I'm still using Dreamweaver mainly. Textmate (http://macromates.com/) for
anything else, especially if I don't want to wait for Dw to open.
I have coda as well (http://www.panic.com/coda/), but it is damn slow on my
old mac, I don't know how it is on newer G5/Intel machines. If it wasn't
that slow
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gicela Morales
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 2:51 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] CSS editors
Hi Everyone,
I've just migrated form PC to a new macbook :-) but was wondering about
the best xhtml/css editors
Don't know about 'best' but I use Dreamweaver.
Rob
2008/10/20 Gicela Morales [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Everyone,
I've just migrated form PC to a new macbook :-) but was wondering about
the best xhtml/css editors for macs around that people can recommend?
I can see that BBEdit is still around (
Gicela,
yes - CSS Edit is fantastic :) you'll love it :-)
My other favourite is Coda - http://www.panic.com/coda/
you might also like to try Smultron which is open source:
http://tuppis.com/smultron/
happy coding ;)
Prisca
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Gicela Morales
[EMAIL
Prisca--
Like Gicela, I too am new to Macs. I'm using Smultron and like it a
great deal. How does it compare with CSS Edit and Coda?
.greg
These are the days of miracle and wonder.
On Mon 20/10/08 03:00 , Prisca schmarsow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
Gicela,
yes - CSS Edit is fantastic :)
Prisca,
I have a graphic designer that swears by CSS Edit for all of his CSS
modifications.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Gregory Alan Gross
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Prisca--
Like Gicela, I too am new to Macs. I'm using Smultron and like it a great
deal. How does it compare with CSS
Hello list,
I am currently investigating the disparities between various screen
fonts and trying to come up with good font stacks that I can use in
Blueprint CSS [1]. I found this page:
http://www.w3schools.com/CSS/pr_font_font-size-adjust.asp
which explains how Verdana and Times, for example,
Greg,
how do they compare... that really depends on what you need your code editor
to do ;)
You've got to give Smultron credit for being such a good editor, syntax
highlighting etc - and being open source. So as an editor - if this is all
you need - it's perfect.
If, like me, you work a
Nick,
yes, CSS Edit is fantastic ;) for my students, entirely new to webdesign as
well as coding (I am teaching webdesign, the web standard's way - and full
on handcoding) - CSS Edit is proving a great help :)
The fact that we can go and not only take a closer look at any given site's
CSS - but
On Oct 20, 2008, at 3:42 AM, Gicela Morales wrote:
Thanks everyone. I like the idea of TextMate and TextWrangler!
Gicela :-)
2008/10/20 James Jeffery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have both BBEdit and TextMate.
I use TextMate alot because it's a nice and simple text editor.
Project creation is
Quoting tee [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Oct 20, 2008, at 3:42 AM, Gicela Morales wrote:
Thanks everyone. I like the idea of TextMate and TextWrangler!
Gicela :-)
2008/10/20 James Jeffery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have both BBEdit and TextMate.
I use TextMate alot because it's a nice and simple text
Just to throw this in the mix - stop trying to control the font size!
I dont require reading glasses (yet...), but due to weak eyesight for small
fonts and high-resolution screens causing poor font scaling, I choose to
increase the size of the default values for some fonts eg: I setup fonts to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want to save money and have an all round free open source editor
that does CSS, PHP, javascript, and other major languages I would
suggest notepad++.
Ignoring the fact that the OP requested a Mac -- not Windows-only --
solution :-)
So I'll mention jEdit
I use Aptana for all of my web development (XHTML/CSS/Rails/PHP). It was
just purchased by another company, but they do offer a community version for
free (Pro version for $99). (Link: http://www.aptana.com/studio/). They do
have a Mac version, although I've never used it, I'm a PC guy, but it's
I am sure most experienced Web authors know this, but some newer ones might
not. A quick and handy way to incrementally zoom and/or change text size when
viewing a web page is via keyboard shortcuts (Windows O/S):
Here is an expanded and updated compilation for zooming and/or changing text
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure most experienced Web authors know this, but some newer ones might
not. A quick and handy way to incrementally zoom and/or change text size when
viewing a web page is via keyboard shortcuts (Windows O/S):
Could someone
I use HTML-Kit which is free Web page Editing/Authoring facility that provides
the following features:
* Multiple File type editing: .html, .xml, .css, .rdf, .php, .js etc.
