Right on schedule, its time for the 802.11 vs Canopy crusades.
If you deploy it right, you should be able to get about 40-50 subs on
802.11 based APs. If your application is going to require higher
density than that, go with Canopy, as you can probably get 120-150 per
AP before they max out.
Depends on how you build it. The backhauls are bridged, but there is
routing between key backhaul points (I make triangles)
Every tool has its place and used right, works well.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists
li...@manageisp.com wrote:
When to route? From the very
On that note, I have a few questions.
On those 40-50 802.11 subs, what kind of bandwidth are the users
seeing/are you selling them?
Do you count a polling MAC on a 802.11 chipset, say Ubiquiti AirMax,
in with 802.11?
My assumption would be that with a polling MAC on 802.11 chips you
should see
My soon to be 4 and 7 yo boys have iMacs. They are locked down and
just do not know about that stuff yet. I removed
access to the web browser in the PSP cause the oldest found it. He
does not know how to use it (or so I think). The best
parents can do these days is be very proactive which you seam
Speak firmly and borrow that big stick from Roosevelt when necessary.
Fear of God is useless but Fear of Dad is profound. I raised 5 kids,
youngest is 32, still works, no stick necessary, they just know where i
keep it.
Frank
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
Hi All,
Here's the scenario. My kids
Upgraded the AP and all CPE to Beta 5 this morning and latency still
sucks. Signal is a -57 on one side and -59 on the other. Every one
of our VoIP customers on this tower is complaining.
attachment: graph_image.php.png
Marlon, this is a topic that I speak on in local churches, Kiwanis, and such.
There are free apps like getk9.com that is completely free and locks down a
PC's browsing. Then you can use user account controls in windows vista and Win7
to keep them from over-ridding your settings. But none of
To All;
My contact at the NTIA has asked me to provide a list of the
states who have been asking WISP's to provide a list of the customer
addresses. I know a few of you have mentioned this but I wasn't keeping
track. Could you post or send me your experiences and I will forward
Hey marlon,
Sigh...mine is finally 18!
However, I totally understand the situation and had to cope with it myself.
I employed a key logger.
~V~
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Wednesday, April
We use Bluecoat K9 and are very happy with it so far.
My 14 and 13 year olds have Facebook accounts...under the condition that my
wife and I are friended and have their passwords so that we can log in as
them at any time.
I found out that my son had a Google mail account a while back that he did
Forgot to mention (like Victoria said) KeyLogger best I've found
http://www.covenanteyes.com/ but it's not free. It can be put on a PC and the
user never knows that its on there you just get an email as to what that pc
did. Still wont stop the Zune.
Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi Wireless Internet
I tried to help a customer get Yahoo to delete her email account and it took
us almost an entire year to get some action. No, they wouldn't delete it,
they would only LOCK it. And that, sadly enough, took a letter from her
attorney.
As I've heard many times, there is no delete button on the
Hello,
I'm trying to provide wireless Internet to a local festival this summer.
My plan is to set up temporary APs as there isn't any coverage in that
area already. I don't have any towers in the area (or any at all) so my
thoughts are that I would have to talk some local building owners into
I have also used opendns for personal home use and for a corporate
customer that wanted control over their Internet. It is solid and does
what you need it to do.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 14, 2010, at 7:28 AM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com wrote:
Marlon, this is a topic that I speak on in
Brian,
I am aware of the following:
. Ohio Contact: ConnectOhio Sweet, Dave [dsw...@connectohio.org]
. Michigan Contact: ConnectMichigan Terry Holmes
[te...@tholmes.net]
. Oregon Contact: Brian Scaffidi [brian.scaff...@broadmap.com]
. Pennsylvania
YES! I've told many, many people.. If you want to keep your kids safe,
no laptops, desktops that can't be lugged around and keep them all in a
central, common area in the home. We have a computer repair business so we
see everything. And I mean EVERYTHING! What is the number one favorite
Brian,
Correction, I do not know which ones have asked for customer addresses
specifically.
Sorry about the quick submit button.
Rick
Brian,
I am aware of the following:
. Ohio Contact: ConnectOhio Sweet, Dave [dsw...@connectohio.org]
.
Have you posted this on the Ubiquiti forums? The developers will work
with you to determine the issue you are seeing, will make the product
better for all of us.
Regards
Michael Baird
Upgraded the AP and all CPE to Beta 5 this morning and latency still
sucks. Signal is a -57 on one side and
Around here there are some kids with live linux on key drives they boot into
to keep things private. Set your boot order to not have USB or CD in the
boot order and put an admin password on the bios.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
If it's a festival, the shop owners benefit from such a thing and there is
probably a committee that would do the footwork for you. Talk to the
festival committee. Shouldn't take much of anything to do what you're
trying to accomplish.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From:
Here's one...
