simultaneously by moving from Apple WO tools to Eclipse (3.2.2 -
too timid to move to 3.3.1 yet :-)
Probably you will be more successful using 3.3.1/wolips nightly ...
3.2.2 w
You and your lucky GMT+10 :) Now that Leopard is officially
released, I can actually comment on some of these things. I can't
I wonder what I was going to say in the end of this sentence :) "I
can't " "... wait to get Leopard"? "... find my keys"? Who
knows :)
The Shadow knows... (
However, its treatment of Mike's "lazy tags" wasn't ideal from my
perspective.
WOLips in the 3.3.x builds makes this much better. In the 3.2.x
branch, I treated them all like a paragraph tag that you left off the
closing tag for. In 3.3.x it knows that some lazy tags really are
single tag
The error: "The method arrayByAddingObjectsFromArray
(NSArray) in the type NSArray is not
applicable for the arguments (NSArray)". Say what?!
An EOAttribute is an EOProperty!
This is a bug in 5.4 -- Wonder had this same bug in our generic form
of NS* originally, but it is fixed in Wonder.
Am 27.10.2007 um 04:18 schrieb Art Isbell:
[...]
http://www.foo.com/bar.css";
type="text/css" charset="utf-8" />
but I could not rewrite a script tag with no contents as:
http://www.foo.com/bar.js"; type="text/
javascript" charset="utf-8" />