* Can be used for hand coding ala MS Notepad
* Pre-formed constructs, elements attributes can be used via drop-down
Christian Montoya wrote:
Could someone please read the body of my email instead of just
looking at the title and then post a response that is on-topic?
OK :-)
CSS2's 'font-size-adjust' support is limited to Gecko/Fx IIRC, and is
probably put on hold by the W3C CSS group for the time being -
Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure most experienced Web authors know this, but some newer ones might
not. A quick and handy way to incrementally zoom and/or change text size
when viewing a web page is via
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:36:26 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote:
- What's the support across browsers / machines for the font-size-adjust
property?
- Is adjusting the aspect value bad form? Is this as bad as letter-spacing
body copy?
Would this kill sheep?
- Has anyone done this before? Is
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:41 PM, David Hucklesby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:36:26 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote:
- What's the support across browsers / machines for the font-size-adjust
property?
- Is adjusting the aspect value bad form? Is this as bad as letter-spacing
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure most experienced Web authors know this, but some newer ones might
not. A quick and handy way to incrementally zoom and/or change text size when
viewing a web page is via keyboard shortcuts (Windows O/S):
Could someone
Christian Montoya wrote:
Could someone please read the body of my email instead of just
looking at the title and then post a response that is on-topic?
OK :-)
CSS2's 'font-size-adjust' support is limited to Gecko/Fx IIRC, and is
probably put on hold by the W3C CSS group for the time being -
Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure most experienced Web authors know this, but some newer ones might
not. A quick and handy way to incrementally zoom and/or change text size
when viewing a web page is via
I use HTML-Kit which is free Web page Editing/Authoring facility that provides
the following features:
* Multiple File type editing: .html, .xml, .css, .rdf, .php, .js etc.
* Can be used for hand coding ala MS Notepad
* Pre-formed constructs, elements attributes can be used via drop-down
Hi anyone can help me out with validating my css?...
I cant pass validation because of some css hacks i used. Is there a way to
hide those hacks when i validate it?
--
Fuji kusaka
***
List Guidelines:
Hi Fuji - Not sure what type of hacks you have used in, presumably thinking
some of these types
like _ and * for IE versions.
Those _ * will show errors when you validate, better option to use
conditional comments
Sundar
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Fuji kusaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would say plug your code directly into the W3C CSS validator
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/#validate_by_input
and delete the hacks.
However i have used hacks before and found that they did still pass through the
validator.
Could there be errors in your hacks.
Also, just as a note,
Ive use
#min-height:300px !important;
*html #mainContent{
behavior: url(iepngfix.htc) !important;
but cant get those validation..
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:06 AM, sundar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Fuji - Not sure what type of hacks you have used in, presumably thinking
some of
hi,
not sure what's going on in your CSS exactly.
but behavior is non-standard, it's a microsoft thing. with that png fix
I don't think you'll ever get it to validate but I could be wrong.
what's the hash (#) in front of min-height, is min-height an id? and
which element or selector is it
Fuji kusaka wrote:
#min-height:300px !important;
This should be:
SomeSelector {min-height:300px !important;}
What SomeSelector is, some selector.
*html #mainContent{
You need a space between * and html
behavior: url(iepngfix.htc) !important;
This will never validated because it's IE only.
I'm assuming most of the hacks are for IE? Why not just conditionally
include them, i.e. unless the validator obeys IE policies, it won't even
see the IE-specifi CSS.
Dave
Fuji kusaka wrote:
Hi anyone can help me out with validating my css?...
