If the Board is not just a token body, it was in the voting pipeline for a
reason. We really worked hard on trying to make things work -
unfortunately, the visions have dramatically diverted. As I wrote before,
we have been very supportive of the approach that is problem-oriented and
organic (one
Hi,
Dariusz here. As a community-elected trustee with nearly a decade on this
board (and also as one not upcoming for re-election), I want to share my
two cents. Entirely subjective. Very opinionated, too.
I understand Vicky's frustration with the idea of 100+ bureaucrats. Over
and over I tried
will oversee this process with support from Foundation staff [2]. The
Governance Committee created a Board Selection Working Group from trustees who
cannot be candidates in the 2024 community- and affiliate-selected trustee
selection process composed of Dariusz Jemielniak, Nataliia Tymkiv, Esra'a Al
S
/meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> Public archives at
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/JZN3JWUFYTDP5ISVMKRBNIAWZOQUZIIJ/
> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-l
> *Mahuton POSSOUPE (He/Him)*
>
> Movement Strategy & Board Governance facilitator
>
> French-speaking communities
>
> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- w
Hi Andreas,
a quick and short response: we do not provide a response on a thing that
has not been collectively discussed. That's a standard that should be kept,
and the organization of elections is definitely something that needs
discussing every time they happen (the procedure involves several
Hi everyone,
The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees met between March 23-24 for our
first in-person meeting in over two years. It was an opportunity to welcome
our new CEO and several new trustees who have recently joined the Board.
Further updates from the meeting will be shared soon, I am
Hi everyone,
The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees met between March 23-24 for our
first in-person meeting in over two years. It was an opportunity to welcome
our new CEO and several new trustees who have recently joined the Board.
Further updates from the meeting will be shared soon, I am
have you had a chance to check the link I sent?
cheers,
dj
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 4:34 PM David Gerard wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 13:41, Dariusz Jemielniak
> wrote:
>
> > even though I appreciate blockchain as a technology,
>
> This is a common buzzword phrase. Wh
t, as well as his
>> involvement in expanding global recruitment to markets including Ukraine,
>> Poland, Great Britain, the EU and Mexico.
>>
>> Luis was educated in Brazil and the United States, receiving a Bachelor
>> of Science in Computer Engineering with Honors
ps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard/14_September_2021_-_Welcoming_the_new_Wikimedia_Foundation_CEO
>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard/14_September_2021_-_Welcoming_the_new_Wikimedia_Foundation_CEO>*
>> <
Does some basic functionality work? Sure.
Is it as good as Google? Nope.
Is it as good as we can make it? Most likely not.
BTW, we are not doing great in searches irrespective of
multilingualism issues, but we have notably improved over time.
best,
Dariusz Jemielniak, "pundit"
On M
, as Jan
writes.
However, as Tito notes, canvassing votes in return for favors is something
we definitely should reject - as it is pretty much more or less corruption.
best,
dj "pundit"
--
_
<https://nerds.kozminski.edu.pl/>
Dariusz Jemielniak, Ph.D.
Dear Maria,
your insight has been super useful on the board, and I am grateful for all
of your contributions.
This is not a farewell, as I'm confident you will stay in the movement in
different roles, be they formal (like the one you're transitioning to) or
informal, like always.
Can't wait to
Dear Risker,
Many thanks for sharing - I know you're a professional in the field. This
is pretty much what we're doing as the WMF, and the affiliates surely can
follow suit.
All universities I'm currently affiliated with (Harvard, MIT, Kozminski)
cancelled all classes and move to virtual
edia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
> > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > > wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
> > >
> > > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > > wikimedia-l-ow...@lists.wikimedia.o
Hi,
I believe it likely is too early to make a decision. We have a professional
team at the WMF monitoring the situation, but the date is still 5 months in
the future.
It is reasonable to expect that we may need to make adjustments to the
situation as it develops and in 2-3 months it will be
imedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to:
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org<mailto:Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists
g<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org>?subject=unsubscribe>
--
[http://crow.kozminski.edu.pl/minds.jpg]<http://nerds.kozminski.edu.pl/>
prof. dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
kierownik katedry MINDS (Management in Network
s.wikimedia.org<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org>?subject=unsubscribe>
--
[http://crow.kozminski.edu.pl/minds.jpg]<http://nerds.kozminski.edu.pl/>
prof. dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
kierownik katedry MINDS (Manage
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 6:00 PM Todd Allen
mailto:toddmal...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Then, why'd we hear something so dismissive as this?
