[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [pywikipedia r10088]: Revision status changed

"Xqt" changed the status of pywikipedia.r10088 to "ok" URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/10088 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for pywikipedia.r10088: Adding two namespaces to meta_family.py ___ MediaWiki-CodeR

Re: [Wikitech-l] selenium browser testing proposal and prototype

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Ryan Lane wrote: > How many languages can we reasonably support? We're currently using > PHP, Python, Java, OCaml and Javascript (and probably more). Should we > also throw Ruby in here as well? What level of support are the > Selenium tests really going to get if

Re: [Wikitech-l] GSOC 2012 : Lucene Automatic Query Expansion From Wikipedia Text

Also a reminder for folks that this and some other proposals need mentors. Gautham - thank you for the updated proposal page. I would also solicit feedback in our Irc channel if you can and connect with interested mentors: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/GSOC#Mentor_signup https://www.mediawiki.o

Re: [Wikitech-l] selenium browser testing proposal and prototype

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Ryan Lane wrote: > How many languages can we reasonably support? We're currently using > PHP, Python, Java, OCaml and Javascript (and probably more). Should we > also throw Ruby in here as well? What level of support are the > Selenium tests really going to get if t

[Wikitech-l] GSOC 2012 : Lucene Automatic Query Expansion From Wikipedia Text

Hello, Based on the feedback i received i have updated my proposal page. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Gautham_shankar/Gsoc There is about 20 Hrs for the deadline and any final feedback would be useful. I have also submitted the proposal at the GSOC page. Regards, Gautham Shankar

Re: [Wikitech-l] selenium browser testing proposal and prototype

> We really need to start surveying real statistics on what programming > languages community members know. > I've seen this assertion waved around again and again, but don't see where > it originates from, besides the very unreliable fact that we just don't talk > much about ruby around here. > >

Re: [Wikitech-l] selenium browser testing proposal and prototype

On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:53:27 -0700, K. Peachey wrote: On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Chris McMahon wrote: For various reasons, I think the best language for this project is Ruby. I realize that is a controversial choice, and I would like to explain my reasoning. First let me address wha

Re: [Wikitech-l] Proposal to complete manually complete unification of all accounts

Indef user on one project != (always) a project wide issue. Not doing so, would potentially cause issues the same as we already do where the accounts can't unify because they exist elsewhere. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org ht

Re: [Wikitech-l] Proposal to complete manually complete unification of all accounts

K. Peachey wrote: > Why would we not want blocked accounts to be processed? Presumably because an indefinetely blocked name (or worse, oversighted) would then need a global block. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.

Re: [Wikitech-l] Proposal to complete manually complete unification of all accounts

Why would we not want blocked accounts to be processed? ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Proposal to complete manually complete unification of all accounts

On 05/04/12 01:14, Daniel Friesen wrote: > I see no reason for this not do be done as soon as someone with the > capability to do this has time to do it. IMHO at minimum every single > existing username should have been locked out from creation a long time > ago. > It makes complete sense for me

Re: [Wikitech-l] selenium browser testing proposal and prototype

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Chris McMahon wrote: > For various reasons, I think the best language for this project is Ruby.  I > realize that is a controversial choice, and I would like to explain my > reasoning.  First let me address what I think will be the most serious > objections: > > **

[Wikitech-l] selenium browser testing proposal and prototype

As QA Lead for WMF, one of the things I want to do is to create an institutional suite of automated cross-browser regression tests using Selenium. I have two goals for this suite: first, to make it attractive and convenient for the greater software testing community to both use the suite locally

Re: [Wikitech-l] Git/gerrit and RELEASE-NOTES-1.20 merge conflicts

On 05/04/12 10:53, Daniel Friesen wrote: > Firstly: > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=blob;f=lib/git-merge-changelog.c > > A git merge that seams to understand how to intelligently merge some > types of changelog files. > I thought this might be problematic to have everyone inst

[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [Wikimedia r1571]: Revision status changed

"Jpostlethwaite" changed the status of Wikimedia.r1571 to "new" URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/Wikimedia/1571 Old status: fixme New status: new Commit summary for Wikimedia.r1571: Applying civicrm-recurring.patch from CRM-9459. ___ M

[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [Wikimedia r1571]: New comment added

"Jpostlethwaite" posted a comment on Wikimedia.r1571. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/Wikimedia/1571#c32639 Commit summary for Wikimedia.r1571: Applying civicrm-recurring.patch from CRM-9459. Jpostlethwaite's comment: Editing records has been fixed in r1585 and r1586. _

