Martin Dietze schreef:
On 27 May 2015 at 15:27, Alexey I. Froloff ra...@raorn.name wrote:
It was actually imported from (already dead) KSI Linux distro,
last updated ten years ago. But still, this is better than
nothing.
Need to take a look, maybe there's stuff that I can improve.
Good
On May 27, 2015 5:55 AM, Martin Dietze mdie...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I understand the very idea behind SuSE's Open Build Service
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Build_Service) is to provide an
infrastructure to provide native packages for different distros. This
does not free
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:12:23AM +0200, Martin Dietze wrote:
I would take the latest Fedora WindowMaker src.rpm, replace
the tarball in it and rebuild it
OK, got it. The problem was that I have a GNUstep installation in
~/GNUstep and several environment variables pointing to it.
Better use
On 27 May 2015 at 11:44, Carlos R. Mafra crma...@gmail.com wrote:
This service can build packages for multiple distros and I always
had the impression that it could potentially unify the work
done by each distro, they would all just pick up the wmaker package
from that build system. So the
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:41:14AM +0200, Martin Dietze wrote:
Better use mock instead of just rpm-build.
mock? Never heard of that. I am rather unfamiliar with the RH family
of distributions and its tools...
It's a tool, to build rpm packages in chroot, so your environment
doesn't affect the
On 27 May 2015 at 10:03, Nerijus Baliunas neri...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I would take the latest Fedora WindowMaker src.rpm, replace the tarball in it
and rebuild it
OK, got it. The problem was that I have a GNUstep installation in
~/GNUstep and several environment variables pointing to
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:44:54AM +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
I think there are distro packagers in this mailing list. Can I ask
them if a unified wmaker package from build.opensuse.org is something
worth having?
There's no suck thing like unified package, sorry to disappoint
you. Some
On 27 May 2015 at 11:32, Alexey I. Froloff ra...@raorn.name wrote:
Better use mock instead of just rpm-build.
mock? Never heard of that. I am rather unfamiliar with the RH family
of distributions and its tools...
--
-- mdie...@gmail.com --/-- mar...@the-little-red-haired-girl.org
On Wed, 27 May 2015 at 9:57:07 +0200, Martin Dietze wrote:
Still being a diehard Debian user I have to use RHEL at work (gasp).
I have long searched for more or less up-to-date ready-made packages,
and I ended up with the repo on li.nux.ro. This is nice, but I've
always liked to play around
On Wed, 27 May 2015 at 13:59:08 +0300, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
It is possible to use one source package to build RPMs for
different distros (like Fedora, RHEL, SUSE, whatever), but due to
little differences in macros, specfile would look like spaghetti
of %ifdef's, each section maintained
On Wed, 27 May 2015 at 15:33:27 +0200, Martin Dietze wrote:
On 27 May 2015 at 15:27, Alexey I. Froloff ra...@raorn.name wrote:
It was actually imported from (already dead) KSI Linux distro,
last updated ten years ago. But still, this is better than
nothing.
Need to take a look, maybe
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:31:38PM +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
Could you consider to submit your work with the specfile to the
wmaker git repository? The idea being that other people could
add the %ifdef's needed for other distros too, and we would have
a central specfile for wmaker.
I
On 27 May 2015 at 12:59, Alexey I. Froloff ra...@raorn.name wrote:
There's no suck thing like unified package, sorry to disappoint
you.
It is possible to use one source package to build RPMs for
different distros (like Fedora, RHEL, SUSE, whatever), but due to
little differences in macros,
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 03:00:47PM +0200, Martin Dietze wrote:
I was happy to see that somebody has actually made them by now (I had
planned to do this myself for long, but for a non-native speaker this
kind of thing usually takes a bit longer of course).
It was actually imported from (already
On 27 May 2015 at 14:12, Alexey I. Froloff ra...@raorn.name wrote:
P.S. You can simplify this by importing Ukrainian translations
and converting manpages from iso8859-1 to utf-8.
Я тільки за :)
I was happy to see that somebody has actually made them by now (I had
planned to do this myself for
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 08:37:56AM -0400, Charles Philip Chan wrote:
There's no suck thing like unified package, sorry to disappoint
you.
OBS have been used successfully to build packages for many distros,
including:
I am aware what OBS is, thank you.
--
Regards,--
Sir Raorn. ---
On 27 May 2015 at 15:44, Carlos R. Mafra crma...@gmail.com wrote:
Can someone send this to the main git repo for greater visibility?
I've committed them, see appended. I haven't tried it out though.
Cheers,
Martin
--
-- mdie...@gmail.com --/-- mar...@the-little-red-haired-girl.org
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:28:45PM +0300, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
I've made a COPR repo and built wmaker-crm-next for EPEL-7,
F20, F21, F22 and Rawhide.
Totally forgot the URL. Here it is:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/raorn/wmaker-crm-next/
You can either use dnf copr plugin or
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:31:38PM +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
Could you consider to submit your work with the specfile to the
wmaker git repository? The idea being that other people could
add the %ifdef's needed for other distros too, and we would have
a central specfile for wmaker.
I've
On Wed, 27 May 2015 at 16:13:48 +0200, Martin Dietze wrote:
On 27 May 2015 at 15:44, Carlos R. Mafra crma...@gmail.com wrote:
Can someone send this to the main git repo for greater visibility?
I've committed them, see appended. I haven't tried it out though.
Thank you!
--
To unsubscribe,
On Wed, 27 May 2015 at 17:28:45 +0300, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:31:38PM +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
Could you consider to submit your work with the specfile to the
wmaker git repository? The idea being that other people could
add the %ifdef's needed for other
Actually, on OBS, if you want to avoid the %ifdef mess, when building for
openSUSE and Fedora, for instance, just use two specfiles. One would be
Package-openSUSE_13.2.spec and the other would be Package-Fedora_21.spec
On May 27, 2015 5:55 AM, Martin Dietze mdie...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 May
Still being a diehard Debian user I have to use RHEL at work (gasp).
I have long searched for more or less up-to-date ready-made packages,
and I ended up with the repo on li.nux.ro. This is nice, but I've
always liked to play around with the most recent features and benefit
from bugfixes (e.g.
23 matches
Mail list logo
