ion titles in the same ?! Or does it
> make more sense to have a seperate for each ??
The point you probably haven't considered is that it's a definition *list* -
a list of things and their definitions. So, one can have as many s
(and their attendant s) as you l
On 28/07/08 2:07 PM, "Matt Fellows" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, Grant, this is off topic for this list.
Is it? I thought XSLT was a web standard - it certainly has a home on the
W3C site ( http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt). Are we just a CSS group now?
--
Kevin Futter
Webma
eb developer', but my school
defines my role as 'IT Support'. (I'm also responsible for my share of IT
support and staff training too, so it doesn't even end there!)
Kevin
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
http://www.sbc.melb.catholic.edu.au/
###
rrect path with your original list.
>
> Find good conference papers if you can
No one¹s mentioned John Resig, developer of JQuery?
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
http://www.sbc.melb.catholic.edu.au/
##
On 11/5/07 10:23 AM, "Dan Dorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/10/07, Kevin Futter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Russ is indeed absolutely correct. These terms are confused all the time,
>> and while colloquial use might have become blurred in recent
s indeed absolutely correct. These terms are confused all the time,
and while colloquial use might have become blurred in recent years, their
technical definitions have not.
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
http://www.sbc.melb.catholic.edu.au/
###
at for most image
galleries - just a simple line of text above the gallery itself explaining
what you need to do. The images themselves or their captions are then left
alone to function as intended.
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, St. Bernard's C
t as a matter of course one global style sheet that I
usually call default.css¹, which sets up all the default styles (no
kidding?), and then a page- or section-specific style sheet to deal with
the, well, specifics (man, I think I see a pattern here...). I find that it
ma
On 3/3/06 10:24 AM, "Rob Mientjes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02/03/06, Kevin Futter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, it
> should be "*who* will grin gleefully" for a start.
My apologies for that
> typo, but it shouldn't detract from the ma
l, it should be "*who* will grin gleefully" for a start.
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
http://www.sbc.melb.catholic.edu.au/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgrou
On 23/2/06 10:19 PM, "Ian Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Futter wrote:
>
>> Anyway, for the benefit of others interested in this thread/topic, the
>> upshot from the above link seems to be that the pipe character (|) is the
>> best compromis
On 22/2/06 10:38 AM, "Patrick H. Lauke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Futter wrote:
>> My only concern about using a string
>> of text is defining a semantically-appropriate item delimiter that works
>> well for assistive technologies.
>
>
On 21/2/06 7:00 PM, "Patrick H. Lauke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Futter wrote:
>
>> Yes, I've argued strongly in the past that a list is not completely
>> semantically-appropriate for breadcrumbs markup. Unlike breadcrumbs, a flat
>> list do
ing your journey through my website, but a clear and
fixed path from site root to the page you're currently on. If you want to
traverse back and forth along your own personal path, you can use the ...
wait for it ... Back and Forwards buttons.
On 16/2/06 10:52 AM, "Lachlan Hunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Futter wrote:
>> On 15/2/06 6:57 PM, "Lachlan Hunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Many users hate popup windows. There are no valid use-cases or reasons
>>> for open
lesser of two evils, as the
other choice required changing the structural approach of the entire
website. An additional benefit of the pop-up not afforded by frames is that
the music player is still available even when the user chooses to leave
. I use this
resolution myself, as I don't like the slight aspect ratio distortions I get
using 1280x1024. (Skulks away realising none of this is on-topic ...)
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
http://www.sbc.melb.catholic.edu.au/
finition of the term, not
the CSS version.
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
http://www.sbc.melb.catholic.edu.au/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
mp
from word to word instead of tracking smoothly. I'd also have to dispute
that it looks "better", but that's just subjective on my part.
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
http://www.sbc.melb.catholic.edu.au/
ds,
> Rimantas
Ah, thanks Rimantas - last time I checked (a couple of weeks ago), the 0.7.6
version for Mac wasn't there, only the older 0.6.2 version (which definitely
doesn't work with FF1.5).
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
http://www.sbc.melb.cathol
n’t work under 1.5, which actually prevents me from upgrading on my work machine, as I use this all the time as a handy shortcut for picking up validation errors (and puts this thread vaguely on-topic too). The PC version works, so I’ll be upgrading my PC for sure.
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, S
oblem, while using the "readonly"
attribute and styling the input text a medium grey took care of the rest.
