On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:27 AM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.comwrote:
When Commons gets the Wikidata treatment, almost everything that has to do
with meta data will gain wikidata statements on the Wikidata item that
reflects a media file (sound photo movie no matter). When items
Hoi,
Your assumption is that the metadata from Wikidata will be essentially the
same. It is not.
Because the metadata will be essentially different, I ask for attention. At
this moment in time all the metadata is essentially English. This will be
no longer the case with Wikidata. The data that is
On Mar 9, 2014 1:35 AM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
Your assumption is that the metadata from Wikidata will be essentially the
same. It is not.
Because the metadata will be essentially different, I ask for attention.
At
this moment in time all the metadata is
Hoi,
On the Wikidata roadmap it says that Commons will be targeted for inclusion
in the second half of 2014. This will have a big impact on Commons.
Consequently it will have a big impact on the things that you are
discussing. Chances are that much of what you come up with now will be
obsolete in
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 11:50 +0100, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
On the Wikidata roadmap it says that Commons will be targeted for inclusion
in the second half of 2014. This will have a big impact on Commons.
Consequently it will have a big impact on the things that you are
discussing. Chances are
Hoi,
When Commons gets the Wikidata treatment, almost everything that has to do
with meta data will gain wikidata statements on the Wikidata item that
reflects a media file (sound photo movie no matter). When items refer to
Creators or Institutions they will refer to Wikidata proper.
This will
Hey,
This overview seems quite reasonable to me until this point:
on the other hand it [using ie dependency injection] would mean a lot of
gadgets break every
time we change things, and some possibly do even if we don't.
I am unsure how you are reaching that conclusion.
Dependency
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Gergo Tisza gti...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi all,
== The state of unit tests ==
We discussed these issues, and decided that writing the tests was still a
good decision at the time, but once we are done with the major code
refactorings, we should take some time
On 7 March 2014 15:13, Chris McMahon cmcma...@wikimedia.org wrote:
This process is something that I think would be of great interest to a
variety of teams:
* When to throw away old tests
* When to create new tests (TDD style, before writing the code that
satisfies the test?)
* When to
Also see Michael Feathers' response to Coplien via Twitter:
http://michaelfeathers.typepad.com/michael_feathers_blog/2008/06/the-flawed-theo.html
/ https://twitter.com/mfeathers/statuses/441598005515669504
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:53 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 March 2014
+1
If this helps to get it on the list
Am 07.03.2014 12:28 schrieb Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com:
Hoi,
When Commons gets the Wikidata treatment, almost everything that has to do
with meta data will gain wikidata statements on the Wikidata item that
reflects a media file (sound
On 7 March 2014 17:15, Chris McMahon cmcma...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Also see Michael Feathers' response to Coplien via Twitter:
http://michaelfeathers.typepad.com/michael_feathers_blog/2008/06/the-flawed-theo.html
/ https://twitter.com/mfeathers/statuses/441598005515669504
With which I and
On 7 mrt. 2014, at 12:27, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
When Commons gets the Wikidata treatment, almost everything that has to do
with meta data will gain wikidata statements on the Wikidata item that
reflects a media file (sound photo movie no matter). When items
13 matches
Mail list logo