I knew I could count on you to demonstrate complete ignorance of What Should
Be, Because It Once Was.
The founders would curse you for having no understanding.
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
I
There was a time, Marlon, when I would have agreed with you. Except that I've
been paying attention for a quite a few years... "compromise" is what got us
to this. Not galloping, leaps and bounds, unhindered statism, but the exact
compromise you are talking about - it ALWAYS goes in one dir
As the anniversary of my full 8th year actively in the wireless internet
business is here, I decided to make some comments. My interest in wireless
internet, and actual efforts to actually start doing it are now 14 years old.
Yes, really, it was that long ago. And I'm feeling much older the
ad to hear someone up there in DC is listening. Did you happen to mention
anything about our need of access to TVWS?
Scriv
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:56 PM, MDK wrote:
Monday morning I got a phone call from a 202 number and answered it. The
name sounded vaguely familiar, but he finally
atively impacts my
> network as I now have more resources used and I gain no additional
> revenue. It also sets the precedent that the acceptable use policy does
> not need to be adhered to.
>
> On 11/1/11 12:38 PM, MDK wrote:
>> I don't do anything. I will do tech support
Monday morning I got a phone call from a 202 number and answered it. The
name sounded vaguely familiar, but he finally identified himself as the
assistant to my congressman. Ahh, now I know why I recognize the name.
Been in politics around here for many years. State and federal.
Thursday
I don't do anything. I will do tech support ONLY for the paying person, and
won't respond to complaints of "slow" or anything else.
Am I losing money? Mulitple perspectives; 1. I've got a customer that
pays a bill. 2. if I prohibit it, there's probably not much chance they'll
all sign u
Tom:
I understand your position that we should respect authority, but there's
also the fact that sometimes, you have to stand up to people who are not
supposed to be doing what they're doing, even when in government office.
As far as it goes, I have nothing to lose, really. While the business
If I ever post anything in regards to it will be:
"Hey, FCC, I claim my Constitution right to be unencumbered by laws which
neither you nor Congress have any authority to write, go stick your head in
the sand!" Sincerely: John Q Public.
++
Neofast, Inc, Making i
The mythical starving Congresscritter has never been located. If one had ever
been found, I'd be prepared to agree with you. But, since most of them are
far wealthier than you and I have any chance to be, then I'd say this is
invalid.
The fact of the matter, is that issue at hand is who hol
The thing is, he has no constitutional authority for ANY of this.
Instead, we have the three blind mice trying to make the country work. WE
know what we're doing and how to get it done. They need to respect that they
don't know squat and need to get the heck out of the way.
+
Mark, you seem to think that what I'm advocating is a 'dream' or some kind of
old fashioned fantasy. To correct your mistake here, I must point out that the
"system" you seem to want to continue has brought this nation to the brink of
bankrtuptcy, destroyed our industrial and scientific base, o
+100 Rick. And it is this fundamental philosophical perspective that I am
asking WISPA to answer - what is the official position? If there is none,
then are all the positions and statements and arguments just convenient at the
moment? Does WISPA advocate for things that will result in highe
Ok, lets get this in perspective. I am one, uno, sole, lone person. While
I believe I am right, I am NOT interested in saying I have a right to impose
my views on all this stuff on all the other members of WISPA. Two years
ago, I asked, prodded, and then nagged, to see if WISPA would volunt
A "plan of action"? If I said "this is what WISPA should do" and laid it
out in detail, all you'd do is say "who are you? Why should we hacve to do
what you say?"
Frankly, I have no idea why you're having difficulty. You see, when you
have proper business principles as your guiding mechanism
Nice re-write of history, Forbes. Who are you trying to protect?
It is NOT Congress which has been the motivating factor behind the FCC's
anti-competitive behavior... It has been the administration and the people
that this administration have appointed and have hired, combined with a
small nu
Take what you read here with a grain of salt, the quality of articles is
variable. However, that at some level, the hearings were a sham, is not
to be disputed.
When partisans, who are motivated to implement political ideology, over
stewardship of public assets, are appointed to office... th
I made a small donation, as well. Come on guys, I know a lot of you are
better off than me. We should be able to make an adequate fund in 2 days
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
From: MDK
If possible, the idea would be in cases where insurance is likely to eventually
compensate, it could act as a loan, and the fund is replenished whenever
insurance finally cuts a check. Where there is not going to be insurance,
perhaps the operator can agree to future payments for partial repay
If you speak to to Walden, thank him for his efforts. He's my congressman and
has been at the very front of this the whole time.
