Re: wicket-examples test broken again

ok the latest wicket examples do build now and is live: http://www.wicketstuff.org/wicket13/index.html compref should be a bit updated now because the page itself doesn't say that it is org.apache.wicket. components... and the pub example doesn't work i see, the image doesn't update. (cachi

Re: wicket-examples test broken again

i did some fixes But what i also needed to do is remove the jasper.jar from my build path at the moment that one was in the build path and i would run the AllTest jetty doesn't start up because it tries to create a jasper jsp servlet. after removing that and 3 changes the examples do run at my pl

Re: wicket-examples test broken again

* Eelco Hillenius: > If I remember correctly, Jean-Baptiste made a fix yesterday that > repaired the WordGeneratorTest from wicket-examples. After the > package rename changes it is broken again it seems. Rolling back > to the older version doesn't seem to fix it unfortunately. Any > idea Jean

Re: wicket-examples FormPage

If users can, they should try to migrate. If users have severe bugs in 1.2.x and they can't upgrade, we'll patch it, but it is something that first have to be voted for. For 1.3, see migration here: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migrate-13.html. For most people it should be a pretty easy fix, and

Re: wicket-examples FormPage

On 1/22/07, Sean Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I understand that Wicket 1.2.x is in maintenance mode. However, Wicket 1.2.4is the only version that has been deemed a production-ready release. really? i thought 1.2, 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.3 were also production ready...? Should users continu

Re: wicket-examples FormPage

I understand that Wicket 1.2.x is in maintenance mode. However, Wicket 1.2.4is the only version that has been deemed a production-ready release. Should users continue using Wicket 1.2.4 or should they move to the unreleased Wicket 1.3 codebase? Sean On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: wicket-examples FormPage

yes thats the one and no, afaik it will not. if you want it you can start a vote to have it included. just keep in mind it is already very time consuming for us to work on 2 branches, not to mentioned 3 -igor On 1/22/07, Sean Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Are you referring to WICKET-15

Re: wicket-examples FormPage

Are you referring to WICKET-156? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-156 Is this fix going to be added to the Wicket 1.2.5 release? Sean On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: it was a bug with wicket and is fixed in 1.3. it had to do with components/page not properl

Re: wicket-examples FormPage

it was a bug with wicket and is fixed in 1.3. it had to do with components/page not properly attaching/detaching during ajax requests. -igor On 1/22/07, Sean Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Was this a bug in the FormPage class or a bug in the wicket-1.2.4.jar? (I am trying to implement th

Re: wicket-examples FormPage

Was this a bug in the FormPage class or a bug in the wicket-1.2.4.jar? (I am trying to implement the same type of functionality in my own web application) Sean On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: that bug has been fixed already http://81.17.46.170/wicket13/ajax?wicket:bookm

Re: wicket-examples FormPage

ah, how could i forget our new domain! :) http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.FormPage On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: wicket-examples FormPage

that bug has been fixed already http://81.17.46.170/wicket13/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.FormPage -igor On 1/22/07, Sean Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I visited the FormPage on wicket-library.com and I'm not sure if its working correctly: http://www.wic

Re: wicket examples on www.wicket-library.com

lets see how stable our server is. It runs much more apps so it should go down earlier! johan On 1/19/07, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It only gets restartet once a day. Thats usually it. It is not available 100% that is true, but it is down only very few times. If anyone wan

Re: wicket examples on www.wicket-library.com

It only gets restartet once a day. Thats usually it. It is not available 100% that is true, but it is down only very few times. If anyone wants to spend some time on investigating why it is done, I'm more than happy to grant you access. Unfortunately I have only very little time right now. It is a

Re: wicket examples on www.wicket-library.com

we do need a domain for our dedicated box, using ip addr sucks -igor On 1/18/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Problem is that wicketframework.org points currently to sf.net, and I can't add subdomains without breaking the current wicketframework.org site. Perhaps we should als

Re: wicket examples on www.wicket-library.com

Problem is that wicketframework.org points currently to sf.net, and I can't add subdomains without breaking the current wicketframework.org site. Perhaps we should also host wicketframework.org on that box, and redirect traffic from sf.net site to our own box. Then this is possible. Please note