My intent was not dismissive, but factual (I basically made a point that a
majority of our communities is not interested in administration, organization,
nteer
workforce will not wish to continue to participate in a project that has so
dramatically changed its entire raison d'etre.
Jeff
--
[http://crow.kozminski.edu.pl/minds.jpg]<http://nerds.kozminski.edu.pl/>
prof. dr h
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 4:39 PM Jeff Hawke
mailto:geoffey.ha...@gmail.com>> wrote:
the various projects. I think my question could best have been phrased in
terms of the first meaning -- that is, does the WMF Board expect that after
these recommendations are enacted, and, as we may reasonably
Hi Paulo,
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 4:54 PM Paulo Santos Perneta wrote:
" I'm referring to message from Caroline" - How have you jumped from Caroline
wanting to further clarify something, to the conclusion that the OP was
"pushing people who felt harassed or mistreated to step forward"?
I'm
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 4:26 PM Michel Vuijlsteke
mailto:wikipe...@zog.org>> wrote:
In other words, the best way to ban anyone from any event is to start a
rumour about them?
My understanding is that noone was banned from an event.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 4:28 PM Paulo Santos Perneta
whoa!
pushing people who felt harassed or mistreated to step forward is not ok at
all. I do not honestly understand why the story from nearly a year ago has
emerged, with personal details.
It is not unusual for people who caused distress to not have done it
intentionally, and to genuinely
The thing is, we have a number of tools with a lot of cultural/behavioral
as.well as.technological heritage.
Yes, it would be nice to have a stable one point of entry communication.
Unfortunately, even investing a lot in tech does not warrant a success.
People tend to the most co..on
Likewise. I often refrain from commenting when I think it is more collaborative
and peaceful to do so, though.
dj "pundit"
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 6:00 PM James Heilman
mailto:jmh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
As I trustee, I read and generally find this mailing list useful. Per the
comments around
Dario,
It has been amazing to watch you develop research at the Foundation, and I mean
it both as a researcher myself, and a Wikimedian!
DJ "pundit"
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019, 14:52 Amir Sarabadani
mailto:ladsgr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Dario, I will never forget all of your help when I started
lto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org>?subject=unsubscribe>
--
____
[http://crow.kozminski.edu.pl/minds.jpg]<http://nerds.kozminski.edu.pl/>
prof. dr hab. Dariusz J
Hi Romaine,
What a nice idea! Thanks!
Dj "pundit"
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018, 20:25 Romaine Wiki wrote:
> The official part of Wikimania is over, this does not prevent ourselves
> from celebrating Africa's first Wikimania online, in more particular:
> writing Wikipedia articles.
>
> Africa is
This is deeply saddening. Craig was lively, funny and smart. I will miss
him.
Dj
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018, 19:57 Lodewijk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Through various other channels I learned the unfortunate news that Craig
> Franklin (Lankiveil) has recently passed away. He
dj "pundit"
--
<http://nerds.kozminski.edu.pl/>
Dariusz Jemielniak, Ph.D.
Professor of Management
Chair of MINDS (Management in Networked and Digital Societies) Department
Kozminski University
http://nerds.kozminski.edu.pl <http://nerds.kozminski.edu.pl/>
associate
My personal preference is to NOT link to Facebook. I think they use the
energy of people enough already.
However, I also think it is up to local communities to decide what works
for them best, there is no "one size fits all" here, IMHO
best,
DJ "pundit"
On Feb 28, 2018 20:06, "Jimmy Wales"
That'd be pretty cool.
On Dec 29, 2017 17:44, "James Heilman" wrote:
> Also all the underlying software is also under an open license,
> specifically the MIT license and can be found on Github per
>
> https://ourworldindata.org/about/
>
> James
>
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 9:37
correction of the link:
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Board_approval_of_FDC_recommendation_(2017-18,_Round_1)
(Thanks Frans and Anders for spotting and reaching out!).
dj
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Dariusz Jemielniak <dar...@alk.edu.pl>
wrote:
>
of the participating organizations and
are looking forward to the next round of applications in April 2018.