Dawn Clark, Project Coordinator
Connected Nation, Inc.
dcl...@connectednation.org
Cell: 270.791.3308
Direct: 270.846.7622
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Rick Harnish
Sent: Wednesday, April 14,
Those kids will then install Ubuntu using Wubi (if they have admin
rights), have the back-door bios passwords somewhere, or start
charring around a HDD and screwdriver.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
Around here there are some kids with live linux
No. It is impossible to get the same number of subs on a polling MAC
(UBNT, Trango) as with Canopy. The reason is that Canopy does their
scheduling in hardware, not software.
Mikrotik attempted to make their system handle more than 30 subs by
improving the polling code, but they said it was as
Satellite at 5mbps? Not going to happen.
Mobile cards will be quicker but very area dependant.
On 4/14/10, Charles Hooper choo...@plumata.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to provide wireless Internet to a local festival this summer.
My plan is to set up temporary APs as there isn't any coverage
When you say no coverage, are you meaning there is NO internet access there
or that you have no coverage yourself with wireless? If internet is indeed
available there via a wire, then the rest is easy.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
You got it! But hey, I was the same way back in the day but then it was red
boxing and phone hacking. (Ohio Bell made regular calls to my mother
requesting her to have me take whatever it was off the line. My nemesis at the
phone company eventually became a good friend when I got older) If
We have seen a lot of this actually. For small trailer parks or neighborhood
blocks that can't see a tower. Basically, have a Moto SM go to a rooftop that
can reach the AP and then put a NS2 behind it pointing in the direction of a
group of houses that you normally can't see. Put the NS2 in
No coverage myself with wireless, I apologize for the confusion.
-Original Message-
From: Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:25am
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mobile or Temporary Internet?
When you say no
Marlon asked: So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control
your kids these days?
I taught them respect for others. I taught them to treat the janitor the
same as they'd treat the principal. I taught them to befriend the
friendless.
I taught them honesty and integrity, and
Well, for temp access I'm sure some of the businesses have internet, piggy
back onto them and set a bandwidth limit so as not to suck them dry. Again,
a festival committee could probably line them up for you and they could be
added as a sponsor of the free wireless internet. Depending on the
You could always send them back to Russia with a note saying you no longer
want them. Right?
Obscure news story. sorry.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:41 AM
To:
After getting 4 kids into their 20's, and learning from my
own mistakes (A LOT of them) this is what I have come up
with.
TRUST.
As soon as you expressly forbid them to do something, you have
waived that red flag in front of them, and they will find a way.
And you know, with the Zunes, Ipods,
Yesterday my 13 year old son made me proud for about 10 seconds when we were
working on a project for school. The paper asked, Who has been the biggest
influence in your life?. He says, My Dad! with a big grin. The wife is
all happy too and asks why and he points to his belly. Cause I eat what
Drop in your own bandwidth, and run off generator of batteries. WE ran
an entire festival over a weekend off 4 car batteries, and a 30 foot
push up pole :)
---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, Mikrotik Certified Trainer, MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE,
MTCTCE,
Marlon,
I think the issues you have here are common ones wether or not computers,
hotmail, myspace or facebook are involved. They are just parent child
issues.
I used to be a technology coordinator for a school district. If you place
security software on the machines, it will be worked around in
I have to echo Mike's sentiments on this subject. If a kid is motivated,
they will find a way around any technical barrier that you put in place to
stop them from posting/texting/sexting/etc. There are public computers,
cell-phones, ipod/ipads, thumb drives, and damn near a million ways to get
Nice, Matt, nice...
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Matt Larsen - Lists li...@manageisp.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 5:50 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org; nnsq...@nnsquad.org;
If YOU came to me about something your kid was doing on MY system *I* would
try to help you out as much as I could.
But then again, I'm not a mega corp either. To me your kid is more valuable
than the money I'd loose by running off a few customers.
marlon
- Original Message -
Washington asked for a lot of info. I wouldn't give it to them so I don't
remember exactly what they wanted
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Brian Webster bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org; memb...@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010
We taken the other route. My son got his own domain, he got his own e-mail
for his domain. Allowed him a Facebook account he have to have us as friends
and we know the password. I get a copy (unknown by him) of any e-mails going
to his e-mail account. We had the talk about proper online behavior
I worked at the MSN SOC (Service Operations Center) for a short while where
requests like the one you listed below come in.