Thanks
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
From: Tom DeReggi
Sent: Su
operation of the Internet and the businesses that provide it.
Rick
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of MDK
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 1:09 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] net neutrality... Two articles...
http://thehill.com/blogs/
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/147121-house-leadership-questions-why-industry-isnt-fighting-in-net-regs?tmpl=component&print=1&page=
Excerpt:
House GOP Whip Kevin McCarthy (Calif.) convened a meeting of top communications
companies on Wednesday morning, where he questioned wh
Careful Matt, someone might confuse you and me, if you keep up this attitude
Just a friendly warning
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
From: Matt Larsen - Lists
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 8:50 PM
T
Matt, I commend your thoughts, and how you chose to write them. I always
admire people who speak clearly, but from the heart.
I would like to add something, or perhaps just explain why I think this
industry will never become the domain of a few large players. Our industry
requires a dedica
Please contact me offlist, by email, only...
mark at neofast dot net
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200
++
WISPA Wants You! Join t
d Spectrum Scanner software
for Ncards yet?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -----
From: MDK
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 2:16 PM
Subject: [WISPA] MIMO antenna cabling...
I'm in the
++
From: support
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 11:51 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MIMO antenna cabling...
10ft in RF cable is a Bad Idea I would put you board in a weather proof box and
put it next to your antennas
On 1/11/2011 1:16 PM, MDK wrote:
I
I'm in the position of wanting to test the Star-OS MIMO mode, and it occurs to
me that connecting an antenna through a few feet of cable may have some
pitfalls...
I'm going to use dual polarity antennas, and so I'm wondering if I need to use
very closely matching cable lengths for the cables th
To heck with the critics!
What do they know? Did anyone ask the people who know something, rather
than just the pointy-headed academics?
NN rules are a disaster waiting to happen, and "open access" is an
unsustainable model based on a pretend market.
He is absolutely right, however, competi
I've had my one test sector up for some time, and then it suddenly developed
ethernet issues.
I changed both cables and switch, and no joy.
I have the replacement rocket, just waiting for the moment I can get back up
there and replace it.
Since this is more common than it should be, I'm
ecember 30, 2010 9:57 AM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] bandwidth provider at Westin
> spectrumnet.us (aka condointernet)
> http://www.seattleix.net/ <- get on this! :)
> http://www.seattleix.net/participants.htm
>
>
> ryan
>
> On Thu, Dec
I'm looking for wholesale bandwidth providers located in Westin.. Anyone have
names / etc?
Thanks
Mark
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
RE: [WISPA] Wow- and how stimulus worksTo hopes your family can be together,
your health be good, your world have peace.
May the One who was born on whatever day it was, bless you and yours, and keep
you throughout the year so you may again reach other Christmas.
Mark
++
List'"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wow- and how stimulus works
> MDK- just for you. :-}
>
> -Or
>
> It is a slow day in the small Minnesota town of Marshall, and the streets
> are deserted. Times are tough, everybody is in debt, and everybody is
> living on credit.
>
You know, the thing about this, is that it would probably be GOOD, not bad.
It would eventually result in people noticing that data consumption is a
little like your water bill... The more you use, the more it costs.
These people believe that an ISP's connection to you is unlimited... All
you
: Thursday, December 23, 2010 12:06 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Flexible rules promised for wireless
At 12/23/2010 02:19 PM, MDK wrote:
That was the camel's nose in the tent, so to speak.
NN and content regulation is merely some more of the camel through the d
++
From: Mark Nash
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 11:41 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Flexible rules promised for wireless
Normally I don't open a message from MDK for fear of witnessing what I have
become accustomed to. It took me a few days to do it, but I
This business about "winning" and "losing"...
For me, "winning" is about being in charge of my life and my business. Who
has veto power over what I choose to do? Me. That's winning.
Losing: When someone else has veto power over any decision I make.
Example, the FCC decides which aspects
/22/2010 12:44 AM, RickG wrote:
The first step to breaking the net was form 477.
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:57 PM, MDK wrote:
The whole problem was creating monopolies in the first place, and then
pretending you can "fix" what you broke by half-baked notions of
g
re protected from competition for 100 years.
> You shouldn't be allowed to build your empire under protection, then
> take advantage of said situation. You should have never had that
> protection.