Sincerely,
Dariusz Jemielniak ("pundit"), on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation Board
of Trustees
[1]
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Board_approval_of_FDC_recommendation_(2016-1
; https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/A_Tor_
>> > Onion_Service_for_Wikipedia
>> > [3]:https://twitter.com/AlecMuffett/status/933739816038076419
>> > [4]: https://github.com/alecmuffett/eotk
>> > [5]:
>> > https://arstechnica.com/information-technol
a
choice). For unlogged Wikipedia reading this solution is practically
transparent for users.
I've recently contacted the WMF with Orbot people and hope that at least we
can evaluate this approach as a possibility.
best,
Dariusz Jemielniak "pundit"
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 2:11 AM, Cristia
hi David,
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 7:52 PM, David Cuenca Tudela
wrote:
> Recently the review for the Wikidata conference grant application has
> started, and I have complained that the funds allocated are insuficient to
> cover the needs of the grants. The requested amount
for being elected. The Board is looking
forward to working with you.
Sincerely,
Dariusz Jemielniak (“pundit”), on behalf of the WMF Board of Trustees
[1]
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Board_approval_of_FDC_recommendation_(2016-17,_Round_2)
[2]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki
e paper you brought to the BGC on
> the 13th April, then? Or are you ready to discuss them now? Or will the
> possibility of establishing them be postponed until some time after the
> Advisory Board is reconstituted?
>
> "Rogol"
>
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Dari
uted Board and the Community at large, nor
> opportunities for the Community at large to be involved in suggesting
> names. I assume then that engagement with the Community is not considered
> important here?
>
> "Rogol"
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Dariusz Jemie
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > ___
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta
Hi,
Somehow the results of the FDC elections have not been yet announced here
on the list. The certified outcome of the elections can be found here:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/2017/Results
Congratulations to:
FDC members
- Michał Buczyński – User:Aegis
hi Faidon,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Faidon Liambotis
wrote:
>
>
> However, it hasn't been a priority for me or my team for these reasons:
> - As long as communities feel so-and-so about Tor overall, and e.g.
> block edits from Tor users, it's hard to justify us
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Yongmin H. wrote:
> FYI: Editing through tor is blocked for logged in users too, unless you
> have `ipblock-exempt`. (It's included in admins and IP Block Exemptions.)
it is NOW, it does not have to be - through an app.
cheers,
dj
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Trillium Corsage
wrote:
> 06.06.2017, 01:11, "Risker" :
> > As far as I can tell (and from comments made in the past by actual Tor
> > users), there is no problem whatsoever for Tor users to read Wikipedia
> > while
w messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines
t; >> >
> >> > On 22 May 2017 at 11:53, Rogol Domedonfors <domedonf...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Indeed. It would be appropriate for members of the Board to state
> now,
> >> > in
> >> > > publ
Congrats! You clearly do something right :)
On May 9, 2017 11:02 AM, "Itzik - Wikimedia Israel"
wrote:
Dear all,
Yesterday (8.5.17) Wikimedia Israel (WMIL) held a general assembly meeting,
during which the members held the elections for members of the Board of
WMIL.
--
> >>> Lane Rasberry
> >>> user:bluerasberry on Wikipedia
> >>> 206.801.0814 <(206)%20801-0814>
> >>> l...@bluerasberry.com
> >>> ___
> >>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines
--
> >>> Lane Rasberry
> >>> user:bluerasberry on Wikipedia
> >>> 206.801.0814 <(206)%20801-0814>
> >>> l...@bluerasberry.com
> >>> ___
> >>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Gnangarra wrote:
>
> I look at the current processes around affiliates thats made it a longer
> journey for any group to become a chapter, but once there it appears rather
> to not take that way in reverse. Maybe the process could be
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 5:23 AM, Gnangarra wrote:
>
> > but they didnt spam, nor did they introduce any false hoods, or remove
> > controversial content, they just put a description of the Whopper for the
> > opening sentence.
I agree with James on this one. They
kimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mail
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Gnangarra wrote:
> Observation: When we place trust within the projects and the community it
> appears that we like to grab the biggest stick possible to whack people
> with it with at the first opportunity.