Our hands were tied. There are specific hoops we had to jump through for ANY
request of this type.
Basically, there is a law enforcement fax number that goes to corporate
Maine has asked for it. I'll try to get some details privately emailed
to you.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 08:28:46AM -0400, Brian Webster wrote:
To All;
My contact at the NTIA has asked me to provide a list of the
states who have been asking WISP's to provide a list of the
Ok granted I should have seen that response. I meant to phrase is in a
business way, i failed. My point is that $corp liability
will trump $random.person in most cases. It also was not about running
of customers but about the liability of actions. The
more mom pop like a company, the more likely
Maybe we should just have a WISPA Standard.
I propose we have Brian (or someone else) whip up a quick web-page that we
can put our coverage areas on.
Then WISPA can just submit that data to the state agencies on our behalf.
Then WISPA becomes a clearing house for WISP information... this may
In my discussions with CN, all they wanted was tower information. Location,
frequency, equipment types, etc. I worked with the people previously
mentioned on the list.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
In Ohio they are asking basically for your oversubscription weight. Here is
the paragraph exactly as it appears on the form:
[per NTIA]: A providers subscriber-weighted nominal speed (in kbps) should
be calculated as the sum of the products of the providers advertised
maximum download data
I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing but
poor signal, dropped packets, low throughput. Replacing them with
regular units fix the issue. What gives?
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Forbes Mercy
For what it is worth, it looks like the issue of liability and disclosure of
private information is a concern to ISPs as they are faced with parent/child
relations. Maybe an effective solution to this matter would be to modify
your terms-of-service to indicate that (1) accounts may not be opened
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.netwrote:
Yeah, funny, does not look like we are making much progress after 18 years
does it.
Maybe it has something to do with the love affair most in this industry have
with focusing their plans over and over again on
You've probably seen plenty of things on my FB that would make a father
cringe. ;-)
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Jeff Broadwick jeffl...@comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 7:50 AM
I've been using home runs from the CPE to the POE unit but considering
using a demarc on the outside of the building for easier access. So,
I figure I may as well put LP protection there while I'm at it. Anyone
have a line on a good LP with ethernet access that will fit into a
small enclosure?
Bad firmware and poor compatibility with legacy protocols. Make sure you
upgrade them to the absolute latest beta available on the forums.
Regards
Michael Baird
I've been using regular Bullets and NS2's which have been working
great. So, I thought I'd give the M units a try. So far, nothing
I see language occasionally, but nothing particularly dirty. I put those
things in different categories. I am really surprised how many people use 4
letter words on f/b though.
Regards,
Jeff
Jeff Broadwick
ImageStream
800-813-5123 x106 (US/Can)
+1 574-935-8484 x106 (Int'l)
Great example? Apparently you haven't seen the pictures. :-p
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Ryan Spott rsp...@cspott.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:12 AM
To: WISPA General List
What are some of the specifics that you came across.
There are some known issues to watchout for...
Best use the Ubiquiti Antenna's...
The Panels have built in Electrical downtilt in them.
There some strange issues with older firmware...5.1.2 seems to be more
stable the previous ones.
Depending
I've went to using all AirGrids for my normal CPE installs, using the Nanos
for esthetics where we don't want a more visible grid. They've worked great
for us. I installed a 27dbi this past weekend that is 6 miles out and on
the lower end of the Fresnel but after the 5.1.5 firmware it behaves
One of the real advantages I've found with K9 (and I'm sure just about any
other service) is how it locks searches into the filtered mode.
You can do the most innocent of searches and get some hard core stuff if the
results are unfiltered.
Regards,
Jeff
Jeff Broadwick
ImageStream
If you are an IKANO reseller you can order a contract-less DSL to a nearby
address but I would partner with one or more local businesses to use their
Internet. Satellite will work so poorly nobody will use the service and it's
rediculously expensive.
Set up a SilverLining account and use
That's because the WiMAX vendors want more to deliver less. No WiMAX for me
until APs are $500, CPE are $150, and deliver over 50 megabits of capacity.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: John
Ok I've been watching this thread since its beginning and I have to say it
now,
..Come on over to myspace, twitter my yahoo, till I google on your
facebook
Lol :)
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From:
How could they get damaged? They use this to transport them from Asia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crawler-transporter
ryan
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:
Would you rather something get damaged in shipping?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Upgraded to version 5.1.2 prior to installation. Still poor
performance. Not using Mimo mode. Using as an AP on a repeater. Having
no luck connecting to it with another M unit as CPE. Think its a bad
radio(s)?
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com wrote:
Bad firmware
...not using MIMO mode ... ? what antenna are you using ?
