We are trying to use Simple Queues to rate limit some of our hardwired
clients in the building and are having some problems with the faster
connections. Using the routerboard 532, we are trying to limit a client to
a 10mb x 10mb connection. Their is not much traffic on the box and the
processor i
Hello Don,
If you are running current firmware (v2.9.3x or greater) under the Simple
Queue Advanced tab try changing the Queue Type to "Ethernet-default".
We have seen more accurate bandwidth limiting using the Ethernet-default
setting.
YMMV, but worth a try.
Best,
Brad
-Original Messa
Before ordering direct, does anyone have a Trango 900 AP, new or used,
that they are interested in selling?
Contact me off-list with details of so.
Thanks,
Cliff
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://li
fyi
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)WISP Operator since 1999!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message -
From: "Dennis Sever
Maybe I should go to the pawnshop and get me six harnesses, one for
everyday of the week, that way I won't wear them out and I can keep them
for ten years at only a fraction of the cost. I still don't know what
those brownish marks were on the last one I got from the pawnshop. Looks
like dried-
All,
I am sure some of you have already thought of this but I would suggest a
great alternative to avoid interference with the most common frequencies
used to deploy wireless networks would be to use DECT cordless phones in
the house. They use the 1.9Ghz frequency and are relatively inexpensiv
We ran into this in our office, a couple of the headset units we have
are 2.4 ghz freq. hopping units and the linksys waps we use(d) would die
every time a phone call came through. We also have one DECT headset that
causes no problems. On another note, I am using another AP currently
that uses an A
Marty,
Pardon the naivity, but what prevents the SR9s from being legal? I am
looking at deploying these in RB 133C's.
Jim
Jim Stout
LTO Communications, LLC
15701 Henry Andrews Dr
Pleasant Hill, MO 64080
(816) 305-1076 - Mobile
(816) 497-0033 - Pager
- Original Message -
From
We have a Panasonic cordless phone system and a linksys router in the
office. No problems with either unit at any time.
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)WISP Operator since 1999!
[EMAIL PROTECT
I'm looking for some fixed value attenuators for doing some equipment
testing. Say 30-40db, N-connectors.
I'm also looking for a couple N-connector T's.
Anyone know where I can find these?
--
Blair Davis
AOL IM Screen Name -- Theory240
West Michigan Wireless ISP
269-686-8648
A division of
Blair,
You can find them here:
http://www.jfwindustries.com/fixed.html
jack
Blair Davis wrote:
I'm looking for some fixed value attenuators for doing some equipment
testing. Say 30-40db, N-connectors.
I'm also looking for a couple N-connector T's.
Anyone know where I can find these?
-
Blair,
You can find the attenuators here:
http://www.jfwindustries.com/fixed.html
You should be able to get the T's at the same place you get your N
connectors.
jack
Blair Davis wrote:
I'm looking for some fixed value attenuators for doing some equipment
testing. Say 30-40db, N-connector
Jim,
To be legal, the SR9 card needs to be part of a certified system
(wireless card, motherboard, case, and antenna). Just using the card in
your own custom-made system, even though the card itself has an FCC ID
number, is not enough to make your system (FCC Part 15) legal.
jack
Jim Stout
I have a unit like this one from Ebay. 7613384406
The only difference I can see is my unit has a N
male on one side, and a N female on the other.
$50.00
I also have a HP 11852A shown as
http://www.teknetelectronics.com/Search.asp?p_ID=15559&pDo=DETAIL&HP%20-%20AGILENT_11852A
Again, $50.00
B
My apologies, this was not intended to go out on the list.
- Original Message -
From: "Blake Bowers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Attenuators
I have a unit like this one from Ebay.
Are they legal to use unlicensed in the US, and ...do you have a URL? :)
Thanks
George
Dawn DiPietro wrote:
All,
I am sure some of you have already thought of this but I would suggest a
great alternative to avoid interference with the most common frequencies
used to deploy wireless networks
How many lines in does this system have?
I am dealing with an insurance company who is treating my wife and they
want her to use a cordless headset (shoulder injury). Well we have the
business line, the voip line and the homeline, and soon another business
line. so we are now looking at a 4line
We welcome Ty Carter with Lightwave Communications to WISPA. It appears
that Lightwave is making a big play in the North Caroline area. We all
appreciate your involvement in WISPA and hope our mutual efforts will
benefit your company and our industry. Here is some information about Ty
Carter an
I deployed a DECT (Digital European Cordless Telecommunications) system with
450 handsets several years ago.
The phones were single line units made by Phillips. They system worked OK,
but the features were very lacking. The frequency range was 1880-1900 MHz
This deployment was in Paris, France a
Don Annas of Triad Telecom has joined WISPA as a new Principal Member.
Don is one of only a few WISPs who started out as a VOIP company and
then moved into being a WISP. This is the reverse of what many here
face. There is going to be some good information shared between Don and
our group I am
I know that Hello Direct (hellodirect.com) carries some DECT products.
Best, Ted
Edward J. Hatfield III, President
E.J. Hatfield & Company
-Original Message-
From: George Rogato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 12:15 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Us
.. There are also now dual-mode DECT/Skype phones, which I like the look of
...
