Hi All,
I have to upgrade a couple of backhaul systems and I'm wondering what others
are using.
I've got Airaya gear in place. I've LOVED it. That's been some of the most
reliable gear that I've ever used.
I also like my Mikrotik hardware so far. We've put quite a bit of it in
over the las
t;
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Randy Cosby
> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 11:18 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>
> Do you have to go through s
WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
Can you point us to your fcc certified 5.4 systems?
Randy
Dennis Burgess wrote:
> A MT distributor has to go though the entire process to build and sell
a
> FCC certified System,..
>
> -
With current implementation MT can not be DFS/TPC certified since it does meet
the FCC requirements.
/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Randy Cosby
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:18:03
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
Do you have
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 11:19 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] backhaul choices
Hi All,
I have to upgrade a couple of backhaul systems and I'm
http://www.linktechs.net
LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training
Author of "Learn RouterOS"
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of ralph
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 10:57 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backh
http://www.linktechs.net
LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training
Author of "Learn RouterOS"
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Randy Cosby
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 11:14 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ba
ginal Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of ralph
> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 10:57 AM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>
> Marlon-
> You asked, and you probably already kno
Does this mean we can use 5.4Ghz with MT?
-Cameron
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Dennis Burgess
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 12:21 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
A MT distributor
uot;
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Randy Cosby
> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 11:14 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>
> Anyone you know of worki
14, 2009 11:18 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
Do you have to go through separate certification for the 5.4 DFS / TPC,
or just based on the existing certification of the card?
Randy
Dennis Burgess wrote:
> We have do
l List
>Subject: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>
>Hi All,
>
>I have to upgrade a couple of backhaul systems and I'm wondering what
>others
>are using.
>
>I've got Airaya gear in place. I've LOVED it. That's been some of the
>most
>reliable gear that I&
rks
>Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 11:08 AM
>To: 'WISPA General List'
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>
>I like the Radwin 2000 links (especially because of their price) for
>unlicensed... although Orthogon still has a warm spot in my heart
>(although
>they ar
-Mobile
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Randy Cosby
>
> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:18:03
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>
>
> Do you have to go through separate certification for the 5.4 DFS / TPC,
> or just based on the
I will second the Radwin. Its a good chooce for the price
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: "3-dB Networks"
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:07:51
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
I like the Radwin 2000 links
lakel...@gbcx.net wrote:
> I will second the Radwin. Its a good chooce for the price
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "3-dB Networks"
>
> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:07:51
> To: 'WISPA General List'
>
BlackBerry
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: "3-dB Networks"
> >
> > Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:07:51
> > To: 'WISPA General List'
> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
> >
> >
> > I like the Radwin 2000 links
Of Randy Cosby
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 11:38 AM
To: e...@wisp-router.com; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
That's what I thought. Anyone know anything different?
Jeffscosoho's site is lacking in detail.
e...@wisp-router.com wrote:
> With current impl
sage -
From: "Dennis Burgess"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
> There is DFS2 information in there. You would need to verify that the N
> card is certified in the
, September 14, 2009 8:40 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
To be fair, in backhaul list
We should include.
Trango Tlink45 - 45mbps $2000
Bridgewave LTE60 - 60Ghz 100mb FDX - $8000 street (not sure MSR)
As well... From my understanding SnapLink is priced per
DeReggi
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 8:40 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
To be fair, in backhaul list
We should include.
Trango Tlink45 - 45mbps $2000
Bridgewave LTE60 - 60Ghz 100mb FDX - $8000 street (not sure MSR)
As well... From my understanding
Website: http://www.linktechs.net
LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training
Author of "Learn RouterOS"
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of ralph
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 10:57 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sub
a.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of ralph
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 9:00 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
Pretty broad statement: "MT is FCC Certified :)"
Yes, I believe the wireless cards themselves might be- but even if they
t; Thanks
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Dennis Burgess
> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 12:00 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>
> MT is FCC Certified :)
, September 14, 2009 9:04 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
As a MT Distributor, MT contacts us from time to time to have their
systems FCC tested with various different antennas. I for one know that
we have shipped ARC Wireless 2.4 19dB and ARC 2.4 15dB and ARC 5GHz 23dB
rity or certify a 19dB panel and
substitute for a 19dB grid dish.
