On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 02:40:07 -0600 (CST), Butch Evans wrote
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, wispa wrote:
Uhmm, Butch... No, they're not asking for a means. They're
insisting that we build the tap into our network, at our expense,
prior to a request ( whether we got any requests or not ), to
Actually we have recently added an LNA to this product that boosts the
receive sensitivity to -91 @ 11Mbps (same as the DLB25xx). We haven't
had time to update all the product docs yet but will hopefully get to it
today or tomorrow.
-Hal
Harold Bledsoe
Deliberant LLC
800.742.9865 x205 (office)
I misunderstood this initially also, but the Feds do NOT have access to your
network. They have to provide you with a subpoena and then you have
(generally) 48 hours to provide them with the traffic stream. I do agree
that it is an unfunded mandate, but I don't see any way around it.
You do get
We are just deploying a new IOS image that includes Cisco's SII
architecture. Our only cost is time.
-Matt
Rick Smith wrote:
OK, Don't point me to some confusing URL I don't have time
(or patience) to read about how to comply with CALEA.
What are YOU as a WISP doing to comply ?
How much
My understanding is that only broadband providers are responsible to
be compliant. In order to be a broadband provider you have to offer
symmetrical 200kb+ service.
Anthony
Broadband Corp.
Jason wrote:
1. Here's a question: for those who don't have symmetric rates
to/from the internet (I
Marlon-
We have three of them in testing. So far, I'm pretty impressed.
They have a newer iteration that had a preamp built in, so the sensitivity
is very good.
Stay away from the Amp and try the Deliberant. That FCC sticker on the side
is your friend if/when you get a visit from Uncle Charlie.
HEAD ON - Apply directly to your forehead!
On 2/13/07, Mac Dearman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patients who experience an acute psychotic episode lasting longer than one
day but less than one month and that may or may not immediately follow an
important life stress or a pregnancy (with postpartum
OK folks - Most of you are in rural areas where you are the only
choice for broadband. You need to advise your subscribers and your
congressional representatives of the hardship this will cause. Perhaps
if they lose votes, they will help.
-RickG
On 2/13/07, Dave Brenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt -
Do you have a link to this, or an IOS train number? I couldn't find it on
CCO.
I know Cisco has a solution, just haven't been able to find much about it.
Thanks,
Russ Kreigh
Network Engineer
OnlyInternet.Net Broadband Wireless
Supernova Technologies
Office: (800) 363-0989
Direct:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps352/prod_bulletin0900aecd802d2ed0.html
-Matt
Russ Kreigh wrote:
Matt -
Do you have a link to this, or an IOS train number? I couldn't find it on
CCO.
I know Cisco has a solution, just haven't been able to find much about it.
Thanks,
Russ
So what are people who are filing doing to become compliant by May? Are
there specific products being used?
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Mark,
You keep saying that the government is killing you, and yet we keep getting
posts from you...indicating to me that you're still in business. What's up
with that?
Mark Nash
Network Engineer
UnwiredOnline.Net
350 Holly Street
Junction City, OR 97448
http://www.uwol.net
541-998-
Looks like these platforms are supported:
1-pre2
1-pre3
7200
7301
as5350
as5350xm
as5400
as5400hpx
as5400xm
as5850-ersc
as5850-rsc
--
Dylan Oliver
Primaverity, LLC
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Mark,
With CFR Part-15 rules we did ask for and received relaxing of the
qualifications for certification of systems to allow for lower cost
certification of legal systems using multiple combinations of antennas
with radios. We saved WISPs money and made it easier for WISPs to meet
the rules.
Question 1. If WISPA develops an industry standard which meets all the
technical and legal requirements of the law, will law enforcement accept
our data stream from whatever standard we develop?
Question 2. Will your office allow us to have a system or process
certified as being CALEA
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, John Scrivner wrote:
Question 1. If WISPA develops an industry standard which meets all
the technical and legal requirements of the law, will law
enforcement accept our data stream from whatever standard we
develop?
In addition to this, how about adding the idea of
Mark said:
So, you think the big guys aren't going to lobby for things that benefit
them, while we have no voice or consideration because don't have billions to
lobby with?
We have people going to D.C. to meet with the FBI directly to help get
this all worked out. How much more
I have not spent one penny on CALEA yet. I know I will but I bet it will
not be much and I bet this will all look like sky is falling dialog
when it is all said and done. I remember the day that K-Mart said they
were going to give away free dialup nationwide. I think that was around
2000. Now
Harold,
As with your other products, this is certified with the FCC with your
antennas, correct?
Thanks,
Scriv
Harold Bledsoe wrote:
Actually we have recently added an LNA to this product that boosts the
receive sensitivity to -91 @ 11Mbps (same as the DLB25xx). We haven't
had time to
What can you tell us about the mediation box? Is this something we can
build a few of as WISPA and send to members who need it?
