On 6/30/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Igor just committed a maven archetype to our svn and we still have a
quickstart and examples project that seem a bit out of place for our
main distribution.
trunk/
archetypes/
jdk-1.4/
wicket-quickstart
jdk-1.5/
On 6/29/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We are on 1.3.1 now but i see there is a 1.4.0
and i have to use it anyway in another project (thats also using wicket)
so i could also upgrade wicket to 1.4.0
+0
Frank
On 6/28/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[x] I have checked the distribution and +1 its release
[ ] I haven't checked the distribution and +0 its release
[ ] I have checked the distribution and -1 its release because...
I will try to upload this to the mirroring site once we have
On 6/26/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because it is 1.1 ... Apache doesn't ship 1.1 (prohibits it).
But what does this mean to us? If we are allowed to ship ASL2 code which
includes ASL1.1 code aRat should at least mark the files as ASL1 or
something.
Frank
/me thinks it's
On 6/26/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[x] I checked the distribution, and I +1 the release of them
Small (non-blocking) thing:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/wicket/releases/wicket-1.3.0-beta2/README?view=co
says
"All necessary dependencies are located in the /lib
On 6/24/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/24/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does Infra need to involved in domain transfers?
Yes, but that is another issue according to me. We can resolve that
seperately.
Ok fine.
Rest looks fine to me as well.
Frank
On 6/24/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[1] is of course: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1260
Of course ;-)
Frank
On 6/24/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please review if I have misspelled something, or if there is something
missing.
Does Infra need to involved in domain transfers?
Frank
On 6/24/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IRequestCycleFactory and ISessionFactory annoy the hell out of me. We
simplified how they are used a bit in 1.3, but imho, I think we should
just ditch them all together in favor of simply two factory methods in
application. Factory method n
On 6/19/07, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As subject. See other thread for discussion.
[x] Yes, rename AjaxSubmitButton to AjaxButton, leaving behind a
@deprecated subclass for backwards-compatibility.
[ ] No, that's a crazy idea. We're frozen for 1.3.0 and this sort of
stuff sho
On 6/18/07, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frank Bille wrote:
> Hey
>
> We could also rename AjaxSubmitButton into AjaxButton.
>
> Then we have:
> Button, ImageButton and AjaxButton (and AjaxFallbackButton)
>
> and
>
> SubmitLink and AjaxSubmitLink
Hey
We could also rename AjaxSubmitButton into AjaxButton.
Then we have:
Button, ImageButton and AjaxButton (and AjaxFallbackButton)
and
SubmitLink and AjaxSubmitLink
I don't know whats best, yet. It's just a surgestion now that we play with
names :)
Frank
On 6/18/07, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTEC
On 6/10/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As we only link to the file, and I don't want to go around trying to
find a new, correctly licensed file with good antecedents, I am going
to disable the explicit inclusion of our dependencies. Only the
wicket-examples WAR archive will keep
On 6/10/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[1]
http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-incubating-beta-2
That is of cause:
http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-incubating-beta2
Frank
ps. my comments later today if any. But Noe
Welcome :)
I wonder if code monkeys eats bananamen?
Frank
On 5/30/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Close observers to our graduation proposal would already have noticed
our newest member to the Wicket PPMC, but it is always a good time to
celebrate happy events:
Please join me
* Gwyn Evans
* Jonathan Locke
* Johan Compagner
* Juergen Donnerstag
* Igor Vaynberg
* Matej Knopp
* Janne Hietamäki
* Frank Bille Jensen
* Al Maw
* Jean-Baptiste Quenot
* Jan Blok
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FUR
On 5/4/07, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[x] Yes, propose Wicket for Graduation
Frank
+1 on that. And use EnumeratedType instead, so we can say
public AjaxEventBehavoir(ClientEvent event)
Frank
On 4/27/07, Timo Rantalaiho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Johan Compagner wrote:
> then you could maybe point us to a feature that was in 2.0 but is
overlooked
> by us
[x] Yes, ask the IPMC to ratify the 1.3.0-incubating-beta1 release
[ ] No, don't ask the IPMC
Stuff checked:
- *.jar/MANIFEST.MF - looks good (more complete with information)
- DISCLAIMER/NOTICE/LICENSE in META-INF in jar files (also sources.jarand
javadoc.jar)
- DISCLAIMER at all
-
I'm going through the release tonight.