[Wikitech-l] GSoC, conflicts, and competition

On 04/05/2012 02:49 PM, Gregory Varnum wrote: > I was more referencing that like the Flickr applications - we have a case of > multiple students proposing projects around similar topics. I'm not > discouraging that by any means - just being transparent with folks to be > mindful that we have a

Re: [Wikitech-l] You are invited to join the wikiHow source code cleanup project

Jack, I think this is a phenomenal idea and I'm thrilled to have access to some of wikiHow's extension inventions. :) Let me know if I can be of assistance. Let me know if you'd like to house some of this within the Extensions WikiProject on MW.org to document the activity on a WM wiki and al

Re: [Wikitech-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] GSOC proposal: Native application uploader

Thank you for the info - I would suggest including the other info on your wiki page that's outlined here: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Summer_of_Code_2012/Application_template -greg On Apr 5, 2012, at 11:53 AM, Platonides wrote: > Gregory Varnum wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> Thank you for you

Re: [Wikitech-l] GSOC - Green SMW

I was more referencing that like the Flickr applications - we have a case of multiple students proposing projects around similar topics. I'm not discouraging that by any means - just being transparent with folks to be mindful that we have a limited number of spots given to us by Google - so all

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes status in Gerrit

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Platonides wrote: > On 05/04/12 20:23, Roan Kattouw wrote: > > This only happens if you click "Publish and Submit", which means "publish > > my comments and attempt to merge the commit". This fails because there is > > no Verified +1 review, so the commit doesn't

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes status in Gerrit

On 05/04/12 20:23, Roan Kattouw wrote: > This only happens if you click "Publish and Submit", which means "publish > my comments and attempt to merge the commit". This fails because there is > no Verified +1 review, so the commit doesn't satisfy the criteria for > merging. If you click "Publish com

Re: [Wikitech-l] You are invited to join the wikiHow source code cleanup project

I also think it makes more sense to store this in our git. Specailly now that it's a young project. Everything with the same version system makes much more sense. Also, I find the addition of MediaWiki 1.18.1 in r5 quite confusing. That's not what was. I'd make a branch of wikiHow releases, anot

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes status in Gerrit

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Platonides wrote: > If you submit a code review for a changeset and not a verification > status (only if it is not verified?), it throws you an error: > > Application Error > > Server Error > > Requires Verified > > I suspect it's a bug and we should ignore it but

Re: [Wikitech-l] Languages supported by Jenkins (was Changes status in Gerrit)

Hi Chad, On 2012-04-05, at 2:17 PM, Chad wrote: > Once we've got jenkins working reliably, I plan to remove the > verified permission so only the bots can set it. > > -Chad Which languages will Jenkins support? Best, Diederik ___ Wikitech-l mailing l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes status in Gerrit

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Platonides wrote: > If you submit a code review for a changeset and not a verification > status (only if it is not verified?), it throws you an error: >> Application Error >> Server Error >> Requires Verified > > I suspect it's a bug and we should ignore it but, can

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes status in Gerrit

If you submit a code review for a changeset and not a verification status (only if it is not verified?), it throws you an error: > Application Error > Server Error > Requires Verified I suspect it's a bug and we should ignore it but, can we get rid of it? We don't want changesets dummily marked as

[Wikitech-l] One day left to help criticize newbies :-)

If you want to help us grow the MediaWiki developer community, there's a quick thing you can do today. You can give feedback to one of these three proposals: * Automatic Taxobox Usability and Feature Enhancements - Have the automatic taxobox's main and most used features exposed as a GUI https://

Re: [Wikitech-l] [WikimediaMobile] HTML history interface / api use for MobileFrontend

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Jon Robson wrote: > > The best way to balance all the pros/cons is to load the chrome+first > > paragraph as fast as possible. *Then* load all subsequent sections > > asynchronously *while* the user is reading the first section. That way we > > have all the conten

Re: [Wikitech-l] [WikimediaMobile] HTML history interface / api use for MobileFrontend

> The best way to balance all the pros/cons is to load the chrome+first > paragraph as fast as possible. *Then* load all subsequent sections > asynchronously *while* the user is reading the first section. That way we > have all the content by the time the user gets to each sub section. This > resol

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes status in Gerrit

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Happy Melon wrote: > So basically, in Gerrit, (1 + 1 != 2)...?? :-) > > ...and that's exactly why I said that "+2" is a confusingly named concept in my previous message. Roan ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.