I am not going to comment on this
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Oloruntoba Oyeyele <
oloruntobaoyey...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for this update. Most especially, it's interesting to know the
> renewed focus on the African community.
It has been overdue and it is great we can work more in this exciting
region! :)
dj
mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
scribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
__
prof. dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
kierownik katedry Zarządzania Międzynarodowego
i grupy badawczej NeRDS
Akademia Leona Koź
hi Craig,
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Craig Franklin
wrote:
> As frustrating as the drama was at the beginning of the year for us, I'd
> prefer to get one well considered story from someone like Dariusz, rather
> than a mishmash of uncoordinated replies that have
Dear members of the Wikimedia community,
On behalf of the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation, I write to
share the news that we have approved [1] the full slate of the FDC’s Round
1 2016-2017 recommendations [2] for the Annual Plan Grants. In this round,
11 organizations will be
hi Rogol,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Rogol Domedonfors
wrote:
> I quite understand that some members of the Board feel that there are more
> important calls on their collective time and resources than engaging
> directly with individual members of the community,
Dear Rogol,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Rogol Domedonfors
wrote:
> Jimmy Wales wrote: "it is possible and welcomed to bring forward issues to
> board members at any time".
>
> It would be most helpful to know where and how the Board in general would
> welcome such
gt; New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
--
__
prof. dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
kierownik katedry
ikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/l
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Rogol Domedonfors
wrote:
> Since however, board and staff members are so concerned about respect and
> good faith, perhaps they would like demonstrate their commitment by being
> more willing to extend those courtesies to members of the
+1 to what Lodewijk, Anders, and James wrote.
I see benefits in onboarding around Wikimania, and having a system in which
each year we add three people (one year from the community, one from
chapters, one from experts).
However, I don't see it as an argument to extend the terms for current
ailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
______
prof. dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
kierownik katedry Zarządzania Międzynarodowego
i grupy badawczej NeRDS
Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego
http://n <http://www.crow.alk.edu.pl/>wrds.kozminski.edu.p
Dear Wikimedians,
We are pleased to inform you that the WMF Board of Trustees has come to a
decision about which four candidates to appoint to the FDC for the next 2
years. It wasn't easy, as the caliber of candidates[*] was extremely high,
and their range of skills and expertise extremely
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Risker wrote:
> I am also curious whether the committee members (and by extension the WMF
> staff and Board liaisons) have undertaken to not run in the next election.
> Given that the Committee is tasked with reviewing and potentially
+1, and also I'm amazed how many outstanding people are willing to help!
17.08.2016 2:34 AM "Christophe Henner" napisał(a):
> I hope nobody will mind, but I'll "Yay" with you too.
>
> Thanks and kuddos to Natalia for bringing the idea up, leading the process,
> and making
Many thanks to all those who nominated themselves for the four vacancies on
the FDC; we have an exceptional slate of candidates this round, of diverse
backgrounds and experiences.
The shortlist of candidates has been posted on meta:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Adrian Raddatz wrote:
> Considering how horrible on-wiki dispute resolution can currently be for
> all involved, I'm OK with keeping this in private here.
>
>
Fair enough. My comment was meant to rather point out that we don't have
rules of
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:22 AM, WereSpielChequers <
werespielchequ...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Pine has a point. We all know that the founder seat will go eventually.
> Whether it goes on the death or incapacity of the founder or earlier is a
> valid question for the board and the community. I'm not
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Florence Devouard
wrote:
>
> We have listened to a lot of community members, both those present at
> Wikimania 2016 and more widely, and decided overall that, given there was
> strong desire for holding Wikimania every year, we should
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Pine W wrote:
>
> I feel that it's important that Board members be able to ask employees at
> any level of the company how things are going. That is different from
> providing direction, which can remain in the management structure
adding
hi Pine,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Pine W wrote:
> It seems to me that it's
> the Board's job to supervise the ED, which hopefully includes supporting
> him/her but also may include providing direction or removing him/her. I
> personally feel that Katherine is doing
> Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/029/42207
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: http
Dear members of the Wikimedia community,
On behalf of the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation, I write to
share the news that we have approved [1] the full slate of the FDC’s Round
2 2015-2016 recommendations [2] for the Annual Plan Grants, as well as
taken good note of the remarks and
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Sydney Poore
wrote:
> With the growth in new methods and processes is the Board planning to have
> a method to monitor/measure the success of these activities?