Frank
On 4/24/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is a vote to release our first official incubator release into
the wild. The intent is to release Apache Wicket 1.3.0 beta1 to the
general Wicket community. Most API breaks are in, and we
On 4/20/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[x] Release wicket 1.2.6 regardless if these four issues are resolved
Frank
On 4/19/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ ] Apache Wicket XP Vista 2007
[x] Apache Wicket 2.0 (i.e. becomes our old 2.0 minus the c'tor change)
Frank
On 4/18/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[x] yes, switch them
[ ] no, don't switch them
Frank
On 4/16/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Of course, I haven't optimized/compressed animate.js, which Yahoo has
done for its scripts.
Sure. After only decompression yahoo is 44kb, which is much more that
animate which still isn't optimized.
But yahoo runs smother here (FF on wi
On 4/16/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But the size difference makes animator
better pick i think.
When I compare the sizes of whats loaded on the two pages it's:
Animate.js: 80kb
Yahoo: 70kb
Where the javascript part is
Animate.js: 23kb
Yahoo: 9kb + 4kb
So when Yahoo page lo
On 4/13/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Frank Bille:
> FYI, I have just made Dojo 1.3 being build in bamboo when
wicket-extensions
> 1.3 is build.
Just curious, why?
I saw that dojo depended on wicket/extensions 1.3 snapshot and thought "hey,
wouldn&#
FYI, I have just made Dojo 1.3 being build in bamboo when wicket-extensions
1.3 is build.
Frank
I only know scriptaculous and jquery+interface and haven't looked at moo.
But 24Kb for animate is quite interesting!
Frank
On 4/13/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
I have found a nice animation library that is not as big as
scriptaculous, in my opinion better than moo and
On 4/10/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/10/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Currently our core projects are referenced as 'Wicket [insert
> project]' in the pom's. One of the plus points of becoming an Apache
> project is
On 4/10/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Currently our core projects are referenced as 'Wicket [insert
project]' in the pom's. One of the plus points of becoming an Apache
project is the ability to use the Apache brand in the product name.
+1, since it will also avoid any prob
On 3/29/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/28nkjs
should work better (and goes directly to the tally)
Muuuch better :)
Frank
On 3/29/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[1] http://tinyurl.com/yoxea
Is it just me or is this link resolving to something like "
host.wallstreetcity.com"?
Frank
P.s. I like the text.
On 3/28/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[x] Yes release the damned thing already
Frank
P.s. I really think it's a cool distribution now. It's really well
structured and self-contained. If only every software distribution (also the
apache ones) were like this :)
IMO I think we should get this release to IPMC, not worrying about
functional issues. I know it takes Martijn quite a while to do a release
(Wicket *is* a big project with many subprojects so it will take some time
to release) and this release here is only for IPMC.
Comments below
On 3/26/07, J
On 3/26/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
[x] yes submit apache-wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha to the IPMC for
ratification
[ ] no, don't submit apache-wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha to the IPMC
Frank (binding)
k
[1]:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Wicket+1.3.0+incubating+alpha+1
On 3/26/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/25/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/25/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >- Why do we hav
On 3/25/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/25/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>- Why do we have NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, README and LICENSE on so many
> levels? (root of distribution, in src folder and then in all the
projects)
The
I have now had the time to look through the release in more detail. I
haven't found anything that would make me raise -1 on the release, but I
have found something which I think we should think about (unsorted list):
- zip/tgz Distribution:
- Why do we have NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, README and LICE
+1
Frank
On 3/24/07, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've backported Localizer, ResourceStreamLocator, ResourceFinder and
PropertiesFactory from 2.0 trunk. Compared to current 1.3 there are
some slight API changes though in my opinion no big ones. If one is
using any of these fea
I had the same problem. It is because you need to update maven dependencies
(archive etc.). Igor told me[1] that you can do:
mvn -U *whatever*
to do that.