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-i
, MDK wrote:
Fred gave his reasons, which if I were to answer to, I'd have to quote him,
but the gist of what he said, was that the NEXT operator to come along would
have to pay MORE to compete than the original.
>Yes, to reach the first customer, as well as on a per-custom
Jeromie, my socialist (or was that anarchist, I can't ever remember) friend,
how are ya? I was thinking about making a run to a wrecking yard up that
way and stopping by to see how things were going.
Anyway, each time I read this "solution" it reminds me why it won't work.
Let's say I move to
41-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
From: David E. Smith
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 1:17 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Flexible rules promised for wireless
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 15:08, MDK wrote:
So, I disagree with his premise, and his arg
but if you listen to him with and
> open mind, at worst you will end up learning about a whole series of
> events that got us this point...
>
> And it is not due to some individual who went to Washington and Kissed
> someone !
>
> :)
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Inter
uot;Fred Goldstein"
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 11:43 AM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Flexible rules promised for wireless
> At 12/21/2010 01:57 PM, MDK wrote:
>
>>The whole problem was creating monopolies in the first place, and then
>>pretending y
The problem we have here, Faisal, is not about "constructive" criticism. I am
not arguing the value of policy X vs policy Y, but frustrated that the vast
majority of US, who have the most to lose, speak of these things in terms of
such inevitability, as if losing the battle against overreachin
Bob, that's about the truest comments on the matter...
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
From: Bob Moldashel
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 6:34 AM
To: li...@stlbroadband.com ; WISPA General List
Su
I'm sure you mean well, but I'm not even stirred up yet.
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
--
From: "Faisal Imtiaz"
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 6:27
The whole problem was creating monopolies in the first place, and then
pretending you can "fix" what you broke by half-baked notions of government
created markets...
There is NOTHING broke about 'internet' because it hasn't been regulated.
Your issue is nothing but a complaint about the result
mix of this (unlicensed is not bound to layer
> 1/2+ split, with some licensed being (like cellular) and some licensed
> not being bound (like 3.65, sub 700) and opening more spectrum (that
> is a mix of bound and non-bound) and see where that takes us. Time to
> wake up and go pickup the
No, we LOST. You see, once they have the power, they have the power.It is
not a victory to be partially regulated, or to get "partial exemption".
I cannot imagine why industry is rolling over and playing dead for this.
As far as I'm concerned it's "come and arrest me, coppers" and I w
Ehhh... Not that strange.
Several winters ago, we put in a small POP on the roof of a 2.5 story house in
the mountains. You can stand on the roof and see, 17 miles away, the other
end of the point, and with binoculars, see the house and all in the middle of
wheat fields. This link runs be
s is about?
They'll call it the "obama-air bill".
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:35 AM, MDK wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/19/us/19wiretap.html?_r=1
Quote:
An Obama administration task force that includes officials from the Justice
and Commerce Departments, the F.B.I.an
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/19/us/19wiretap.html?_r=1
Quote:
An Obama administration task force that includes officials from the Justice and
Commerce Departments, the F.B.I.and other agencies recently began working on
draft legislation to strengthen and expand the Communications Assistance t
This morning my favorite news site had yet another article about the FCC,
labled "walking a fine line" where they're distancing themselves a bit from
full on telecom style regulation and trying to sell some vague "in between"
approach.
To be honest, the electorate isn't in favor of ISP regula
Nothing will happen until the database is created. At that point, some
software tool will search it for you, and once some equipment is built, it
should auto-register for you, as well as control the channels.
For the moment, there's nothing any of us can do. You can't stake out a
claim, as
r 25, 2010 8:29 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Today is a Momentous Day for our Industry - Sept. 23rd,
2010
Well since I'm Yakima you now have my attention!
Forbes Mercy
President - Washington Broadband, Inc.
On 9/25/2010 5:00 PM, MDK wrote:
Your sarcasm would be, w
Oh... I thought it was just me having issues with the site. If you move
REAL slow, it seems to work fine.
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
--
From: "Jeromi
Your sarcasm would be, well, effective, if I weren't correct about there being
no way to use it. No other WISP is going to be able to do what I can't do,
either, Jack.
In my town, there is ONE UHF channel. 6 mhz. That's it. In the mountains,
where we need it due to forest, it can't be
I'm not trying to throw cold water on you, but before anyone gets themselves
all excited, they better make use of the spectrumbridge tool and see if they
have ANY available channels.I'm relatively rural and I have ONLY 2-9. All
other frequencies are either adjacent to in use or in use. An
a.org] On
>> Behalf Of Mike Hammett
>> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 7:59 AM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] testing... What happened?