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
http://www.sbc.melb.catholic.edu.au/
**
The discussion list for http://we
your db is using for line breaks
(MySQL?).
Sorry to the list for straying off-topic, and apologies to Andreas (like the
new site mate!) if I'm barking up the wrong tree.
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
http://www.sbc.melb.catholic.edu.au/
**
g.com/boat/booksIndex.html
I *believe* it's
> legal... fingers crossed!
-Andrew.
�� ��.�Ȩ� b�� i��y�-jwZ�� ������I
> 瀆�i��y�-jwZ�� ������f���.�ץ�w����+�&xb���p)��b�-� ax b����)���
Well, having just read this:
http://157.26.64.29/OReilly_books/books/webprog/jscript/copyrg
nd around tables.
>
> So the use of tables appears to be associated strongly with invalid
> documents (and not only through poorly formed documents, but also
> through the use of invalid attributes associated with td and tr
> elements).
>
> In short, using tables is a very g
* be seeing the same
results in either version, OS-specific features aside (font rendering etc).
Having said all that, I'm not sure what's causing your error.
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
http://www.sbc.melb.catholic.edu.au/
*
nd correctly what you're trying to do, then yes, the images
will remain constrained at the width you set, with the browser automatically
adjusting the height to preserve the image's aspect ratio. Just leave the
height declaration out of your CSS and/or HTML. You'll get a f
a better font smoothing
> algorithm than FF and IE?
As far as I'm aware font smoothing is handled by the OS in OS X, and apps
are hands-off in this regard.
K
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
http://www.sbc.melb.catholic.edu.au/
On 24/5/05 4:43 PM, "Rick Faaberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/23/05 11:33 PM "Kevin Futter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent
> this out:
>
>> I can't speak for all browsers, but I do find it annoying that Firefox on
>> Windows has
e back off list) but: which
> browsers exactly?
I can't speak for all browsers, but I do find it annoying that Firefox on
Windows has the print preview option, but Firefox on the Mac does not
(latest versions). Makes it hard to recommend for verifying print output
(assuming it would be at
rors than any other browser on either platform (apologies to Linux users).
Camino has even more issues (naturally, at v0.8.4), but access to the Web
Developer toolbar for Firefox certainly makes up for any (real or imagined)
shortcomings for anyone hoping to use Web Standards.
(For the record, Fire
white-space: pre' would work?
>
> Iain
>
> --
> Iain Gardiner
> http://www.firelightning.com
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
http://www.sbc.melb.catholic.edu.au/
**
The discussion l
inux 4) Eclipse can do everything TSW
> Webcoder can do, everything I just mentioned (besides 1, but if I was
> smart enough I could just right and extention for that), and a whole lot
> more.
>
> Alan Trick
>
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
http://www.sbc.me
maybe?) not sure which
> browser 'get's it right' here, but the desired effect is the one in
> firefox.
IIRC, background-position declarations are supposed to apply to any element
that can take an image as a background, but IE/Win supports it only on the
body el
st arrived. I
think this is why when the list admins scream CLOSED on a thread, messages
for that thread can still arrive thereafter - we're not being rebellious,
just slow to catch up!
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
http:/
gly called IE7) that attempts to make IE6
behave in a more standards-compliant manner. See the link that Andreas
supplied for more details.
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
http://www.sbc.melb.catholic.edu.au/
***
say however that they were working towards integration and
uniformity of the two products, and I got the impression that meant
migrating Contribute's engine to Dreamweaver.
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
http://www.sbc.melb.catholic.edu.au/
***
nder
them invalid, so-to-speak. I'm sure someone else can explain it better than
I just did!
I've found this article quite useful, though it may not necessarily directly
address your problem:
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/article
the only
semantically valid approach. I too don't see any reason to change my views
on this, which renders further discussion/debate kinda pointless.
I respect your views on this issue Mordechai and you argue them well, and I
apologise if I've antagonised you in any way, but at the end of
On 6/12/04 4:04 PM, "Mordechai Peller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Futter wrote:
> "Less important" doesn't mean "not important."
Exactly, which is why I didn't say "not important" ...
>
>> And therein lies the ru
On 6/12/04 2:23 PM, "Mordechai Peller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Futter wrote:
>
>> Yes, breadcrumb elements are strongly related in exactly the same way that
>> sentence elements (i.e. words) are; and sentences can be rendered with
>> precis
On 6/12/04 11:09 AM, "Mordechai Peller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Futter wrote:
>
>> I don't buy the argument that breadcrumbs *have to be* structured as lists.