Re: [Wikitech-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] GSOC proposal: Native application uploader

Gregory Varnum wrote: > Greetings, > > Thank you for your work on this and interest in this year's GSOC. > > Have you had a chance to write up a proposal on the MW.org wiki? > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/GSOC#Student_applications Hello Greg, I've copied it now at https://www.mediawiki.org/wi

[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [pywikipedia r10081]: New comment added

"Xqt" posted a comment on pywikipedia.r10081. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/10081#c32638 Commit summary for pywikipedia.r10081: ndashredir.py saves the titles that may need manual treatment + adding ndashredir.py to CONTENTS. Xqt's comment: You're right, was non-e

[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [pywikipedia r10081]: New comment added

"Xqt" posted a comment on pywikipedia.r10081. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/10081#c32637 Commit summary for pywikipedia.r10081: ndashredir.py saves the titles that may need manual treatment + adding ndashredir.py to CONTENTS. Xqt's comment: You're right, was non-e

Re: [Wikitech-l] Git review issue

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Jeroen De Dauw wrote: > Hey, > >> On 5 April 2012 16:31, Chad wrote: >> Like I said on IRC, you can skip the rebase with `git review-R` > > git review -R > remote: Resolving deltas:   0% (0/3) > remote: ERROR: missing Change-Id in commit message > remote: Suggesti

[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [pywikipedia r10079]: New comment added

"Bináris" posted a comment on pywikipedia.r10079. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/10079#c32636 Commit summary for pywikipedia.r10079: Handling global arguments, introducing parameters for namespace and start title. Bináris's comment: Should I? This seemed to be a goo

Re: [Wikitech-l] Git review issue

Hey, > On 5 April 2012 16:31, Chad wrote: > Like I said on IRC, you can skip the rebase with `git review-R` git review -R remote: Resolving deltas: 0% (0/3) remote: ERROR: missing Change-Id in commit message remote: Suggestion for commit message: remote: style tweaks remote: remote: Change-Id:

[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [pywikipedia r10081]: New comment added

"Bináris" posted a comment on pywikipedia.r10081. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/10081#c32635 Commit summary for pywikipedia.r10081: ndashredir.py saves the titles that may need manual treatment + adding ndashredir.py to CONTENTS. Bináris's comment: Oh, thanks. I w

Re: [Wikitech-l] Git review issue

Like I said on IRC, you can skip the rebase with `git review-R` On Apr 5, 2012 10:30 AM, "Jeroen De Dauw" wrote: > Hey, > > I ran into a git review issue after doing a fresh Ubuntu install with the > packages from the regular sources, asked for help at several places and > googled for 2 hours, al

[Wikitech-l] Git review issue

Hey, I ran into a git review issue after doing a fresh Ubuntu install with the packages from the regular sources, asked for help at several places and googled for 2 hours, all to no avail. git review Errors running git rebase -i remotes/gerrit/master /usr/lib/git-core/git-rebase--interactive: 1:

[Wikitech-l] Today: Sprint to fix up the 1.19 features page

For MediaWiki 1.18, we had a really beautiful page that had a good, easy to read, easy to scan, summary of the things in 1.18. I'm not sure we can make the 1.19 page (http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki_1.19) as nice as that, but I would like something a little better than what we have right n

Re: [Wikitech-l] GSOC proposal: Native application uploader

I have years of experiences with c++ and gui and I will be happy to help you in any way On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Platonides wrote: > On 05/04/12 02:19, Max Semenik wrote: >> When I hear "C++" and "UI", I reach for my minigun. And you want to >> make it tiny and portable, too;) Though if yo

[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r113405]: New comment added

"Platonides" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r113405. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/113405#c32634 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r113405: I'm fed up of new labs users having problems on initial login because their key was in the wrong format. When the key doesn't look to

Re: [Wikitech-l] GSOC proposal: Native application uploader

On 05/04/12 02:19, Max Semenik wrote: > When I hear "C++" and "UI", I reach for my minigun. And you want to > make it tiny and portable, too;) Though if you consider QT or > wxWidgets to be tinier than JRE/Mono/.NET... Let's make a straw weight competition: du -hc /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/ 119

[Wikitech-l] Fwd: [Puppet Users] openstack-puppet mailing list

FYI -- Forwarded message -- From: "Dan Bode" Date: Apr 5, 2012 12:24 AM Subject: [Puppet Users] openstack-puppet mailing list To: "public puppet users" Hi all, I have been working to create a community around a set of modules for configuring and deploying OpenStack. For folks

[Wikitech-l] Wikimedia engineering 20% policy status

Context: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_engineering_20%25_policy > Tim Starling wrote: >> "20% time" is an attempt to correct broader related trends, but >> perhaps we need a more project-oriented approach within our 20% time >> policy in order to encourage mentoring and start the pipeli