Frank
[1]: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Build-failure-p9482860.html
On 3/24/07, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is th
On 3/23/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The goodies:
- the distribution:
http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/releases/wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha/dist
The two distributions are have different content. The zip file also contains
the tar.gz file in it's target folder. (Thats w
This is not my vote (yet), but just to inform you that I had created this
wiki page[1], to describe the legal aspect of the release. It's not
completed or up to date, but I will change it later today or tomorrow
morning, so we can use that we move on to IPMC.
Frank
[1]:
http://cwiki.apache.org/
+1
Frank
On 3/20/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Like the subject says.
Martijn
--
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframe
+1
Frank
On 3/19/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hibernate 3.2 has switched from using an int to a long for returntype of
their count queries. jpa also uses a long. so i figure its time to switch
idataprovider to the long as well so that it maps nicely. since we have
broken 1.3 a
On 3/18/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Close watchers of the svn logs may have noticed that I merged the
examples projects into one big examples project. This saves on build
time and of course on checking if the release is any good (3 artifacts
less to consider).
Very nice!
TED]> wrote:
we are doing that, but its not a public release
-igor
On 3/14/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 and I still think we should do a 1.3 release to IPMC "now"
>
> Frank
>
>
> On 3/15/07, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
+1 and I still think we should do a 1.3 release to IPMC "now"
Frank
On 3/15/07, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's been a lot of comment and discussion lately about the future
direction of Wicket, and the trunk/2.0 branch in particular.
We've done some hard thinking and we now have a
Where is wicket 1.3 builds anyway? They seem to be missing.
I still can't get 1.3 setup on local computer. I'm no maven shark, but it
looks like it's not building everything now from the parent:
http://papernapkin.org/pastebin/view/5032
Frank
On 3/14/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On 3/8/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/8/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, so
>
http://www.nabble.com/Maven-2-project-structure-with-wicket-parent-tf3175043.html#a8812638is
> still a problem?
Yep still a problem. But the biggest pro
On 3/8/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And you'll probably want to run the jdk-1.4 stuff using a 1.4 JDK.
Ok, so
http://www.nabble.com/Maven-2-project-structure-with-wicket-parent-tf3175043.html#a8812638is
still a problem?
But are you proposing that we structure our 1.x project
+1 on 1.3-beta1-incubating.
On 3/8/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this vote is to release 1.3beta
-igor
I think that we have some places in 1.3 where we shouldn't deprecate the
API. This is areas where the deprecation says "Will be removed/moved in 2.0".
I think it is a bit annoying to develop an application and suddenly find
that I can't get rid of some deprecation warnings because there is no
alte
n mind?
Martijn
On 3/4/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/4/07, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Regarding not including the ASF header in generated output, although
it
> > isn't required it's still a good idea to include
johan
On 3/3/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have created this issue because I'm not sure my email reached the
> mailing
> list:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-351
>
>
> On 3/3/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
On 3/2/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/1/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Someone needs to try running RAT on our codebase.
>
> Hey Frank, could you give that a go?
Yes, finally (Thx Igor). I'll look at it this weekend.
Ok it seems that they use a staight BSD license[1] as one of there dual
license licenses. So we should be ok, if we state in our NOTICE that we use
it under the BSD license.
Frank
[1]: http://manual.dojotoolkit.org/WikiHome/DojoDotBook/Book15
On 3/4/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 3/4/07, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Regarding not including the ASF header in generated output, although it
isn't required it's still a good idea to include it where feasible so
end users aren't confused about usage [1].
In my opinion it isn't a show stopper for this release,
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/wicket-examples/src/main/java/wicket/examples/preview/dojo.js?view=log
On 3/4/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Author: frankbille
> Date: Sun Mar 4 07:27:59 2007
> New Revision: 514405
>
On 3/3/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is! I changed it back for you (even though I didn't agree, but
that's how the voting works) after I changed the error message to
include instructions on how to turn it off.