Thanks,
Scriv
Jeff Broadwick wrote:
Actually, the standard for connecting the mediation box to the LEA (known as
LAES) has been finalized. The standard for
Me as well, if you didn't imply that from the private email this morning.
Sandhills Wireless, LLC
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
Tim Wolfe wrote:
Get me in there!.
Include me in WISPA 445 Filing
WaveCrazy Communications
Rick Herrmann wrote:
Include me in WISPA 445 Filing
Zing LLC
WISPA is working with the FBI and others to develop a plan for all of
us. One of the first things we will do is request an extension of the
deadline since the requirements have not even been fully developed yet.
Scriv
Martha Huizenga wrote:
So what are people who are filing doing to become
Butch,
Here's a decient paper based on the european version of calea.
http://www.aqsacomna.com/us/articles/LIIPWhitePaperv21.pdf
Ed
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:33:55 -0600 (CST)
Butch Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SO..for a WISPA built mediation box, you could simply put together
a Linux server
John Scrivner said I think we can assume from this point forward that
Mark wants nothing to do with this effort other than to derail the
process if possible. I assure you we are trying to do our best to
balance the needs of the government and the needs of our WISP operators
who we serve.
John -
Let me ask a stupid question. Why is it not the FEDS job to translate
data as they see fit? George, please ask that question when you see the
FBI. This one is very important to me. I am also copying our attorney,
Kris Twomey, on this particular issue. This sounds like a bunch of
crapola if
The list of those to include on the WISPA group 445 filing has been sent
to Kris Twomey who is our attorney for CALEA issues. If others here wish
to be included you will need to contact me via telephone at 618-237-2387
as soon as possible to be included. If you are a WISPA Principal Member
Anthony,
I hate to burst your bubble.
This is a quote from the following page;
http://www.fcc.gov/calea/
Common carriers, facilities-based broadband Internet access providers,
and providers of interconnected Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP)
service – all three types of entities are
If you are a paid member of WISPA and your company is not listed below or needs
edited please let me know immediately. This is the final edited list of those
which will be included in the 445 filing unless I hear something right away
from others. My cell number is 618-237-2387 if you email me
Please help me welcome Chris and Kathryn Cooper of Intelliwave LLC. They
are one of WISPA's newest Principal Members. We have quite a run of new
membership of late. We thank each and every one of you for taking this
important step to help show support for your industry. WISPA is the
voice of
One thing I noticed is the state lists aren't mentioned or linked from
the web pages at www.wispa.org.
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
Rick Harnish wrote:
As most of you know, we have a mailing list for every state designed
specifically for WISPs to communicate with each other on a more local
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Don Annas wrote:
Thank you very much for the clarification. I have also noticed
that we have MUCH better luck w/ the GIG RB syncing w/ a gig port
on the Cisco 2960.
This is good news, too. I wonder if it is because of the chipsets
that are used for the Cisco or on the
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Rick Harnish wrote:
Please respect each other's opinions and avoid personal attacks of
any nature. We have a challenge presented to us (CALEA) and we
My comments were personal attacks and I should not have done that
on the lists. They were intended to offset the FUD
Hello all!
I am looking at leasing space on the ground or on a tower owned by WA
State Department of Natural Resources.
When I look at the leasing brochure they list wireless broadband
providers and cellular telephone carriers as a you must negotiate
rate.
So.. do any of you have
Butch,
We are in total agreement. The prices I quoted are very out of line,
typical get it while the getting's good pricing. Competition will solve
that. You are working on a solution as well as others. I commend all
vendors who see an opportunity here in the WISP and small ISP market niche.
The form does not mean that you are compliant. It's simply to let the FCC
know where you are at in the process. Just tell them where you are at in
getting compliant. You need to tell them what your plan is.
Laters,
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Martha Huizenga [EMAIL
John,
I'm sorry but I just read this email thread. If it's not too late,
please include me in the 445 filing.
Thanks, Jim in KC
Jim Stout
LTO Communications, LLC
15701 Henry Andrews Dr
Pleasant Hill, MO 64080
(816) 305-1076 - Mobile
(816) 497-0033 - Pager
- Original Message -
Hiya Forbes,
I tried calling you but you didn't answer. All I got was a message from a
poor lost sole lamenting the loss of a loved one!
baawhahahahahahahahahhaa
ducking
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
If you guys want to be listed on the WISPA joint 445 filing and you were
not in this first round 445 filing we sent earlier today then please get
paid up and send me your request. It should say Include 'your company
name' in the WISPA 445 Addendum. I will accept additions until noon on
Friday
38 matches
Mail list logo