Re: wicket examples on www.wicket-library.com

And perhaps get some subdomains for build.wicketframework.org => http://81.17.46.170/bamboo examples.wicketframework.org/1.2 => http://81.17.46.170/wicket12/ examples.wicketframework.org/1.3 => http://81.17.46.170/wicket13/ and so on. Frank On 1/18/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: wicket examples on www.wicket-library.com

* Martijn Dashorst: > Why not download the examples yourself and run it locally? A better answer would be to take off the link to wicket-library.com, as it's not the first time that is it offline. -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/

Re: wicket examples on www.wicket-library.com

http://81.17.46.170/wicket13/ -igor On 1/18/07, Sean Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is the wicket-library web site offline? I am unable to view any of the examples: http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/upload I was plann

Re: wicket examples on www.wicket-library.com

Why not download the examples yourself and run it locally? Martijn On 1/18/07, Sean Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is the wicket-library web site offline? I am unable to view any of the examples: http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket

Re: wicket-examples compilation failure

On 12/18/06, Stefan Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Agh! Two typos! I mean Java 1.5.0_10. Yes... I had 1.5.0_06, and it didn't work; now I'm using the latest release (1.5.0_10-b3) and it's building correctly. Thanks everybody -- filippo

Re: wicket-examples compilation failure

Hi! This is strange - I don't get any compilation error in the wicket module, nor do I see any error in WebPage.java:169 or Loop.java:167: WebPage: public final HeaderContainer getHeaderContainer() { return (HeaderContainer)get(HtmlHeaderSectionHandler.HEADER_ID); } Loop: // Get item for

Re: wicket-examples compilation failure

On 12/18/06, Martin Benda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, wicket-examples 2.0 (trunk) module fails to compile using maven and standard javac compiler (however, eclipse compiler doesn't complain): Hello, the very same error is present in the main wicket module (in the trunk), so it is impossible

Re: wicket-examples compilation failure

Yes, the Eclipse and Sun compiler differ quite annoyingly in how they treat casts that have a generic component. Unfortunately this is not a setting. There are more differences. For example JRockit behaves weird around warnings for deprecated methods. Regards, Erik. Johan Compagner wrote:

Re: wicket-examples compilation failure

thx fix it. strange that compilers are that different. should be a setting then somewhere in eclipse. johan On 12/18/06, Martin Benda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, wicket-examples 2.0 (trunk) module fails to compile using maven and standard javac compiler (however, eclipse compiler doesn't c

Re: wicket-examples

But anyway are you willing/have enough rights to change the license to ASL? Else I will add them to NOTICE.txt Frank Yep. I'm the author, and I'm fine with doing that. Eelco

Re: Re: wicket-examples

On 11/13/06, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But anyway are you willing/have enough rights to change the license to ASL? Else I will add them to NOTICE.txt He's the original author, regardless of the quality :-). Move the code to the wicket namespace, and change to ASL. Or let Eelco do

Re: wicket-examples

On 11/13/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What about a file like this: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/wicket/trunk/wicket-examples/src/test/java/nl/openedge/util/jetty/JettyMonitorException.java?view=co Case of a stupid slip. I'll testify that in front of a jury :)

Re: wicket-examples

What about a file like this: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/wicket/trunk/wicket-examples/src/test/java/nl/openedge/util/jetty/JettyMonitorException.java?view=co Case of a stupid slip. I'll testify that in front of a jury :) Eelco

Re: wicket-examples

On 11/13/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That code was released with the BSD licence. I'm not sure how the ownership works; I wrote it for openedge/ topicus, but mostly in my spare time I believe. IMNAL either, but we should be ok. What about a file like this: http://svn.apache

Re: wicket-examples

The httpunit license is MIT or BSD type: http://httpunit.sourceforge.net/doc/license.html > src/test/java/nl/openedge/util/jetty (some files has a non-ASL license > header which I haven't looked through yet, and some has a short copyright > notice in Dutch) This one can be changed by either

Re: wicket-examples

On 11/13/06, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: src/test/java/com/meterware/httpunit (doesn't seem to be used, no license header at all) This was a fix for XML and/or JavaScript not being parsed correctly, iirc. The httpunit license is MIT or BSD type: http://httpunit.sourceforge.net/do