[Wikitech-l] Wikimedia engineering report for March 2012

Hi, The report covering Wikimedia engineering activities in March 2012 is now available. Wiki version: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_engineering_report/2012/March Blog version: https://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/04/05/engineering-march-2012-report/ -- Guillaume Paumier Technical Commu

Re: [Wikitech-l] Live testing of Ashburn search infrastructure

Documentation is here: http://wikitech.wikimedia.org/view/Search I have yet to really thoroughly update it, but better documentation and monitoring is what I'll be focusing for the next bit, so watch that page fro changes! Additionally, I will probably write a blog post! Let me know if you have

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes status in Gerrit

On 5 April 2012 11:43, Antoine Musso wrote: > Le 04/04/12 22:56, Roan Kattouw a écrit : > > >> What that means, is that a change could look fine (Verified + CR) and > >> thus be merged by accident if someone with the correct right click the > >> 'Submit Patch Set 1' button :-D > >> > >> No, that

Re: [Wikitech-l] Time to redirect to https by default?

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Petr Bena wrote: > Actually bits is a great target for the country which wants to prevent > people from having access, it makes it look as the problem is on side > of "capitalist wikipedia, which is broken most of time" and thus > people should use the proper encycl

Re: [Wikitech-l] Changes status in Gerrit

Le 04/04/12 22:56, Roan Kattouw a écrit : >> What that means, is that a change could look fine (Verified + CR) and >> thus be merged by accident if someone with the correct right click the >> 'Submit Patch Set 1' button :-D >> >> No, that's not true. A change requires Code Review +2 before it can

Re: [Wikitech-l] GSOC 2012

Dear Sudeep, note that the proposal for "Semantic form rules" is proposed and mentored by Stephan Gambke, who is a contributor to MW/SMW. I am not sure if he is reading this list. I have contacted him now, but if you do not hear from him very soon, I suggest to focus on one of the other proje

Re: [Wikitech-l] Development process doesn't work (yes this is another complaint from another community member)

Le 05/04/12 00:27, MZMcBride a écrit : > I asked about this "policy" a few months ago: > . > > Rob never replied and the thread died. There's a difference between having a > page on MediaWiki.org and having a policy. From what

Re: [Wikitech-l] You are invited to join the wikiHow source code cleanup project

On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 14:33:25 -0700, Jack Phoenix wrote: To those who don't know me yet, hi! I'm Jack Phoenix, and I've been a MediaWiki developer since May 2008. One of the major third-party users of the MediaWiki software is wikiHow ( http://www.wikihow.com/), a free how-to manual. In my op

Re: [Wikitech-l] GSOC 2012

Hi we are running out of time Thanks for your interest in out project at Wikimedia The GSOC proposals should be mostly specified by the student – Those of you who have not done so should draft proposals and place them in at www.mediawiki.org in your user space, then post a link here, or email me

Re: [Wikitech-l] Git/gerrit and RELEASE-NOTES-1.20 merge conflicts

On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 18:24:03 -0700, Tim Starling wrote: On 04/04/12 10:31, Daniel Friesen wrote: We have a policy of restricting the length of the first line. Since it's used by gerrit as email subjects. So as a result when I write the first line of a git commit I inevitably leave out critic

Re: [Wikitech-l] GSOC - Green SMW

On 04/04/12 06:01, Gregory Varnum wrote: I'll admit - I'm intrigued by the notion of carbon footprint reduction via software enhancements.. :) I appreciate that you've concisely provided background on the what and how. I'm curious if you can expand a tad more on the why. To many the notion

Re: [Wikitech-l] Development process doesn't work (yes this is another complaint from another community member)

2012/4/5 Petr Bena : > I don't know if this is a part of some joke > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/LiquidThreads_3.0/status > > but it seems that someone wrote some code Yes, Werdna was working on it for a bit (hes currently attached to other WMF projects currently as to my understanding) iirc t

Re: [Wikitech-l] Development process doesn't work (yes this is another complaint from another community member)

The mediawiki page is legit, although you'll notice that it's not been updated since last October; this reflects the fact that there's not current work going on. The email announcement to this list was not. Ariel Στις 05-04-2012, ημέρα Πεμ, και ώρα 09:47 +0200, ο/η Petr Bena έγραψε: > I don't k

Re: [Wikitech-l] Development process doesn't work (yes this is another complaint from another community member)

I don't know if this is a part of some joke https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/LiquidThreads_3.0/status but it seems that someone wrote some code 2012/4/5 Petr Bena : > This isn't true? > > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/LiquidThreads_3.0 > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Ariel T. Glenn wrote: >>