/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: "ralph"
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:00:20
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
Pretty broad statement: "
On
Behalf Of ralph
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 8:00 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
Pretty broad statement: "MT is FCC Certified :)"
Yes, I believe the wireless cards themselves might be- but even if they
are,
that does not an FCC certifi
Dennis Burgess
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 9:28 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
That's the only way you can get it. It must be built by a MT
distributor, along with the FCC stickers put on it etc and sold as a
completed FCC Certified System. Can'
rgess
> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 12:00 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>
> MT is FCC Certified :)
>
> ---
> Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
> WIS
l.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:53 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
Excuse my ignorance but since the card is the only thing that
transmits why does the board and especially why does the enclosure
need to be certified? If one puts a two way radio in
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jerry Richardson
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 6:12 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
That's been the ongoing argument.
I use the analogy of a PCMCIA or USB card. that's the
; From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
>> On
>> Behalf Of Dennis Burgess
>> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 12:00 PM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>>
>> MT is FCC Certified :)
>&
a.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Dennis Burgess
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 4:32 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
The way I understand it, the routerboard don't matter, the antenna, and
radio matters, as its certified as a system, with xx ga
: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
MT is FCC Certified :)
---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendo
Behalf Of os10ru...@gmail.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:53 PM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>>
>> Excuse my ignorance but since the card is the only thing that
>> transmits why does the board and especially w
Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Brian Webster
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 8:17 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
I think the point about certification was specifically asked regarding the
5.4 version and having been approve
, September 16, 2009 5:18 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
I think the point about certification was specifically asked regarding the 5.4
version and having been approved for DFS.
Thank You,
Brian Webster
Jerry Richardson wrote:
That's been the ongoing argument.
terboard) just runs it.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of os10ru...@gmail.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:53 PM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISP
PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
The way I understand it, the routerboard don't matter, the antenna, and
radio matters, as its certified as a system, with xx gain of this type
of antenna. You also have to have the FCC information, etc, on the
outside that MT o
o: "'WISPA General List'"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
> Don't forget that routerboard is a computer. It does more than enable the
> wireless card.
> It needs to have a Part 15 computing device certification as well, just
> like
> your PC.
>
> So
ads
> does, however.
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> --
> From: "ralph"
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:22 PM
> To: "&#
The new RB411R do have a onboard wireless interface.
/ Eje
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:27 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
An
;WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
The new RB411R do have a onboard wireless interface.
/ Eje
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:27 PM
To: WI
lation and fines as well).
/ Eje
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Randy Cosby
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:31 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
What does the FCC symbol stamped on
does not have onboard wireless at all, only a mPCI. A crossroads
> does, however.
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> --
> From: "ralph"
>
.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 1:27 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
An RB411 does not have onboard wireless at all, only a mPCI. A
09 12:22 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
Don't forget that routerboard is a computer. It does more than enable the
wireless card.
It needs to have a Part 15 computing device certification as well, just like
your PC.
So regardless of the radio card
WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
Are you sure?
When I looked at the internal photos of what they had tested, on the FCC
site, it looked like there was a pigtail from an N connector plugged onto
the mother board.
I saw a mini-pci connector too, but it appeared to be emp
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 1:13 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
I don't see anything like that on the pdf you referred to.
I have in my hand a 433AH in a case that came from a well known supplier of
pre-cased RBs
There are no markings on
:27 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
An RB411 does not have onboard wireless at all, only a mPCI. A crossroads
does, however.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From
just which equipment was
> and was not. Some folks would care I think.
> Of course from what I have read and seen over the years, many of you do not
> care whether or not you are operating legally.
>
> I'm not trying to start anything- just stating the facts as I see 'em.
sday, September 16, 2009 2:23 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
Time to stop this thread since your just spreading FUD.. Read my other
posts.
All MikroTik products do have the appropriate FCC certification and/or
testing done on them.
/ Eje
-O
-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Randy Cosby
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 4:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
The FCC logo on the RB433AH is right next to the "CE" logo just to the
left of the two (ram?) chips a
the board in a 433AH board marked as such or do they all say 433?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Randy Cosby
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 4:22 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: R
me
to do the same
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
http://www.3dbnetworks.com
>-Original Message-
>From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>Behalf Of ralph
>Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 2:27 PM
>To: 'WISPA General List'
>Subj
4:27 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
Sorry Eje- No need for personal criticism. If you don't like the discussion,
then press delete- but don't try to silence me.
What I would like to see happen is for MT to show us the testing. They
should
un...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-
>> boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of Randy Cosby
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 4:22 PM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>>
>> The FCC logo on the RB433AH is right next to the &qu
g] On Behalf
Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 4:48 PM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
Don't confuse the FCC aproval of the routerboard emmisions as a CPU
with the actual FCC certification of a rf system with radio pig
.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Chuck Hogg
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 4:47 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
The test results are available on the FCC website.
Regards,
Chuck Hogg
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 13:22 -0400, ralph wrote:
> As far as I can tell from the FCC info, only 2 routerboards have any FCC
> Part 15 Class A or B computing device approval.