I cant pass validation because of some css
Hmm - we're currently debating what to do about dynamic css on our
project (Ruby on Rails based)
There seem to be a few options:
- No dynamic css at all
- Simple templated stuff, where the code is basically css + inline ruby:
#whatever { background-color : %= background_colour %; }
- Something
Korny Sietsma wrote:
I'd be interested in the thoughts of folks here. A simple template
would have the advantage of (possibly) working well in css editors and
tools; but there also seems to be some buzz around tools like Sass
that take some more repetition out of the CSS.
Is SASS a standard?
this is exactly why we use serverside scripts along with a config file
to define some base declarations such as colors.
then we can change the color in one place only, using the below example
#results .fn { font-size: 0.86em; color #739EA8; }
#results .tel { font-size: 0.86em; color #33; }
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adam Martin
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 10:13 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] :: CSS Code Formatting ::
We use a very similar approach - php to deliver the css.
This allows us
On Tue, 6 May 2008 19:19:24 +0530, Amrinder wrote:
I was reading this article on Smashing Magazine which shows how to increase
code
readability,
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/05/02/improving-code-readability-with-css-
styleguides/
but I have listened to Andy Clarke over Lynda.com
Hi,
I was reading this article on Smashing Magazine which shows how to increase
code readability,
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/05/02/improving-code-readability-with-css-styleguides/
but I have listened to Andy Clarke over Lynda.com saying that one should save
the white space as it
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Amrinder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Which approach is better? Should we go for code readability as described
by Smashing Magazine or follow what Andy said.
Why not do both? Use a coding style that suits you, then compress it for
live deployment.
--
- Matthew
Amrinder wrote:
I was reading this article on Smashing Magazine which shows how to
increase code readability
but I have listened to Andy Clarke ... saying that one should save
the white space as it increases the file size.
Which approach is better? Should we go for code readability as
)
A best of both worlds approach ;-
- Original Message
From: Amrinder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WebStandards Discussion Lish wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, 6 May, 2008 2:49:24 PM
Subject: [WSG] :: CSS Code Formatting ::
Which approach is better? Should we go for code
readability
performance tips.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ross Bruniges
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 4:31 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] :: CSS Code Formatting ::
Ultimately you want to use one version during your development process (to
ensure
Adding to my issues I put a image on the server that I want to show up
on my buttons but it isn't appearing. Here is how I added the CSS for that
The image is definitely
therehttp://theatomicconservative.typepad.com/images/atom.gif
/*define look of buttons*/
ul a{
display:block;
width: 98%;
On Dec 16, 2007 9:21 PM, Michael Horowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding to my issues I put a image on the server that I want to show up
on my buttons but it isn't appearing. Here is how I added the CSS for
that
The image is definitely
where in the folder structure is the css file?
On Dec 17, 2007 10:44 AM, krugonN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 16, 2007 9:21 PM, Michael Horowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding to my issues I put a image on the server that I want to show up
on my buttons but it isn't appearing. Here
try url(../images/atom.gif)
On Dec 17, 2007 10:44 AM, krugonN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 16, 2007 9:21 PM, Michael Horowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding to my issues I put a image on the server that I want to show up
on my buttons but it isn't appearing. Here is how I added the
On Dec 16, 2007 9:54 PM, Adam Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
where in the folder structure is the css file?
On Dec 17, 2007 10:44 AM, krugonN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 16, 2007 9:21 PM, Michael Horowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding to my issues I put a image on the server
That was a stupid mistake but when corrected I still have the issue. I
also should at least have had the hover working when I make that mistake
and it didn't show either
/*define look of buttons*/
ul a{
display:block;
width: 98%;
line-height:1.4em;
background:#1c1c1b url(images/atom.gif)
Solved it I had to use /images not images
Strange that it is so specific.
Michael Horowitz
Your Computer Consultant
http://yourcomputerconsultant.com
561-394-9079
Adam Martin wrote:
try url(../images/atom.gif)
On Dec 17, 2007 10:44 AM, krugonN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As I said you need to change to
background:#1c1c1b url(../images/atom.gif) no-repeat left bottom;
note the ../
On Dec 17, 2007 11:31 AM, Michael Horowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That was a stupid mistake but when corrected I still have the issue. I
also should at least have had the hover
Just a note I am having to modify the existing css by redefining the
established elements. I do see they use the alpha-inner name multiple
times to define inner areas of different divs
Here is how I see the xhtml
div id=pagebody
div id=pagebody-inner class=pkg
Figured it out. You can ignore this question.
