Let me also mention that the official webpage puts December 5 as the
submission deadline:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2021/Organise
best,
Alexander
On 11/2/2021 11:50 AM, Анатолій Гончаров wrote:
31st November??? I have no such day in my calendar.
вт, 2
Dear Lodewijk,
In order to answer your question, it would be useful to have information
on which diet was eventually implemented during WLM-2019 and 2020. Do
you have any such data?
An information on the banner diet during WLE-2021 would be even more
useful because all countries with a
paign" at the top. Unarchiving is included,
free of charge. :)
Thanks for your patience, and to all coordinators, keep up the good work!
Mahmoud & Stephen
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 12:30 AM Alexander Tsirlin <mailto:altsir...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear Mahmoud,
Thank you f
on responses from Alexey Baturin on those
PRs. Is he on this list?
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 4:22 PM Alexander Tsirlin <mailto:altsir...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear Lodewijk,
As for the status of Montage requests: I suggest that you start a
separate thread on that, and would like
process may happen before/after this tool is used.
Lodewijk
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:17 PM Alexander Tsirlin <mailto:altsir...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear Lodewijk,
We also intend to publish by default the settings of the montage
jury tool, and the number of photos in e
Dear Lodewijk,
We also intend to publish by default the settings of the montage jury
tool, and the number of photos in each round that the national
competitions have used. We're debating whether there should be an
opt-out for this year.
This is unrealistic, because jury process may involve
It does not seem like people are allowed to join this meeting
On 6/6/2020 7:03 PM, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga wrote:
The first session is happening now, join at
https://meet.google.com/vpq-rvzt-jpc
Etherpad link at https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WLM_2020_Office_Hours
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at
Dear Lodewijk,
Could you confirm what the main point of this discussion will be:
- whether to organize WLM-2020 under the current conditions? (as
Krishna's e-mail implies)
- or how to organize/improve WLM "next year" (regardless of the current
epidemic situation)?
If it is about the second
Dear Sandra,
Thank you for the explanations. However, I should mention that all WLM
organizers already have their small Structured Data, namely, lists of
monuments that contain all necessary information: region and city names,
coordinates, construction years, etc. One could think of feeding
Dear All,
We are happy to announce the Wikivoyage banner competition as part of
WLM-2018:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2018/banners
Same as last year, we invite the participants to convert their photos
into banner images used at Wikivoyage. These banner
est created. The recent file I
noticed was 봄이_온_수원_화성.jpg
Best,
Lodewijk
2017-01-30 17:06 GMT+01:00 Alexander Tsirlin
<altsir...@gmail.com <mailto:altsir...@gmail.com>>:
The WLM upload wizard adds the cc-by-sa-4.0 license
The WLM upload wizard adds the cc-by-sa-4.0 license automatically.
Therefore, it is hard to imagine that a WLM photo had no license. It
rather means that someone removed the license, and then someone else
deleted the file. Was it the case here?
Sincerely,
Alexander
On 30.01.2017 11:51,
dewijk
2016-09-17 8:58 GMT+02:00 Alexander Tsirlin <altsir...@gmail.com
<mailto:altsir...@gmail.com>>:
Rather than complaining to the process could you please for once
think that this is your project too and everyone in this together?
It is not my project. Like many
/strain on the reviewers too.
Best,
Lodewijk
2016-09-17 8:58 GMT+02:00 Alexander Tsirlin <altsir...@gmail.com
<mailto:altsir...@gmail.com>>:
Rather than complaining to the process could you please for
once think that this is your project too and everyone
---
*From:* WikiLovesMonuments
<wikilovesmonuments-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of
Alexander Tsirlin <altsir...@gmail.com>
*Sent:* Saturday, September 17, 2016 11:09 AM
*To:* Wiki Loves Monuments Photograph Competition
*Subject:* Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM photos are delet
Now it is not only about Freedom of Panorama and non-free images.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_VekaSpb
Here, one Commons user nominates a bunch of excellent photos for
deletion after he sees that the user name does not match the name in
EXIF,
r
solutions. Remember that at the end of the day, the Commons community
is also operating based on the same basic principles and motivations
as the rest of the Wikimedia community. We are in this together, and
to move forward efficiently we should work together.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Alexa
Dear Leila,
I can also repeat my point on list. Russian WLM organizers need the time
until October 31 in order to identify and properly transfer no-FOP
files. The Russian organizers really need this time. They are unable and
they will not work in a different time frame. If Commons community
By the way, such images would not qualify for WLM anyway, since they
are copyvios.
Such files are not copyvios. They are distributed under free license,
and the only exception is that they should not be used commercially.
These photos are actively used outside Commons, as you can see from the
:00 Alexander Tsirlin <altsir...@gmail.com
<mailto:altsir...@gmail.com>>:
Dear Nahid,
I'm sure you've put numerous effort and hard works on the WLM but
calling other community members "freaks and assholes" just
because they disagree with you is not a goo
a_Bangladesh>
Twitter: @nahidunlimited <https://twitter.com/nahidunlimited>
http://blog.nahidsultan.xyz/
*From:* WikiLovesMonuments
<wikilovesmonuments-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of
Alexander T
Dear All,
We have a severe problem with some of the photos uploaded during Russian
WLM. As some of you may know, Russia has Freedom of Panorama (FOP) for
architecture, but not for sculptures. Therefore, photos of recent
(post-WWII) sculptures are not eligible for Commons, although they are
fully functional jury tool before WLM kicks off on Sep. 1.
Otherwise, we will have many sleepless nights and create many
more of those for others. It's our high priority to avoid that. :)
Best,
Leila, on behalf of WLM international team
On Sun, Jul 31
We had very bad experience with using the WLX jury tool this year. I
described it at length here:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:WLX_Jury_Tool
Several possible solutions are also mentioned on that page. I would like
to hear your opinion about this situation. Could anyone help
about Russia?
I think a story about Austria might be nice too? Given that it is one
of the most successful countries in terms of coverage?
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Alexander Tsirlin <altsir...@gmail.com
<mailto:altsir...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear Lodewijk,
I can wri
Dear Lodewijk,
I can write something about WLM in Russia, but I have to know the size
limit and the time scale.
Best,
Alexander
On 03.04.2016 13:34, Lodewijk wrote:
Hey folks,
it may be possible to publish a 2 page article in Europa Nostra, but
the deadline would be short. Is there
Thank you. I can say that the Russian part of the the erfgoed database
is not updated at all. We would be grateful for the advice on how to
update it (ideally, how to set up regular updates).
Sincerely,
Alexander
On 26.08.2015 10:21, Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada wrote:
Hello;
The WLM map is
27 matches
Mail list logo