>>
>>There was a post 1.5 hours before this one.
>>
>>
No wispa traffic in days.
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscrib
I find it disturbing that almost no public discussion of this is going on. Is
this a matter where we think that the imposition will have little or no effect
on us, or do we expect to simply ignore it, or is everyone just confident it
won't happen?
There's a lot going on, on many fronts, ec
How, uhh.. .do they propose to ban doing this?
>
> Note how the proposed rules essentially outlaw the competitive
> provision of non-POTS telecommunications service (anything but plain
> Internet access). They suggest that a large ISP is allowed to offer
> some small percentage of their net
10 1:21 PM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality statement from Genakowski
> At 9/2/2010 03:20 PM, MDK wrote:
>>Yesterday, the Chairman released a statement on net neutrality, which
>>basically said "We need more public comment".
>
>
Yesterday, the Chairman released a statement on net neutrality, which
basically said "We need more public comment".
This an excerpt from his published statement:
"Recent events have highlighted questions on how open Internet rules should
apply to 'specialized' services and to mobile broadband -
I'll second that.Mac, and all the other people who so selflessly put in
money and time and pain and sleepless hours and living without showers for days
to camping in crowded trailers and trying to get a cell signal and get
communication out to get stuff in, for countless hours that'll never
] Suggestions for high bandwidth @ 25 miles.
>
> On 8/31/2010 11:44 AM, MDK wrote:
>> Even when the radio rates stay up, throughput falls.
>
>
> Haven't seen that. There are some issues as such due to alignment,
> firmware and Ack settings... that affect all links, me
-4589
++
From: Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 8:15 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Suggestions for high bandwidth @ 25 miles.
I have NSM5 that do 150 megs aggregate right now.
On Aug 30, 2010 11:09 PM, "MDK" wrote:
I've alrea
Send me an email offlist at mark (at) neofast dot net and I'll design the whole
system for you, including what kind of reliability, etc, for your locality.
I'll even find you good prices and the right kind of parts to make it work
well.
I know the best places to buy pretty much everything.
, 2010 4:22 PM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Suggestions for high bandwidth @ 25 miles.
> Proxim, Ubiquiti M...
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
>
>
Assuming that spectrum (frequencies open) is not a problem, what would you
use in the 5 ghz range to reach 25 miles?Want to do full duplex 100 M
ethernet connection.
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
The H/V patterns DO NOT PERFECTLY OVERLAP.Duhhh.
Had some strange RSSI anomalies I could not understand until I moved the
antenna. Actually pointing it farther away resulted in better RSSI.
There seem to be some mild nulls at or rather near the edges of the beams,
where the V and H will h
I won't claim any great expertise here, but I have seen the same from RM.
There is some minor thing wrong with the way Fresnel is calculated that
seems to cause this.
If you leave the link right as it is, but change the overall size of your
map, you may find that the odd up and down rssi calcul
Make the message simple and easy to understand.
END IT!
Might even sell.
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
From: Rick Harnish
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 4:04 PM
To: memb...@wispa.org ; 'WISPA
YOu have it all wrong.
Suppose you live in a land where your culture is incapable of dealing with
the rest of the world around it, but the "invaders" are bleeding hearts who
"give" you land and let you try to "continue" your incompatible culture
unchanged in a world where it is outdated, outmod
;t compete in
the real world. They won't allow us to bring them technology that would help
all their people. Instead they just built a huge new Tribal headquarters and
are trying to get money to build a huge gambling casino.
Travis
Microserv
MDK wrote:
I tried to, but it f
I tried to, but it fell through.They chose to spend a HUGE amount of money
for Fiber to the curb and try to administer it themselves, rather than about
15% of the cost for me to bring in broadband and maintain it. As far as I
know, it has been a disaster, but they're now so invested in it
I've had several UBNT devices lose output power suddenly. Then one side
of the link is about 18-20 db lower than the other, and the throughput goes
away, badly.
Do you have a large RXSL differences between sides on any link?
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
I've got a number of links and customers and whatnot, in the LONG category,
many past 20 miles.lots of backhauls over 10 miles.
So far, haven't seen anything I recognize as something unusual.
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
+
Want your internet to move faster, pay me more money.I tell my customers
that.