Michael Horowitz
Your Computer Consultant
http://yourcomputerconsultant.com
561-394-9079
Michael Horowitz wrote:
I am wondering if there is an issue in how I am redefining
.module-content
{
margin: 5px 0 20px 0;
color: #FF;
I am wondering if there is an issue in how I am redefining
.module-content
{
margin: 5px 0 20px 0;
color: #FF;
font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', Verdana, sans-serif;
font-size: medium;
line-height: 150%;
text-align: left;
On 14 Dec 2007, at 17:32, Michael Horowitz wrote:
I am wondering if there is an issue in how I am redefining
.module-content
{
margin: 5px 0 20px 0;
color: #FF;
font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', Verdana, sans-serif;
font-size: medium;
line-height: 150%;
On 14 Dec 2007, at 18:06, Michael Horowitz wrote:
Figured it out. You can ignore this question.
no fair!
you're supposed to tell us what it was!
;)
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
What confused me is that alpha-inner is defined in multiple areas. I
needed to modify .layout-moblog1 #alpha-inner.
Not really sure why they define alpha-inner under different areas on css.
Michael Horowitz
Your Computer Consultant
http://yourcomputerconsultant.com
561-394-9079
Tony
I would like to have my buttons go to the end of the blue box on the
left and the right but when I try and expand it I lose the text
centering. I'm sure I am reading something wrong in CSS when I do
this. What would be the best way to do this.
http://theatomicconservative.typepad.com--
Hello,
I am pretty new to this group but have been seeing all of the useful
emails that have been sent over the past month and thought I would try
my luck.
I am working on a feature story box. I am trying to develop this using
web standards but since this is fairly new to me, I thought that I
Hi James,
I'd always create a site and content so that it initially works and
all the content can be reached using just HTML. It certainly won't
look all that pretty but by making sure that everything works fine
before you add CSS or JavaScript then you're ensuring that the site
will be usable
Dear Group,
I'm a relative newby to web design so please excuse me if this
question is simple.
The problem:
I don't have (or know how to have) a structured system of building my
style sheets. I find I keep just adding to the file until problems in
my output display start to develop. They very
-web.com/articles/architecting_css/
http://www.mezzoblue.com/css/cribsheet/
I hope this helps.
James
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rob Enslin
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 12:35 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] CSS help
-
From: Rob Enslin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 1:34 PM
Subject: [WSG] CSS help
Dear Group,
I'm a relative newby to web design so please excuse me if this
question is simple.
The problem:
I don't have (or know how to have
Rob Enslin wrote:
Is there a way, a logical procedure or rule which I should adopt to
prevent me from going forwards and backwards and constantly patching
it up?
A few: http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=MaintainableCss
regards
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
: Thursday, November 01, 2007 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS help
For some time now I have used the below as a foundation.
Adding inner classes to the main areas is best. #Nav_inner, #content_inner
etc
I have tested these in 98 operating system/browser combos and they are
rock solid:
http
Hello Rob,
I don't have (or know how to have) a structured
system of building my style sheets.
Maybe this will help?
A CSS Starter File
http://green-beast.com/blog/?p=109
Cheers.
Mike Cherim
***
List Guidelines:
@...James, Bruce, Georg and Mike thanks.
Plenty reading tonight - this info should get me going.
Cheers, Rob
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
As far as I'm aware, it's not something that Google will automatically
ban a site for anyway but if it is being used for black hat tactics
then the site is open to being reported by anyone (possibly a
competitor) which Google may then do a manual check of and ban the
site if they deem the site to
I agree with you Dave,
Google is not about to ban you, however if this is used in combination
with other known black hat tactics, then you will.
Google will check your CSS but once again, if you are using this
technique to excess, then you should be worried.
