We are about to enter the final sprint to migrate Bugzilla and RT to
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org. The move from Trello and Mingle is about
to start as well. And well, it is time to plan the migration from Gerrit.
The first goal is to build a proof of concept based on a sample of
repositories
Quim Gil wrote:
>We are about to enter the final sprint to migrate Bugzilla and RT to
>https://phabricator.wikimedia.org. The move from Trello and Mingle is
>about to start as well. And well, it is time to plan the migration from
>Gerrit.
I'm confused by this e-mail. I don't understand why you're
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:44 AM, MZMcBride wrote:
> And, even though it should go without saying, Bugzilla will need to remain
> online in a read-only format indefinitely post-migration.
>
Why would this be necessary, assming everything is properly imported to
Phab?
Will *every* detail of a BZ
On Oct 19, 2014 11:52 AM, "Rjd0060" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:44 AM, MZMcBride wrote:
>
> > And, even though it should go without saying, Bugzilla will need to
remain
> > online in a read-only format indefinitely post-migration.
> >
>
> Why would this be necessary, assming everything
Hi,
On Sun, 2014-10-19 at 10:44 -0400, MZMcBride wrote:
> Quim Gil wrote:
> >We are about to enter the final sprint to migrate Bugzilla and RT to
> >https://phabricator.wikimedia.org. The move from Trello and Mingle is
> >about to start as well. And well, it is time to plan the migration from
> >G
On Sun, 2014-10-19 at 10:52 -0400, Rjd0060 wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:44 AM, MZMcBride wrote:
>
> > And, even though it should go without saying, Bugzilla will need to remain
> > online in a read-only format indefinitely post-migration.
> >
>
> Why would this be necessary, assming every
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 4:44 PM, MZMcBride wrote:
>
> I'm confused by this e-mail. I don't understand why you're seemingly
> switching to a focus on code review
Sorry for the confusion, sometimes it is tricky to find the balance between
brevity and clarity.
As the description of https://phabri
Rjd0060 wrote:
>On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:44 AM, MZMcBride wrote:
>> And, even though it should go without saying, Bugzilla will need to
>>remain
>> online in a read-only format indefinitely post-migration.
>
>Why would this be necessary, assming everything is properly imported to
>Phab?
>
>Will
In fact...
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Quim Gil wrote:
>
> As the description of https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T18 says, The
> Code Review migration to Phabricator is quite orthogonal to the RT and
> Bugzilla migrations, and we should start planning for it now. We need to
> request reso
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Brian Wolff wrote:
> Well there are a lot of links to it first of all.
>
For which a redirect is a much better solution than sending the reader to a
dead site and leaving them to figure out it's dead. At least for direct bug
references it should be easy to set up
10 matches
Mail list logo