Using the Rocket M5 without the Ubiquiti Antenna's is like driving a
sports car with all flat tires :)
There is a good documentation on the UBNT forum on how to verify the
bad/defective units
Testing them , have two units sync/link
Pay attention to your cable runs as well. That 5v PoE sucks, I've been
using variable voltage adapters into a power injector and adjust the voltage
depending on how it's acting. Sometimes, if the voltage is on the low side
for the cable run, the unit will power up but act stupid but if I hit it
5V is only an issue with the Airgridsthe others (Rockets and Nanos )
are using 24v or 15v power supplies.
And yes, if you are using the Airgirds, pay attention to the cable run
Faisal.
On 4/14/2010 11:41 AM, Robert West wrote:
Pay attention to your cable runs as well. That 5v PoE
I have not had a chance to get field experience with the Canopy 430. I
have a few areas I would like to use it, but am afraid to destroy the
frequency of some of my other 5Ghz backhauls.
Regards,
Chuck Hogg
Shelby Broadband
502-722-9292
ch...@shelbybb.com
http://www.shelbybb.com
-Original
I was referring to the 10 pack of 27dbi Rick said he couldn't get to work
correctly. But yes, the others are doing 15v and 24v, however, from the
recommendation of UBNT, 24V is what should be used now, not the 15V.
They've had some issues with the 15V not providing enough power even on
short
It's all getting a bit confusing... I thought it was Forbes who had
purchased the 10packs of Airgrids and Nanobridges...
To the best of my short re-collection, Rick G has not stated what model
of M units he was/ is testing...
Regardless, Robert you are correct about the power supplies...
You correct, my error. It was Forbes with the AirGrids. Sometimes
multi-tasking isn't easy!
:)
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:57 AM
To: WISPA General List
Marlon, thats right and this is a major issue with our society today -
everyone is claiming to be watching out for our kids but nobody really
is. Do it for the kids has been the social motto for years now but
when you look at the things being done (or not) it makes your head
swim. I'm not a
LOL! That's why they called them Rockets!
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Ryan Spott rsp...@cspott.com wrote:
How could they get damaged? They use this to transport them from Asia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crawler-transporter
ryan
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Josh Luthman
Sorry, I want clear. Thats what I get for hijacking the thread :)
I'm not using Rockets - just plain old Bullets Nanos with regular antennas.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
...not using MIMO mode ... ? what antenna are you using ?
Using the Rocket
. NanoM ? or just plain Nano ?
I have no experience with the plain Nano, but would suggest that you
visit the UBNT forum and do a bit of pokeing arround, would not be
surprised if there were firmware related issues...
My playing has only been with the M grear. Their 2x2 MIMO M grear is
a
Holy crapwhere do I get one of those. That is one hell of a link you
have there.
Joe Miller
DSLbyAir, LLC
228-831-8881
www.dslbyair.com
- Original Message -
From: Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:59 AM
Damn!
Distance?
Whats the actual TCP/IP throughput on that?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Greg Ihnen
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:59 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no
Wish I could get speeds like that :)
Have a pair of NS2Ms set up right on on a P2P link to bridge between a
DOCSIS modem in a power supply cabinet to an employee that lives 3/4 mi away
LoS and can barely keep it up to 13 meg up/down... Running the latest
Beta... Doesn't help the noise floor
Two suggestions... Upgrade to the beta firmware and see if it helps
other... consider doing NS5M, if 2.4 is crowded...
Faisal.
On 4/14/2010 1:08 PM, AJ wrote:
Wish I could get speeds like that :)
Have a pair of NS2Ms set up right on on a P2P link to bridge between a
DOCSIS modem in a power
Yes, something like this... but in conjunction to the different RSSI,
you would also see a disparity in the TX/RX link.
reducing the power would end up exaggerating the difference..
Your units don't appear to have this problem... you also are running it
rather hot at -50 :)
You might consider
http://ubnt.com/nanostationm
http://ubnt.com/bulletm
I wanna get hooked too. I'm gonna drop UBNT for something else if
they dont improve soon.
Thanks!
-RickG
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
. NanoM ? or just plain Nano ?
I have no experience with
I'm on the latest beta firmware...
And swapping out $200 worth of gear to play on another band is
frustrating...
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.netwrote:
Two suggestions... Upgrade to the beta firmware and see if it helps
other... consider doing NS5M, if
Routing vs. Bridging is an easy discussion...
Bridge until you get a certain number of subs then route. Traffic
isolation, minimize broadcast storms, etc.
Route if you have multiple backhauls to a site.