There was talk via a different
Google is not about to ban you, however if this is used in combination
with other known black hat tactics, then you will.
Google will check your CSS but once again, if you are using this technique
to excess, then you should be worried.
There was talk via a different email thread, and someone
Hi,
I am sure I read that CSS's display: none has a detrimental on SEO.
Is this true* or did I dream it?
*To clarify...I am keen to know if it is true that there is a
detrimental impact...not whether it is true that I read it or not.
Cheers,
Simon
On 29 Oct 2007, at 15:46, Simon Cockayne wrote:
Hi,
I am sure I read that CSS's display: none has a detrimental on SEO.
Is this true* or did I dream it?
*To clarify...I am keen to know if it is true that there is a
detrimental impact...not whether it is true that I read it or not.
Google
On 29 Oct 2007, at 17:43, James Jeffery wrote:
I highly doubt that presentational styles will effect SEO.
When you use display:none you are not removing the
content from the source, you are just hiding it from
users viewing the web page.
If you was to remove the element from the source using
It depends what you're using it for. If it's for black hat search
engine tactics which will contain keywords then yes it's bad as it can
get you completely banned from Google.
If it's for hiding an element of the page which you'll then be
displaying using either CSS or JavaScript then it's not
I highly doubt that presentational styles will effect SEO.
When you use display:none you are not removing the
content from the source, you are just hiding it from
users viewing the web page.
If you was to remove the element from the source using
DOM that would be different.
James
On 10/29/07,
Toney i was speaking in general, i didn't realize he was talking about
hiding keywords from visual view but so spiders see them.
I though he was on about Would hiding elements, such as replacing
navigation text with images, effect search engine spiders and would
the see the navigation text.
I am
In most cases, positioning the element off left of screen is a much
better approach than display:none. Accessibility does not mean that
all css is ignored, and in this case, display:none will probably be
adhered to by a screenreader.
If you can absolutely position an element, set it's left
This might prove useful - http://www.seomoz.org/blog/guide-to-hidden-text
My understanding is that yes, SEs do view some use of CSS dubiously, but
it's also been my understanding that it only applies to inline CSS (not
external stylesheets) and as an added safety measure, you can always add
On 30/10/07 (23:52) John said:
This might prove useful - http://www.seomoz.org/blog/guide-to-hidden-text
My understanding is that yes, SEs do view some use of CSS dubiously, but
it's also been my understanding that it only applies to inline CSS (not
external stylesheets) and as an added
Adding your css directory to your robots.txt would certainly be an
assurance, unless search engines started to attach screencaps to search
results. I was going to say it would be a great idea for future proofing
however now I'm wondering.
John Faulds wrote:
This might prove useful -
So the question is still open for me, and I'm curious; what is your
source of information for thinking that the big G only looks at inline
CSS?
It was a couple of years ago that I came across articles that suggested
this (I can't remember if anyone provided hard evidence to back it up). So
I highly doubt that presentational styles will effect SEO.
When you use display:none you are not removing the
content from the source, you are just hiding it from
users viewing the web page.
If you was to remove the element from the source using
DOM that would be different.
not if you are
Hi everyone,
The Fact is that SEOs use this CSS feature (display:none) for cloaking which
is a Black Hat SEO technique.
Further the whole idea of you showing something(h1-3 tags filled with
Keywords) to Google or any Search bot and hiding these from you end user
speaks very bad about your
Hi There,
You just need to put a rule in your style sheet to exempt images from
the hover style. This should work as a global rule:
#sidebar a img {border: none}
Hope this helps.
Tim
Olajide Olaolorun wrote:
Can someone please help me with this small problem i'm having I
seem to have
Your image is using the same a:hover properties as the text a:hover. so
give the image its own class or id attribute, with no border, so say...