Wow, what a criminal I am. Destroying the internet.
Sheesh.Can we get past the noise and on to what an immense opportunity
this would be for private enterprise to thrash Verizon?
If Qwest, Charter would ju
Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:01 PM, MDK wrote:
>> This is about business. Don't insult us by posting "Huffington" as
>> anything but trash.
>>
>> There's no detail in the story whatsoever, to judge th
This is about business. Don't insult us by posting "Huffington" as
anything but trash.
There's no detail in the story whatsoever, to judge the merits of the
"conclusions" of the writer, so I assume it's pure trash, like everything
else on Huffington.
++
Neofast,
Fred, a guy on the UBNT site was offering some RF shields for the UBNT
sectors. Those, combined with spacing and screening and grounding,
appeared to bring the RXSL down low enough to actually put the same
frequencies on the same tower.Or, if it were a building or water tank,
But, Airmax
That came to the attention of the list several months ago.What's come
out since then, is that the IRS itself hasn't the capacity to even deal with
the 1099's, nor have they the automated capacity to do what Congress
intended they use them for. Nor has Congress provided the means of
fund
Do you mean by "bandwidth", the number of bytes moved, or the maximum velocity
at which they can move?In the question below, that is.
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
From: Jack Unger
Sent: Tues
I have limited sympathy with your comments for a simple reason...Health
Care IS NOW a political topic.So is broadband. So is internet network
operations. So is bandwidth control, so is hiring someone, so is firing
someone, so are the money management choices you make, so is retirement
On the political side of the issue, the anti-Genakowski allies are increasing
in number and strength.
http://biggovernment.com/smotley/2010/08/03/another-week-of-growing-opposition-to-fccs-internet-grab/#more-152353
I, for one, think that if Comcast Charter or Qwest, or anyone, started
depr
How can this be good?IT IS A PER-CUSTOMER TAX ON OUR SERVICE AND GAURANTEED
TO NEVER HELP SMALL PROVIDERS.
Cripes, this is good?
There's ONE good plan.
USF go byebye.
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
Great, they want to tax us now.
Nothing like getting kicked in the head.Tax the little guy to subsidize the
big one.What a wonderful plan.
This is worse than NOTHING.
+
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
+++
Let's see... the Administration continues to implement wildly absurd and
destructive policies, continues a mad dash desperate attempt to bankrupt the
country with spending so insane it boggles the mind, continues to take over
industries with regulatory legislation that makes less sense than chew
downfall. Most WISP's are built on independance. We should fight
> against the use of our tax dollars for all these wasteful programs. I
> think all other utilities should be made to stand on their own as
> well. What better way to show that it works than by our own example?
>
>
If you did, how would you sleep at night, knowing you're ripping off money
for nuttin?
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
--
From: "Glenn Kelley"
Sent: Monday
Xg's product is stated to allow small operators to offer a "cellular" like
service, using the 900 spectrum.They say they can deal with crowded
spectrum, and it's designed for low density population.
What it amounts to is an IP mobile network, using portable VOIP phones.
It is interesting,
Patrick, could you de-jargonize what 'second order diversity' means?
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
--
From: "Patrick Leary"
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 20
I put up a temporary install of a UBNT rocket / sector combination, and it's
at one of my regular AP spots, it sees quite a bit of noise.
using a nanobridge as a cpe, and with only one other client online... I
was able, at 4 miles, to get an internal speed test of 120mbit.This is
using 4
I've never been to any WISP or ISP "con" of any kind. Wanted to, but never
had the dough to go.
First, St Louis? Why? Go to Las Vegas and do it in early November.
There's a cheap way to get to Vegas from anywhere in the US, especially at
that time of the year.
Heck, round trip from the
Anyone with 2 cents worth of common sense could have told them the outcome.
The reason most poor are poor in developed nations is because of the poor
quality of decisions.Children of families that exhibit this behavior
merely continue it.Give them the additional means of wasting more tim
This may be our last chance to survive in this business.
I know what my position is, and it should be clear to most of you.
However, the FCC needs to hear from the smaller operators, and from small
business saying "Hands off!" "We can't afford your wishes." And they
need to hear it from the
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking to Sell..
> Are you talking 5Ghz?
>
> On 6/15/10, MDK wrote:
>> I'm real happy with the 23 db panels from Arc Wireless. Slightly better
>> RSSI than a 25 db PacW grid.
>&
1 - 100 of 253 matches
Mail list logo