.. and that is actually pretty nice. I have turned it of for a
ject in itself I guess.
Martijn
On 3/2/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/1/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Someone needs to try running RAT on our codebase.
> >
> > Hey Frank, could you give that a go?
>
>
>
I have created this issue because I'm not sure my email reached the mailing
list:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-351
On 3/3/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... and you reproduce the bug by doing:
1. Start quickstart, (duh)
2. Click on first link
... and you reproduce the bug by doing:
1. Start quickstart, (duh)
2. Click on first link
3. browser back
4. Click on first link again (or second link second link isn't
really part of the problem. Perhaps I should just have removed it)
Frank
On 3/3/07, Frank Bille &l
On 3/1/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Someone needs to try running RAT on our codebase.
Hey Frank, could you give that a go?
Yes, finally (Thx Igor). I'll look at it this weekend. Just so I/we don't
spend too much time on something which is not being released, is this the
p
On 2/28/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Eelco Hillenius:
> > I already have 1.4 compliance level in the project.
>
> That *and* in the libraries section you should set JRE system
> library to 'execution environment JSE-1.4 (JVM 1.4).
I have J2SE-1.4, but pointing to m
On 2/27/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ ] No, I object! Java 1.4 examples are the thing I live and die for
[x] Yes, make one examples project to rule them all...
... * and in the darkness bind them
*Frank*
*
Yes thats really good. But a link to the sources would be very good.
And we have to be careful not to make the examples too wide (visually).
Frank
On 2/26/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
looks very neat!
there is a com.apple import in the quickstartapplication that you might
wa
On 2/22/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
why dont we just remove PageLink altogether?
+1, remove the bastard :)
Frank
+1
On 2/20/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi team,
I'm about to finish porting the MockWebApplication and
WicketTester refactoring that happened in trunk to branch 1.x. Do
you all agree to break the API in branch 1.x WRT WicketTester?
BTW the wiki does not m
I don't have absolute positioning, so the calendar works just fine :)
Frank
On 2/19/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frank, you are using this new datepicker... how do you use it?
Eelco
On 2/19/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Filtered! So i couldn't see that
If it's a showstopper in 1.2 then +1
Frank
On 2/16/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
WicketPortletRequest#getParameterMap should really return a copy of
the parameters. Not doing that results in the bug described here:
http://www.nabble.com/portlet-bug-tf3239188.html
This looks
On 2/16/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 to have it on by default, but the stack trace should include
instructions
on turning it off and a message for users to email the stack trace.
best of both worlds, we get at least one stacktrace, they get instructions
on how to turn it off
On 2/12/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In general, @author tags and attributions are poison to ASF-style
collaboration, they are all about carving out niches in the code.
The ASF-style development is about tearing down niches and promoting
collaboration across an entire code
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Frank
On 2/12/07, Luca Botti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And sorry to anyone if it has been discussed before
On 2/8/07, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> On 2/8/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Finally.. I'm tired of all his patches :)
>
> meritocracy according to Wicket: when we get tired of your patches
> we'll add yo
+1 (binding)
Finally.. I'm tired of all his patches :)
Frank
On 2/8/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
Jean-Baptiste Quenot has been very helpful over an extended period by
providing patches, taking part in discussions on the lists and on
##wicket, and he and some of his
07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now available.
>
> Martijn
>
> On 2/4/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Another thing: Where is wicket-examples?
> >
> > Frank
> >
> >
> > On 2/4/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECT
I normally just copy the string from the console output of the unit test
(without the prefix)
Frank
On 2/5/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/5/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/5/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
&
On 2/5/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, maybe not :) I tried:
cssIgnore = new String[] {
"src/java/wicket/extensions/yui/calendar/assets/calendar.css"
};
"src/main/java/wicket/extensions/yui/calendar/
On 2/5/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So do
> I just instantiate the appropriate arrays (like cssIgnore) to mark
> these Yahoo files to be ignored?
Ok, ok, I should read first, than ask. Answer is yes.
Yes! :)
Frank
On 2/5/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martijn/ Frank, I think I got all the headers, notices and patch to
wicket-parent done ok and testing building the whole bunch. But if one
of you could double check please...