Also, in EU DECT is very popular for cordless home phones, and they have
nice looks/features.
[helpful post, BTW, Ralph]
Best regards
Stephen Patrick
CableFree Solutions
www.cablefreesolutions.com
-Original Me
>I haven't seen but one DECT phone here and it was very basic, but I expect
>that the technology will quickly be expanded to products like the multi
>handset systems, etc that are getting popular from Uniden and all the
>others.
There's a reason you haven't seen these products here. I began searc
I avoid those pesky 2.4 GHz phones when I can. I had a Panasonic 2.4 GHz
in my house that would take me offline and mess with phone calls when
using the net. I have tried to always use 900 MHz phones with DSSS. Not
easy to find these days sadly. I was not aware of an unlicensed band at
1.9 GHz.
$50K up front and 50 cents a device to control an entire band in the US
sounds like a pretty cheap deal to me. I am surprised nobody jumped on
that. I do not see that as too much to pay and I am very surprised this
did not take off. I hate it when opportunity is right in front of my
face and I
Did you look at the UTAM URL? The fee until recently was $20 per
device A market killer if I've ever seen one, especially when the
manufacturing cost of a simple home phone is in that range! We'll see if this
changes now that the UTAM prices have gone down. My thoughts is that the
w
I have or at least had an attenuator that I got from YDI a few years
ago. It has a bunch of bat switches that you can adjust the loss in steps.
Jack Unger wrote:
Blair,
You can find the attenuators here:
http://www.jfwindustries.com/fixed.html
You should be able to get the T's at the same
George,
If I recall correctly, that was a pretty good unit that was usable up to
about 2.4 GHz. I don't know if Blair needs that kind of dB-by-dB control
or not but if he does, I think I can find a link (I'll have to dig hard)
to the company that manufactured that model.
jack
George Rogato
Do you have a link to the rules governing how this spectrum can be used,
how it is licensed, who you have to pay what to use it, etc.? I would
like to research this in more detail. Is this opportunity still
available or is this spectrum now gone elsewhere? Is this what DECT is
using? Did they p
Depending on your perspective of what "unregulated" means, here is a
quote from IPTelephony.org regarding a vote at the FCC which I would
assume is good news for us. At least it could mean we will not get any
more new regulation for a while:
Despite a split in opinion over net neutrality regul
I just can't tell if they mean Cellular or Wireless or both. (I don't
think they know either).
Wireless Internet an Information Service, FCC Says
http://www.phoneplusmag.com/hotnews/73h2210431.html
Posted on: 03/22
It would be good for all WISPs read this and start to consider their
position and their response.
http://www.neca.org/wawatch/wwpdf/032207_3.pdf
--
Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
FCC License # PG-12-25133
Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
Author
first impression, is that the FCC's looking to set prices.
"nondiscrimination" pops up a lot... blegh!
You mean Al Gore didn't invent all this ? /faint/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 5:04
Hey everyone,
Jack Unger and myself have started this group to create a process of
getting uncertified systems certified.
The reason for the certification is to help bring wisps into compliance
and legitimize their operation.
Recently a wisp reported that he had an FCC inspector do an inspecti
http://www.neca.org/wawatch/wwpdf/032207_3.pdf
Sounds like some users are complaining that thee p2p software does not
run as fast as it should. Could be devastating to some of us small
operators if we cannot throttle p2p services back somewhat. We are
still paying over 400$ per T1 circuit. No
All,
The link below is the DECT phone system I was speaking about earlier.
http://tinyurl.com/2l2ktq
We use these phones on our VOIP service and have all the features we need.
Regards,
Dawn DiPietro
On 3/22/07, John Scrivner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you have a link to the rules governing
Check out www.utam.org. They really do a fairly good job of describing why
they were created, what they did, and what companies desiring to use the
cleared spectrum must do (pay). Whenever the topic of trying to understand the
1.9GHz spectrum that the FCC allocated for UL use, this is an impor
This site has some DECT products...
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/dect/
John
John Scrivner wrote:
$50K up front and 50 cents a device to control an entire band in the
US sounds like a pretty cheap deal to me. I am surprised nobody jumped
on that. I do not see that as too much to pay and I am ve
I'm looking for a 120 degree sector antenna that is 900 MHz Horizontal (or
vertical) and 2.4 GHz dual band.
I know of some 900/2.4 vertical 30 degree sectors, but I need no less than
120 degrees for this app.
Has anyone any idea who might make such an animal?
Ralph
--
WISPA Wireles
Prices are creeping up on T1 because ILEC's are unregualted on special
access circuits - the very copper T1 that runs the loop to your door.
ILEC's are unregulated on fiber and special access.
And in 2 markets QWest doesn't have to sell loops at all. If VZ gets its
petition this year, in 6 Eas
Good thing backhaul radios are getting cheap! grin
- Original Message -
From: "Peter R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Launches Inquiry Into Broadband Market Practices
Prices are creeping up on T1 because
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:11:13 -0800, George Rogato wrote
> Hey everyone,
>
> Jack Unger and myself have started this group to create a process of
> getting uncertified systems certified.
>
> The reason for the certification is to help bring wisps into compliance
> and legitimize their operation.
>
42 matches
Mail list logo
