9 Ноябрь 2012 г. 2:52:54 пользователь Daniel Friesen
(dan...@nadir-seen-fire.com) написал:
On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:08:53 -0800, Tim Starling
wrote:
> All extension branches were removed during the migration to Git. Very
> few extensions have branches for MW core major version support.
> T
On 07/11/12 13:09, Krinkle wrote:
> In most (if not all) cases of people using $.browser it is because they want
> different behaviour for browsers that don't support a certain something.
> Please
> take a minute to look at the code and find out what it is you are
> special-casing
> for that appa
>
> Maybe we need a Waiting_merge status in bugzilla.
>
I would like that. I find the "patch-in-gerrit" keyword very easy to
miss, and really "patch in gerrit" and "open" are two very different
stages of a bugs lifestyle.
-bawolff
___
Wikitech-l mailin
On 08/11/12 20:00, Chad wrote:
> I don't really like that idea either. How about instead of auto-closing, we
> at least have Gerrit tell BZ a patch was committed/submitted? That would
> save the "I've put a patch in " step, and would prompt people on the
> CC list to possibly close when Gerrit says
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Tim Starling wrote:
> All extension branches were removed during the migration to Git. Very
> few extensions have branches for MW core major version support.
> There's no longer a simple way to branch all extensions when a core
> release is updated, and nobody has v
On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:08:53 -0800, Tim Starling
wrote:
All extension branches were removed during the migration to Git. Very
few extensions have branches for MW core major version support.
There's no longer a simple way to branch all extensions when a core
release is updated, and nobody has
On 09/11/12 09:43, Platonides wrote:
> It's easy to make a script which creates such branch for each extension,
> but I'm not convinced that's the right thing to do.
>
> Also, did we make Extension:Distributor properly support branches on git
> extensions?
No.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show
OpenITP and the Information Security Coalition (ISC)] will be hosting
the second annual Circumvention Tech Summit from November 26-28 in
Tunis, Tunisia. http://openitp.org/?q=cts_tunis_nov_2012
If you want to attend to help people get around internet censorship &
surveillance in reading and editi
It's easy to make a script which creates such branch for each extension,
but I'm not convinced that's the right thing to do.
Also, did we make Extension:Distributor properly support branches on git
extensions?
In an ideal world we would have perfect tests for all extensions, and
jenkins could aut
Hi Timo,
2012/11/7 Krinkle :
> Just a reminder that jQuery will (after almost 4 years of deprecation!) drop
> $.browser [1] in jQuery 1.9.
Thanks for the reminder: it was still used in the MediaWiki:Commons.js
of the French Wikipedia.
What frightens me a bit is that I've been unable to find it us
All extension branches were removed during the migration to Git. Very
few extensions have branches for MW core major version support.
There's no longer a simple way to branch all extensions when a core
release is updated, and nobody has volunteered to write a script.
So we're back to the situation
>> And I really don't like the idea of B. I can easily see
>> people mentioning bugs that are related to a commit in the
>> commit message but not directly fixed by it.
>
> Then why did you invent B only to rail against it? Just use
> a reasonable pattern, e. g. "This fixes bug #(\d+)\."
>
At my
Stephan Gambke wrote:
> is there a recommended work flow for bugfixing?
> Right now what I do is submit a patch to gerrit and, if I remember, set
> some tag in bugzilla. At some point somebody approves and merges the
> patch. Then, if I remember, I set the bug to resolved/fixed in bugzilla.
> T
"Daniel Friesen" wrote:
>> is there a recommended work flow for bugfixing?
>> Right now what I do is submit a patch to gerrit and, if I remember, set
>> some tag in bugzilla. At some point somebody approves and merges the
>> patch. Then, if I remember, I set the bug to resolved/fixed in bugzilla
On 11/08/2012 07:43 PM, Daniel Friesen wrote:
>> Would it be possible/sensible to automatically close a bug when the
>> patch is merged? Or did I miss something?
>
> That would require two things:
> A) Far more integration between Gerrit and Bugzilla than we currently have.
> B) An assumption that
Hi everyone!
I'm really sorry for the late notice on this. I could have sworn I
sent this on Thursday.
We would like to once again have our Open Tech Chat this Thursday,
November 8 at 12:30pm PST (20:30 UTC). This week, we have a guest:
Nils Adermann, development lead for phpBB and a primary co
Then again, it does seem like a lot less work to run Collide, if we can
do it with Chromium and OpenJDK.
Update: I tried running Collide on my machine. It took some hacking to
get through the Ant build process, and finally I came to a point where
the README said "run ./bin/deploy/collide" and
What about changes like https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/29422/,
which mentions bug 1, but obviously doesn't entirely fix it?
It wouldn't be put into the branch, or maybe it would be put into the
branch but the branch would never get closed. But I like Chad's idea
better, currently.
--
Mar
2012/11/8 Mark Holmquist :
>> And I really don't like the idea of B. I can easily see people
>> mentioning bugs that are related to a commit in the commit message but
>> not directly fixed by it.
>
>
> Maybe we should start a new branch per-bug instead, and merge the branch
> when the bug is fixed?