>> Why? Because they're not a collection of loosely-related list items, like a
>> work effectively. To take the 'breadcrumbs must be lists' argument to its
>> logical extreme would see us marking up sentences as ordered lists, with
>> individual words as list items, simply because each component has a
>> relationship to its neighbours. I don&#
the 'breadcrumbs must be lists' argument to its
logical extreme would see us marking up sentences as ordered lists, with
individual words as list items, simply because each component has a
relationship to its neighbours. I don't see any inherent semantic
superi
ng, Which is why CSS works together with XSLT to style XML. I don't know the history. Was CSS developed first for XSLT/XML and then applied to HTML? Or vice versa?
Best regards,
Marilyn Langfeld
http://www.langfeldesigns.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1.301.598.3300 business phone
+1.301.598.0
that the relevant parser
requires to render the expected output. In fact, my other commonly used
option is just to say 'HTML' - just about everybody understands roughly what
that is, conceptually at least.
Cheers,
Kevin
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
http://www.sbc.me
I interpreted 'IR' to stand for 'image replacement', such as FIR and sFIR et
al.
Cheers,
Kevin Futter
On 1/12/04 7:50 AM, "Terrence Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure what IR refers to. Here's the the CSS rule explained:
>
--
apostrophes! For the record,
plurals only require apostrophes if they are also possessive. I'm sure
you're phrasing is just misleading here - we can discuss it off list if
necessary.
Cheers,
Kevin
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
http://www.sbc.melb.catholi
window, and child tabs open in the same window will inherit
any status bar wrangling that is applied to that window. IMHO this is a
minor flaw in the way Firefox uses the status bar, as it should be relative
to the current tab, not the 'containing' window. Do any oth
Actually, it's been my experience that using transparent makes no difference
to the layout problems. For me, I've always had to define a border colour -
obviously the same as the background colour - in order for this 'hack' to
work.
Cheers,
Kevin Futter
On 1/11/04 10:55 A
While I agree with the idea of clarifying the destination, I disagree with
the logic of your choice here. The pronunciation issues with A are
significant enough to warrant B as the first choice.
Cheers,
Kevin
On 27/10/04 6:48 PM, "Mike Foskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Clarify the destinati
On 25/10/04 12:13 PM, "Patrick H. Lauke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Futter wrote:
>
>> Click here
>
> Small modification: use popWindow(this.href) to refer back to the A
> element's HREF attribute. This way, if you change the href at some
>
Hi Chris,
The semi-accessible way of creating JavaScript pop-ups would go something
like this:
Create a js function called popWindow() or somesuch, with all the relevant
code to create your pop-up window. Your HTML code would then look something
like this:
Click here
This essentially creates th
Here's a link to an article that convinced me the Websafe colour palette
sits alongside Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster ...
http://webmonkey.wired.com/webmonkey/00/37/index2a.html?tw=design
Cheers,
Kevin Futter
On 21/10/04 4:49 PM, "Neerav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
I interpreted this as a z-index issue too ... (but I didn't check the code).
Kevin
On 21/10/04 1:48 PM, "Stephen Cheshire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> What's the z-index of the block of text starting with "Maecenas laoreet
> laoreet..."
>
> is it greater than the submenus? Because I'm thinkin
I think for most clients you just don't go there - after all, it's their
site, not yours. They don't know or care about web standards, and neither do
their clients - it just doesn't mean anything to them, so is hardly useful
for evangelical purposes. Imagine if all TV commercials had a "SMPTE" bann
Hi Rick,
You're not tied to using the W3C images, and there are a few good
replacements around. I'm using a pretty common set of examples on the front
page of my site (http://www.klp.com.au/). They're not mine, and I've
forgotten exactly where I borrowed them from (so apologies to the original
cre
rom memory, it's the
option key for IE/Mac - maybe someone else here can clarify). In the past,
I've had to resort to deleting temporary Internet files, closing the
browser, restarting the machine and starting from scratch (on Windows). Even
then my mileage varied.
Good luck!
Kevin Futter
upport ANY syntax.
It's free, too.
Cheers,
Kevin Futter
On 12/10/04 1:05 AM, "Genau Junior" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anybody knows some software like that for Windows?