Re: [Wikitech-l] Development process doesn't work (yes this is another complaint from another community member)

This isn't true? https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/LiquidThreads_3.0 On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Ariel T. Glenn wrote: > *cough* LQT 3 is private because it doesn't exist... see the date of > that email (hint, 1st day of April). > > If there were to be a project like that I expect it would be v

Re: [Wikitech-l] Development process doesn't work (yes this is another complaint from another community member)

*cough* LQT 3 is private because it doesn't exist... see the date of that email (hint, 1st day of April). If there were to be a project like that I expect it would be very very public indeed. ;-) Ariel Στις 05-04-2012, ημέρα Πεμ, και ώρα 09:10 +0200, ο/η Petr Bena έγραψε: > When we talk about

[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r114714]: Revision status changed

"Nikerabbit" changed the status of MediaWiki.r114714 to "ok" URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/114714 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r114714: Fix another i18n key typo ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mail

[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r114712]: Revision status changed

"Nikerabbit" changed the status of MediaWiki.r114712 to "ok" URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/114712 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r114712: Fix typo in i18n message key ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview m

[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [pywikipedia r10076]: New comment added, and revision status changed

"Xqt" changed the status of pywikipedia.r10076 to "ok" and commented it. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/10076#c32633 Old Status: new New Status: ok Commit summary for pywikipedia.r10076: A new script to create redirects to articles with n dash/m dash in their title.

Re: [Wikitech-l] Time to redirect to https by default?

Actually bits is a great target for the country which wants to prevent people from having access, it makes it look as the problem is on side of "capitalist wikipedia, which is broken most of time" and thus people should use the proper encyclopedias of China which are correct and looking better than

[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [pywikipedia r10082]: Revision status changed

"Xqt" changed the status of pywikipedia.r10082 to "ok" URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/10082 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for pywikipedia.r10082: With -nosub will not process subpages. Useful in template or portal namespace.

[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [pywikipedia r10077]: Revision status changed

"Xqt" changed the status of pywikipedia.r10077 to "ok" URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/10077 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for pywikipedia.r10077: Added SVN properties (I forgot that a new script needs it manually) ___

Re: [Wikitech-l] Time to redirect to https by default?

Indeed, I live in europe and bits seems to be very blocked to me :) there is a problem with connectivity I guess, because I am having this problem as well most of time, the service is up, but slow, which makes the load of one page to take minutes On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Ryan Lane wrote: >

[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [pywikipedia r10079]: Revision status changed

"Xqt" changed the status of pywikipedia.r10079 to "ok" URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/10079 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for pywikipedia.r10079: Handling global arguments, introducing parameters for namespace and start title. __

[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [pywikipedia r10079]: New comment added

"Xqt" posted a comment on pywikipedia.r10079. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/10079#c32632 Commit summary for pywikipedia.r10079: Handling global arguments, introducing parameters for namespace and start title. Xqt's comment: why do you not use pagegenerators for -st

[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [pywikipedia r10081]: Revision status changed

"Xqt" changed the status of pywikipedia.r10081 to "resolved" URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/10081 Old status: fixme New status: resolved Commit summary for pywikipedia.r10081: ndashredir.py saves the titles that may need manual treatment + adding ndashredir.py to C

[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [pywikipedia r10081]: New comment added

"Bináris" posted a comment on pywikipedia.r10081. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/10081#c32631 Commit summary for pywikipedia.r10081: ndashredir.py saves the titles that may need manual treatment + adding ndashredir.py to CONTENTS. Bináris's comment: Where is the er

Re: [Wikitech-l] Development process doesn't work (yes this is another complaint from another community member)

When we talk about the public code, why the development of new software like LQT 3 is private? Why community devs can't participate on that? When is it going to be pushed to readeable repository? I also heard from B Harris that there is a work on new interface design, which some code name, there is

[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [pywikipedia r10081]: New comment added, and revision status changed

"Xqt" changed the status of pywikipedia.r10081 to "fixme" and commented it. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/10081#c32630 Old Status: new New Status: fixme Commit summary for pywikipedia.r10081: ndashredir.py saves the titles that may need manual treatment + adding nd

[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [pywikipedia r10080]: Revision status changed

"Xqt" changed the status of pywikipedia.r10080 to "deferred" URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/10080 Old status: new New status: deferred Commit summary for pywikipedia.r10080: update namespace alias (bug #3514695) ___ Media

[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [pywikipedia r10078]: Revision status changed

"Xqt" changed the status of pywikipedia.r10078 to "ok" URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/10078 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for pywikipedia.r10078: i18n for ndashredir.py ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing lis