essage-
> From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 11:43 AM
> To: WSJT software development
> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] RRR as 73
>
> Mike --
>
>> But that only works if you are the receiver whereas the CQ'r is stuck
>> manuall
a separate option it would
help even more to each users about using RRR without the added 73.
73
Mike W9MDB
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 11:43 AM
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] RRR as 73
Mike --
Mike --
> But that only works if you are the receiver whereas the CQ'r is stuck
> manually doing these things after message#5. And yes, I know it's just two
> extra clicks and one extra mouse move but they are totally unnecessary if we
> just treat the two sides the same - equal representation an
h is what has
happened to me after over 8000 QSOs using WSJT-X.
Mike W9MDB
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 10:19 AM
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] RRR as 73
Hi Mike,
On 5/11/2015 1
Hi Mike,
On 5/11/2015 11:14 AM, Michael Black wrote:
> Since RRR is the 73 for the CQ side this is a simple patch that allows RRR
> to act the same as 73 for getting the log pop up window and advancing the
> Next button.
>
> Does this sound OK or are there other side effects?
In the recommended s
T software development; o...@sral.fi
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] RRR as 73
Greetings!
This is my first post to this developer list. I have been following this list
for quite some time already.
I have been active on JT modes for nearly 3 years now (HF exclusively) 2500+ JT
mode QSOs in th
Greetings!
This is my first post to this developer list. I have been following this
list for quite some time already.
I have been active on JT modes for nearly 3 years now (HF exclusively)
2500+ JT mode QSOs in the log.
Regarding this discussion on RRR & RR73 and speeding up the report exchange
h
;s was the norm like all other protocols.
Mike W9MDB
-Original Message-
From: Guy G4DWV/4X1LT [mailto:g...@drteeth.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 3:12 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] RRR as 73
Michael Black writes:
>
>
> Since RRR is the 73 for
Michael Black writes:
>
>
> Since RRR is the 73 for the CQ side this is a simple patch that allows RRR
to act the same as 73 for getting the log pop up window and advancing the
Next button.
> Does this sound OK or are there other side effects?
If RRR is the 73 for the CQ side, changing it to R
Since RRR is the 73 for the CQ side this is a simple patch that allows RRR
to act the same as 73 for getting the log pop up window and advancing the
Next button.
Does this sound OK or are there other side effects?
73
Mike W9MDB
Index: mainwindow.cpp
=
10 matches
Mail list logo