* You have included the license header test but not executed it?
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-compiler-plugin
1.4
1.4
perhaps, haven't tested it though?
Frank
On 2/5/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/5/07, Al
On 2/5/07, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frank Bille wrote:
> Yes I agree with Martijn. We really want to catch if any 1.5 stuff is
> in 1.4projects. But Al, if you can get maven to do that (forcing
> 1.4 in 1.4 projects) it would be nice. I don't know if maven can do
On 2/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-1
I have set this up so that I can run with jdk 1.4 and build the 1.4
projects *USING* only 1.4, and ONLY the 1.5 projects when I run using
1.5. This is to prevent any 1.5 stuff from entering our project.
Yes I agree with Martijn. We re
Another thing: Where is wicket-examples?
Frank
On 2/4/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [ ] Don't release, because...
> [x] Share these files with the greater public
>
Well... :o)
The artifa
On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ ] Don't release, because...
[x] Share these files with the greater public
Well... :o)
The artifacts looks "ok" since we don't release them as ASF endorsed. They
of cause lack the stuff we have been working on for 1.3.
One thing though
On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The file upload field test fails because it can't find the DTD file. I
think this is because the multimodule build keeps the startup
directory inside the wicket-parent folder.
We have talked about it before and I still have an outstanding
Hey all
I have been playing around with confluence and got this page created:
http://incubator.apache.org/wicket/roadmap.html
Do you think we should have such a page on our website (of cause the
icons+style should be fixed) or doesn't it make much sense?
Frank
P.s. the page is not linked to f
On 1/29/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PS. is 1.2.x already under the bamboo build umbrella?
>
Nope not yet. Let me add them.
http://www.wicketstuff.org/bamboo/browse/WICKET12X
Frank
On 1/29/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[x] yes, bug-b-gone my Wicket
[ ] no, I still have some critters to deal with
PS. is 1.2.x already under the bamboo build umbrella?
Nope not yet. Let me add them.
Frank
+1
Frank
On 1/28/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
we have way too many base classes that arent really useful.
we can remove AbstractModel and AbstractDetachableModel as they serve very
little purpose. especially ADM which introduces a bunch of garbage like
onattach/ondetach/isatta
On 1/23/07, Filippo Diotalevi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/22/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Our current Wicket release distribution consists of several zip files,
> one for each project. Each zip contains all the dependencies for that
> particular project, including the wi
On 1/22/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Questions:
- do we need to support ant builds for the source distribution?
-1
- do we need to supply all dependencies in the source and/or binary
distribution
Let's go maven2 and don't include dependencies in source distributions. I
On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this api is simply too fragile. any custom requesttarget impl has to call
this in order for it to be consistent, and if its not consistent its
useless.
+1 because of fragile api.
It's already in trunk. I'm more thinking about backporting the wickettester
change from trunk to 1.3.
But perhaps I will raise a vote to backport 496616 to 1.2.5. But it easy for
users to fix it them selves, by doing what I do on there instance of
WicketTester.
WDYT?
Frank
On 1/19/07, Jean-Bap
And perhaps get some subdomains for
build.wicketframework.org => http://81.17.46.170/bamboo
examples.wicketframework.org/1.2 => http://81.17.46.170/wicket12/
examples.wicketframework.org/1.3 => http://81.17.46.170/wicket13/
and so on.
Frank
On 1/18/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+1
On 1/17/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've got couple of modal window fixes for 1.2, can I commit it in?
-Matej
The problem is that if I run it on my machine I get 5 failing tests. On the
build machine it's 113 failing tests...
Frank
On 1/16/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mvn test?
Martijn
On 1/16/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/16/07, I
On 1/16/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://81.17.46.170/bamboo
Do you think I can get some rights on that one? I want to make sure the
tests run in maven as in eclipse.
Username: frankbille
Frank
On 1/16/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
now all the builds should go perfect :)
Talking about continuum? Where is it then?
Frank
On 1/13/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to fix the last test failure in branch 1.x
~jbq++
:o)
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
