Certainly, we can wait. But please understand I did not assert WMIN (or
anyone) needs to apologize. Please reread and you'll find I posed it in a
conditional, as *one* possible outcome of resolving Bodhisattwa's concern.
I also described another possible scenario.
A.
On Aug 3, 2018 06:21,
Hello Asaf,
In consent with my last mail on the thread, please be assured, no
discussion whatsoever will take place until WMIN replies to the concerns,
the community takes its time to question, inspect and interrogate the
matter. Yes, all other issues will be raised on a separate thread and in
Folks,
As an outside observer, may I encourage everyone to try to keep this one
thread about its one, original topic? Abhinav, I found your responses
defensive and distracting -- listing other issues and other groups about
which concerns can be raised is a very poor response to *this* concern
Hello Bodhisattwa,
The first line of the mail which at 12:02 by Indian Standard Time, you
stated, "I understand you are felling bad with my toneI am sorry" .
Apologies for getting this statement wrong, If I have.
I would say, let us first address the point 1 which concerns response from
Hi Abhinav,
1. Now that Bodhisattwa has acknowledged on his inappropriate tone
> and it can be believed he would be a caution for future onwards and since
> the issue is in public domain, I would urge Wikimedia India to respond on
> this.
>
Sorry missed this part,
Where have I
Thanks Abhinav for all of this.
About #3: I indeed reached out to A2K staff and asked about the same questions
that you asked me. I cannot day for them and I’d like to assume good faith, but
I myself received the venue details late. I personally wanted everything to be
done publicly, and
sorry again, few corrections from my side about the numbering,
Hi Abhinav,
1) I already said, I am sorry if you find my tone appropriate, but
attacking someone personally was never my intention. I question about the
non-transparent and undocumented process which happened and its a fact. I
still
sorry, few corrections,
Hi Abhinav,
1) I already said, I am sorry if you find my tone appropriate, but
attacking someone personally was never my intention. I question about the
non-transparent and undocumented process which happened and its a fact. I
still find my question extremely relevant and
Hi Abhinav,
1) Got your personal mail and the link. I never knew that and amazed to see
that discussion was going on behind my back in another language Wiki where
i am not even part of. And although I didn't have to justify myself to
anyone, still I opened few glimpse of my personal life to you,
My opinion: The sermonising-in-public-tone is also unfriendly.
Regards.
On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 at 11:13 AM, Abhinav srivastava
wrote:
> Hello Satdeep, Bodhisattwa and All,
>
>
>
> I believe the response to the first statement put by Satdeep, on having
> expected more discussions, stands firm,
Hello Bodhisattwa, Subhashish, Satdeep and All,
Thanks for Writing Back!
To avoid the jumping up of issues, I have listed them point-wise, in case I
have missed any please feel free to add.
1. Now that Bodhisattwa has acknowledged on his inappropriate tone
and it can be believed he would
Hi Abhinav,
Thanks for your mail.
On Thu, 2 Aug 2018, 11:13 Abhinav srivastava, wrote:
> Hello Satdeep, Bodhisattwa and All,
>
>
>
> I believe the response to the first statement put by Satdeep, on having
> expected more discussions, stands firm, Indian community has advanced from
> the
Totally agree, Abhinav. Much appreciate for highlighting the friendly space
aspect as that is very important (and is a very difficult balancing act).
For some context, esp. those who are not in the Wikimania list, sharing
below what I wrote there earlier.
Though I’m not sure if it’d be right to
13 matches
Mail list logo