>
in fact, we have discussed a public "to-do" tracking system, but we are
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Pine W wrote:
> I'll add a question of my own here. I find this statement interesting:
> "Please
> rate these other qualifications: (Please rate 0 to 5 with 0 being 0 not
> important; 5 for extremely important)... Experience of working in an
>
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Nikola Kalchev
wrote:
> Dariusz, thank you for your clarification. I understand that translations
> take time.
>
> Would you please elaborate on the assumption that the most important
> principle of the ED search committee was speed and
t; > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >
> > ___________
&g
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
>
> I would love to see a solid and rigorous hiring process that lends
> credibility to the eventual selection. Has the board done an analysis of
> the previous hiring process to help ensure that the new process will be
> solid and
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
__
prof. dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
kierownik katedry Zarządzania Międzynaro
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:36 PM, James Salsman wrote:
>
> Can we at least get confirmation that her performance working at the
> Foundation will be appropriately weighted in her favor if we do have
> another lengthy, expensive, third-party search?
>
I believe it is always
ia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
>
>
>
> --
> James Heilman
> MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
>
> The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
> www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
&g
hi,
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Ben Creasy wrote:
> Last month, "Geoff and Stephen prepared a draft set of basic best-practice
> recommendations [on governance]". These weren't released publicly as far
> as I
> am aware. "Maria and Dariusz were tasked with preparing a
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Chris Keating
wrote:
> * Does your discussion on Monday include the Code of Conduct and
> Confidentiality Agreement mentioned in the March minutes?
>
Actually, we have discussed and voted on them in April (minutes are in the
process
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> Hoi,
> I wonder what you mean by doing better. Are you doing your best given the
> circumstances? If so you do what can be expected of you. When people think
> that is not enough, it is their problem. They are
ernal governance improvements, communication,
onboarding processes, apart from our usual load. We still can do better,
and I hope we are on a right path.
best,
Dariusz Jemielniak, "pundit"
(a current WMF Trustee)
[1] https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Minutes/2016-03
[2]
https://meta.wik
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Rogol Domedonfors
wrote:
> I can see no reason for this failure. We know that the Board is busy, but
> it is a legal requirement that the minutes be drawn up and discussed, so
> that publication is or should be a matter of very little
As some of you may remember, I was the only trustee who voted against
James' removal except himself.
Nevertheless, I still believe that any functioning body as our Board has to
have the right to expel a person, whom they feel like not being able to
work with.
If a majority of my fellow Board
04.05.2016 22:00 "Katie Horn" napisał(a):
>
> Either way, I would be deeply encouraged to see progress in creating a
more
> robust and predictable connection between the board and WMF staff. Whether
> that connection ends up being a board liaison or something else, I suspect
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Jake Orlowitz wrote:
> 2) The whistleblower policy was indeed insufficient because even very
> serious ethical complaints raised did not rise to the level of strict
> illegality.
>
without referring to issues in the past, I think that a
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Itzik - Wikimedia Israel <
it...@wikimedia.org.il> wrote:
> I'm against publishing the chapters votes before the end of the elections.
> More than that - I even offered before the election started that the
> chapters votes will be confidential between them and be
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Fæ wrote:
> Your email fits perfectly with my description of the WMF board: "have
> not apologized or even changed a single part of their governance
> processes, despite vague unmeasurable offers to look into it."
I'm not sure if it is typical
02.05.2016 5:22 AM "Fæ" napisał(a):
>
> Perhaps we could stick to facts?
>
> In the very recent case of Arnnon Geshuri, the WMF board of trustees
> proved themselves to be completely out of touch with the
> community.[1][2] 314 Wikimedians took part in the vote of no
>
hi,
within the Board Governance Committee, we have discussed several areas for
improvement of the Board members skills. One of the areas we should cover
is deeper enculturation of external Board members.
Both Guy and Kelly are excited to be part of Wikimedia movement, and they
want to learn
1 - 100 of 260 matches
Mail list logo