>
>
> Genau Lopes Júnior
> WebDesigner
>
>
> - Original Message -
&
On 11/10/04 10:11 AM, "Paul Connolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 11 Oct 2004, at 00:54, Kevin Futter wrote:
>
>> SubethaEdit is impressive, especially given that it's free, and it
>> comes
>> with a bunch of preset 'pretty print'
I use Dreamweaver MX2004 for site development and SubethaEdit for nuts and
bolts text editing. I know some people are leery of DW because they see it
as purely a WYSIWYG solution, but its code editing tools are robust and its
site management tools can't be matched by any text-editor. And it makes a
uar level, but not
beyond).
But you're right, it shouldn't even exist ...
Cheers,
Kevin Futter
On 8/10/04 1:07 AM, "Tom Livingston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Safari 1.0 has got to be a unbelievably microscopic audience, if it
> exists at all. That version shoul
io player that opens (on a
user-initiated click) in a small pop-up, allowing visitors to continue to
load and listen to her songs, even after moving off to another site.
Cheers,
Kevin Futter
On 6/10/04 2:16 PM, "John Horner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Almost too obvious to
Title: Re: [WSG] Semantically creating 'pipes' for footer links
For the line wrapping issue, you could try:
whitespace: nowrap;
On whatever element is giving you trouble.
Cheers,
Kevin Futter
On 5/10/04 11:28 AM, "Richard Czeiger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi gu
Actually, I apply classes and styles to hrefs all the time - it's the only
way to emulate button functionality on a text link.
Cheers,
Kevin
On 1/10/04 9:23 AM, "David McKinnon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My very sincerest apologies, John.
> I made one small change to the HTML before I started
up either ...
Cheers,
Kevin Futter
On 30/9/04 8:48 AM, "Wayne Godfrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could someone please explain what I can and can't do with a PNG image in IE
> Windows? I have a logo with a soft drop shadow that works everywhere except
> IE Win. I
The 'fixed' property for element background images works in IE only for the
body selector, and fails in all other cases.
Cheers,
Kevin
On 28/9/04 7:27 PM, "john" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ladies and Gentlemen:
>
> I'm attempting my first fixed background, and I have one question and
> need o
Hi James,
I get it too on IE 5.2, but only for the password field, not the username
field. The only difference I can see between the 2 fields is the 'value=""'
attribute, so maybe try adding that to the password field and see if it
makes any difference.
Kevin
On 28/9/04 1:17 PM, "James Ellis" <[
on an elephant to make it
easier to carry across a swollen river ...
Cheers,
Kevin Futter
On 24/9/04 8:53 AM, "David McKinnon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reiterating Ben's comments and Zeldman's summary of the problems with the
> Satay method in Designing With We
Well, that's twice today already that I've spoken too soon! This extension
pops the interface up as expected but doesn't actually show anything in the
Errors and Warnings window, so I'd say it doesn't work on Mac OS after all
...
Cheers,
Kevin (red-faced)
On 21/9/0
Actually, I've just found, downloaded/installed and tested it, and it's
running fine on Mac OS X (10.3.5).
Cheers,
Kevin Futter
On 21/9/04 11:59 AM, "Patrick H. Lauke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Futter wrote:
>> Is it OS or version sp
Hi James,
I can't find this anywhere on the Extensions site - can you point to it
specifically? Is it OS or version specific?
Cheers,
Kevin
On 21/9/04 11:10 AM, "James Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Just a heads up for all of you trying to move to standards compliant,
> accessi
Ted - the content between the iframe tags doesn't need to be hidden or
commented out; in browsers that support iframes, it's automatically replaced
by the content specified in the source attribute, otherwise it's shown.
Think of it a little bit like the noframes or noscript tags in old school
HTML,
l browsers.
Cheers,
Kevin Futter
On 21/9/04 10:04 AM, "Ted Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are using a popup calendar for forms on our site and it uses an iframe for
> the calendar.
> I'm getting this message from the developers toolbar 508 checker
>
> Rul
It appears from another post that I am wrong! Oh well ...
Kevin Futter
On 21/9/04 8:56 AM, "Kevin Futter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My understanding was that there shouldn't be a comma in the shorthand font
> selector after "Trebuchet MS" (but I coul
My understanding was that there shouldn't be a comma in the shorthand font
selector after "Trebuchet MS" (but I could be wrong ...).
Cheers,
Kevin Futter
On 20/9/04 4:26 PM, "John Oxton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe you could try not using the font shor
76 matches
Mail list logo