.noborder{border:none} then add img class=noborder to the image
Ben
Olajide Olaolorun wrote:
Can someone please help me with this small
It doesnt work :(
I just tried it now... placed it in the default.css
On 10/23/07, Tim MacKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi There,
You just need to put a rule in your style sheet to exempt images from
the hover style. This should work as a global rule:
#sidebar a img {border: none}
Hope
Olajide Olaolorun wrote:
It doesnt work :(
I just tried it now... placed it in the default.css
On 10/23/07, Tim MacKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#sidebar a img {border: none}
I haven't looked at your code but you mentioned it not displaying a
border on hover so presumably you need this:
That doesnt work too Ben...
On 10/23/07, Web King Design [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your image is using the same a:hover properties as the text a:hover. so
give the image its own class or id attribute, with no border, so say...
.noborder{border:none} then add img class=noborder to the image
I think Chris is right. Set the a:hover to {border: none;}
Olajide Olaolorun wrote:
It doesnt work :(
I just tried it now... placed it in the default.css
On 10/23/07, Tim MacKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi There,
You just need to put a rule in your style sheet to exempt images from
the
Chris Knowles wrote:
#sidebar a:hover img {border: none}
I had a look at your code! - try this:
#sidebar .one-image a:hover {
border: 0 !important;
}
in your code you used:
#sidebar a:hover,.blogfoot a:hover{
border:1px solid #FFF !important;
}
because tou used important!
Chris Knowles wrote:
Chris Knowles wrote:
#sidebar a:hover img {border: none}
I had a look at your code! - try this:
#sidebar .one-image a:hover {
border: 0 !important;
}
Olajide,
because you are resetting a border of 1px to 0 the image will probably
move so you may need to
try this..
#yourimage a img{ border: none; }
OR
.yourimage{margin:0px}
.yourimage a{border:none}
.yourimage a:hover{border:none;}
Tim MacKay wrote:
I think Chris is right. Set the a:hover to {border: none;}
Olajide Olaolorun wrote:
It doesnt work :(
I just tried it now... placed it in
Try this...
a img { margin-bottom: -2px; vertical-align: sub; border: none;}
Worked for me in a similar situation.
David
On 24/10/2007, at 9:03 AM, Olajide Olaolorun wrote:
Can someone please help me with this small problem i'm having I
seem to have a problem with the link hover style i
Contrary to everything else put forth about the 'issue', this actually
works...
change
#sidebar a:hover,.blogfoot a:hover{
border:1px solid #FFF !important;
}
to
#sidebar li a:hover,.blogfoot a:hover{
border:1px solid #FFF !important;
}
add the li so it only applies to links inside the
Chris Wilson wrote:
Contrary to everything else put forth about the 'issue', this actually
works...
that statement isn't correct because this also works:
#sidebar .one-image a:hover {
border: 1px solid #000 !important;
}
The other attempts here try to fix a problem with an extra
Lex parsimoniae.
Cheers.
On 10/23/07, Chris Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Wilson wrote:
Contrary to everything else put forth about the 'issue', this actually
works...
that statement isn't correct because this also works:
#sidebar .one-image a:hover {
border: 1px
Chris Knowles solution works... both of them... I used the first one
though cause i didnt want the border at all. Under firefox, the border
cuts into the h3 title... so i dont mind the shifting
Thanks a lot guys
On 10/23/07, Chris Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Wilson wrote:
Hi again!
CSS considers only element nodes to be children or siblings. The DOM
does not.
This is a pedagogic discrepancy understandable to people used in
traversing the DOM who are frustrated that MSIE is natural with
nextSibling and that the rest are according to spec.[1] Something that
On 16/08/07, Keryx Web [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CSS considers only element nodes to be children or siblings. The DOM
does not.
Actually, selectors considers ONLY elements, never text nodes or
entity references (or comments, or PIs, or CDATA blocks or whatever).
Selectors work on the element
Here is the link to a website, and I've only gotten this far:
http://www.nichemktghouston.com/mneiman/physician.html
So far, It looks proper in IE7, but in Mozilla, the horizontal navigation
links do not center but rather move to the right so that I don't see the
full Contact link.
In
Hi,
I am out of office until Tue 13th August and will respond to your email on my
return.
Best Regards,
Ruairi
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
201 - 300 of 1168 matches
Mail list logo