> They are the Crossroads and the RB411- both of which already have on board
> wireless.
You are half correct. The Crossroa
client setup.
thanks,
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Butch Evans"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
> On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 13:22 -0400, ralph wrote:
>> As far as I can tell f
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 14:47 -0600, 3-dB Networks wrote:
> I really haven't followed this thread that closely... but with this much
> confusion... Mikrotik should probably explain how and why they are FCC
> legal. Most manufacturers put at the end of their user manuals a detailed
> explanation of
st
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>
>On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 14:47 -0600, 3-dB Networks wrote:
>> I really haven't followed this thread that closely... but with this
>much
>> confusion... Mikrotik should probably explain how and why they are FCC
>> legal. Most ma
ew gear. Or something too cheap
> like an 802.11a ap and client setup.
>
> thanks,
> marlon
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Butch Evans"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 3:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhau
I don't want any unproven brand new gear. Or something
> too cheap
> like an 802.11a ap and client setup.
>
> thanks,
> marlon
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Butch Evans"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Wednesday, September
at people are
>> using and
>> liking. I don't want any unproven brand new gear. Or something
>> too cheap
>> like an 802.11a ap and client setup.
>>
>> thanks,
>> marlon
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Butch
ogg
Shelby Broadband
502-722-9292
ch...@shelbybb.com
http://www.shelbybb.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of ralph
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 5:12 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backha
ptember 16, 2009 6:57 PM
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>
> Uh, guys, this is interesting. But it doesn't answer the original
question!
>
> I don't have a need for a 100meg full duplex backhaul solution. 20 megs
>
gt; an external trango Atlas link coming down in about a week I can part with
> ;)
>
> Scott Carullo
> Brevard Wireless
> 321-205-1100 x102
>
> -------- Original Message
>> From: "Marlon K. Schafer"
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 6:57 PM
>> To
Original Message
From: "Marlon K. Schafer"
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 6:57 PM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
Uh, guys, this is interesting. But it doesn't answer the original
WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
Assuming you can get 40mhz of 5ghz spectrum and not need it anymore,
MT is great and it's cheap. Finding that 40mhz is your major concern.
I am running two backhauls, each with two pairs of radios (that's
40mhz of spectrum) and they
t; From: "Butch Evans"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 3:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>
>
> > On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 13:22 -0400, ralph wrote:
> >> As far as I can tell from the FCC info, only 2 routerboa
Believe this is in the documentation MT provides.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 6:01 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
On Wed, 2009-09-16
lon K. Schafer
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 5:58 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
Uh, guys, this is interesting. But it doesn't answer the original
question!
I don't have a need for a 100meg full duplex backhaul solution. 20 megs
both ways will d
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Chuck Hogg
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 6:15 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
As I linked to previously, there is a search feature on the FCC site. It lists
20+ certifications for RouterBoard product, as I
-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 6:39 PM
To: sc...@brevardwireless.com; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
Assuming you can get 40mhz of 5ghz spectrum and not need it anymore,
MT is great and it's cheap. Finding that 40m
> To: sc...@brevardwireless.com; WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>
> Assuming you can get 40mhz of 5ghz spectrum and not need it anymore,
> MT is great and it's cheap. Finding that 40mhz is your major concern.
>
> I am running two backhauls, each with
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 5:12 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
So the three lock ups on my links while using dual nstreme were just a
g
> Author of "Learn RouterOS"
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Josh Luthman
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 5:12 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul
ehalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 10:26 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
I am suggesting don't use dual nstreme as it causes lock ups.
Use OSPF to create a pseudo FDX bridge between two links. Personally done
with 1 RB and 2 radios on each
although I never tried it for myself.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Josh Luthman
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 10:26 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul
ist
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>It tends to fall on its face at times although I never tried it for myself.
What is "it"? Referring to dual nstreme?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"When you have eliminated t
Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Josh Luthman
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:03 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
>
> >It tends to fall on its face at times a
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 11:23 -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:
> Have Butch set it up in a few minutes or read the documentation and get it
> going yourself. Well worth it.
http://blog.butchevans.com/2008/10/using-ospf-to-create-full-duplex-behaviour-for-wireless-links/
I believe it is still on my ot
Looks nice. Thanks Butch!
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:12 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 11:23 -0400, Josh
I can't use 3650 out here. We're in an exclusion zone.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Josh Luthman"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
> Marlon - looked into Redline an80i
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backhaul choices
I can't use 3650 out here. We're in an exclusion zone.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Josh Luthman"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] backha
87 matches
Mail list logo