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Mark Holmquist wrote:
>> And I really don't like the idea of B. I can easily see people
>> mentioning bugs that are related to a commit in the commit message but
>> not directly fixed by it.
>
>
> Maybe we should start a new branch per-bug instead, and merge the bra
And I really don't like the idea of B. I can easily see people
mentioning bugs that are related to a commit in the commit message but
not directly fixed by it.
Maybe we should start a new branch per-bug instead, and merge the branch
when the bug is fixed? That might help with this issue.
--
M
2012/11/8 Stephan Gambke :
> Hi,
>
> is there a recommended work flow for bugfixing?
>
> Right now what I do is submit a patch to gerrit and, if I remember, set
> some tag in bugzilla. At some point somebody approves and merges the
> patch. Then, if I remember, I set the bug to resolved/fixed in bu
On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 13:00 -0500, Chad wrote:
> > Would it be possible/sensible to automatically close a bug when the
> > patch is merged? Or did I miss something?
> >
>
> In theory, yes. Someone already started writing a plugin to do the same thing
> for Jira[0]. Might be a good starting place f
On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:54:43 -0800, Stephan Gambke
wrote:
Hi,
is there a recommended work flow for bugfixing?
Right now what I do is submit a patch to gerrit and, if I remember, set
some tag in bugzilla. At some point somebody approves and merges the
patch. Then, if I remember, I set the bu
Hi,
I've implemented AJAX patrolling for the MediaWiki core
( https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/26440 ) and I would like to gather some
feedback and hopefully get someone to take a look at the code in the
hope to get it merged soon (as the change is in gerrit for more than a
month now).
It acts like
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Stephan Gambke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a recommended work flow for bugfixing?
>
> Right now what I do is submit a patch to gerrit and, if I remember, set
> some tag in bugzilla. At some point somebody approves and merges the
> patch. Then, if I remember, I set th
Hi,
is there a recommended work flow for bugfixing?
Right now what I do is submit a patch to gerrit and, if I remember, set
some tag in bugzilla. At some point somebody approves and merges the
patch. Then, if I remember, I set the bug to resolved/fixed in bugzilla.
There is a bit too much rememb
Hi folks,
I know some of you are tired of these wm-bot messages :) but I didn't send
one regarding today's maintenance and now I feel sorry for that.
I did a huge maintenance today replacing the old monolithic core with new
lightweight core with features bundled as dynamic modules (which makes it
On 11/08/2012 09:43 AM, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
> When you want to pair program with someone far away, what do you use? I
> just read about Collide:
>
> https://lwn.net/Articles/521647/
>
> https://code.google.com/p/collide/
>
> Collide has "line numbering, syntax highlighting, auto-complet
On 12-11-08 08:32 AM, Dan Andreescu wrote:
+1 on getting collide up and running. It's open source and looks like it
already does project management and syntax highlighting
From https://code.google.com/p/collide/:
Requires
Client: recent Chrome or Safari
Server: Java 7 JRE
Build:
+1 on getting collide up and running. It's open source and looks like it
already does project management and syntax highlighting
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Mark Holmquist wrote:
> FWIW there is a way to add in syntax highlighting, and I could probably
>> create a new instance for that. Th
Le 07/11/12 13:07, Dmitriy Sintsov a écrit :
>
> At one wiki host there is 5.3.3-7+squeeze14 with apc 3.1.3p1 (both are
> quite old however these are provided by Debian and I am not a regular
> admin of the server).
> The wiki host has about 10-20k visits per day and about 3500 of pages.
> It's no
FWIW there is a way to add in syntax highlighting, and I could probably
create a new instance for that. There was also chatter on the Etherpad
channel yesterday about writing plugins for compiling and running
programs on the backend of the server.
Additionally, I suppose, we could write a plugin
Do any of you use Cloud9, Brackets, emacs + xhost, or some other
tool/service? Do you recommend them? http://etherpad.wmflabs.org/pad/
is all very well and good but it doesn't support syntax highlighting.
FWIW there is a way to add in syntax highlighting, and I could probably
create a new ins
Platonides gmail.com> writes:
> On 06/11/12 23:35, Amelia Ireland wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Is it possible to pause and resume a Mediawiki edit?
> >
> > To explain, I've written a MW extension that accesses an external
> > database; this database requires OAuth authentication [1.0, pre-OAut
When you want to pair program with someone far away, what do you use? I
just read about Collide:
https://lwn.net/Articles/521647/
https://code.google.com/p/collide/
Collide has "line numbering, syntax highlighting, auto-completion, and
real-time file tree manipulation" but the syntax highlighte
First off, TL;DR:
(@Tim: did my best to summarize, please correct any misrepresentation.)
* Tim: don't re-parse when sitelinks change.
* Daniel: can be done, but do we really need to optimize for this case? Denny,
can we get better figures on this?
* Daniel: how far do we want to limit the thing
Sue Gardner, 08/11/2012 07:03:
> I kind of have the sense that people are considering this a done
deal. [...]
>
> So to be super-clear: None of this is a done deal at this moment. Lots
> of conversations are happening in various places, and it's all good.
> That's why Erik made the pre-announcem
38 matches
Mail list logo