However, I have heard of WISPs with thousands of subscribers bridging with
VLANs to do
...And swapping out $200 worth of gear to play on another band is
frustrating...
But isn't this what the WISP's live for !
:)
Comes with the territory. next time if you feel better about
swapping out $2000 worth of equipment, call me... I will sell you the
NS2M for $1000 each...
LOL !!
. Route from Day One. why pickup bad habits bridging .
:)
Faisal
On 4/14/2010 1:27 PM, Mark Nash - Lists wrote:
Routing vs. Bridging is an easy discussion...
Bridge until you get a certain number of subs then route. Traffic
isolation, minimize broadcast storms, etc.
Route if
LOL...
We're not exactly a WISP... Just looking for a cheaper solution than running
8000' of fiber to serve a single customer (free customer at that lol)...
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.netwrote:
...And swapping out $200 worth of gear to play on another band
MPLS/VPLS
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:34 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re:
Looks like my images got stripped out. Here's links to the images.
The distance is only about 500 or 600 yards, that's why I have the transmit
power turned way down.
Do you mean like this? Notice the rssi on the lower pic. These are two NS5Ms
setup as a backhaul. I was assuming the rssi is
If you are using the latest fw, use the airview spectrum analyzer to see
your local noise
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of AJ
Sent:
Opinion #1.
Anybody with large bridged systems?
- Original Message -
From: Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:34 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Routing / Bridging / VLAN Use
. Route from Day One. why pickup
You can also 'swap' them out for Ruckus Wireless Outdoor PTP 'n' Radios..
http://www.ruckuswireless.com/products/zoneflex-high-end/7731
More about $2-2.5K for a pair
Faisal.
On 4/14/2010 1:35 PM, AJ wrote:
LOL...
We're not exactly a WISP... Just looking for a cheaper solution than
It's about 500 to 600 meters. The indicated throughput using the speed test
tool from the web gui says 65Mbps both directions. But I like the 162 number
better! : - )
Greg
On Apr 14, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Jerry Richardson wrote:
Damn!
Distance?
Whats the actual TCP/IP throughput on that?
I'm in the Amazon jungle. Our only noise here is from the sun.
Greg
On Apr 14, 2010, at 12:38 PM, AJ wrote:
Wish I could get speeds like that :)
Have a pair of NS2Ms set up right on on a P2P link to bridge between a
DOCSIS modem in a power supply cabinet to an employee that lives 3/4 mi
I'm running the latest beta. Distance is around 500 meters.
I can drop the TX power another 20dbm and the rssi only goes down a few db.
Right now I dropped it to 7dbm and the rssi only dropped to -55. I'd like to
get to -65 but I'd have to skew the units and there's so many metal buildings
I didn't mean to sound short or rude with this last message. I mean no
disrespect. I've been networking for 25 years... Novell servers, MS, IP
networks, blah blah blah.
It's just that I expected this response, but I want to INVITE other
opinions.
- Original Message -
From: Mark
Bridge/VLAN can easily become a nightmare to manage. I have helped 5+
customers get away from this method...and their management of the
network became easier.
With VLAN's you are not minimizing the broadcast traffic and other
potentials. This is also a small waste of wireless spectrum.
The
Go to the 5ghz version and you'll probably fly!
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of AJ
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:09 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT M Was: Ubiquiti made no points today
We are primarily a PPPoE shop and run a bridged system for that reason.
Each AP has it's own VLAN bridged back to the core. We've done this for
many years without a single issue.
We have different service offerings like VOIP, PPPoE, DHCP, PTPVPN and
even extend our metro ethernet across our
Noisy... the M series are dual pol so they require both polarities to be
clean
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of AJ
Sent: Wednesday, April
Hey AJ.
I am curious.
Turn on Airmax.
Reduce Channel size to 10mhz or 5mhz
And see if things improve...
Faisal.
On 4/14/2010 2:09 PM, AJ wrote:
Here is the upper portion of the band running Airview - it's roughly the
same across the entire 2.3-2.7 band that the NS2M can scan, of course
Eric, how many clients / tower sites / APs are you serving this way?
Do you expect it to scale to double/triple your size now?
- Original Message -
From: Eric Muehleisen ericm...@gmail.com
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Routing /
Current stable setup is Airmax on, 10 Mhz channel, freq 2417 (channel 2).
Noise floor varies -96 to -83 dBm
Signal RX from station -59 to -67
TX/RX 13 Mbps
CCQ 100%
Speedtest shows 2.88 Mbps RX, 1.94 Mbps TX
Airmax turned off
Noise floor varies -96 to -85 dBm
Signal RX from station -60
ACK 51
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
