Tom Russo wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 12:15:52PM -0500, we recorded a bogon-computron collision of
the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
I'll add my 2 cents into this discussion.
I use automaps. The way that I use them is that I have all of my "normal" maps
setup as automaps="yes". I
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 12:15:52PM -0500, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
> I'll add my 2 cents into this discussion.
>
> I use automaps. The way that I use them is that I have all of my "normal" maps
> setup as automaps="yes". I have a varie
I'll add my 2 cents into this discussion.
I use automaps. The way that I use them is that I have all of my "normal" maps
setup as automaps="yes". I have a variety of maps in this category:
terraserver
radar
shapefiles of just the USA (with states)
shapefiles for counties
interstate roads
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 05:53:36PM -0500, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
> On Dec 6, 2006, at 16:03, Tom Russo wrote:
>
> >>So you don't have many maps? I've installed maps for trial
> >>purposes, but since they add time to the display ref
On Dec 6, 2006, at 16:03, Tom Russo wrote:
So you don't have many maps? I've installed maps for trial
purposes, but since they add time to the display refresh and am
not presently using them I have them turned off. So you have just
a few maps you always use and delete or otherwise remove al
A few months back, someone (I think it was Jason) posted the
RidgeXXX.geo radar files.These do seem to be stable. I have been using
these (the ridge radars) for the last 3 months with no problems. Could
this be a fix?
Z
I've been here enough to have heard all the discussions of
color level
on 12/6/2006 3:09 PM Tom Russo said the following:
I've been here enough to have heard all the discussions of
color levels, transparency, and et cetera. It'd be nice to get a more
permanent solution to this problem.
That solution has to come from the source of the images, and is not somethi
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 03:34:06PM -0500, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
>
> Incidentally I find the radars almost completely unusable since they
> are completely black now. At times they work, but they break too
> often.
Agreed. The
Chip G. wrote:
On Dec 6, 2006, at 12:26, Curt, WE7U wrote:
Now... Should we eventually implement a MapSet feature, where you
can select different groups of maps at once (and probably a different
set of properties for each), would you then migrate to the new system
or would you still be missi
On Dec 6, 2006, at 15:30, Steve Friis wrote:
There are two ways that I am aware of to turn on and off maps. You
seem to have a grasp of the first method. If Auto Maps is
unselected under the tool bar, any maps selected in the
tool bar will now be enabled.
Probably a poor explanation, an
On Dec 6, 2006, at 12:26, Curt, WE7U wrote:
Now... Should we eventually implement a MapSet feature, where you
can select different groups of maps at once (and probably a
different set of properties for each), would you then migrate to
the new system or would you still be missing something
Chip G. wrote:
On Dec 6, 2006, at 09:57, Steve Friis wrote:
For me, 1000 is my bottom most layer. I use layers up to 9.
Weather is put at 2000, so that state and county boundaries show on
top of the weather data. This allows me to be able to see exactly
where the storms are in relation to
Tom Russo wrote:
(or removed
from the code).
Not yet --- people use it, and removing it would hurt them.
Well, as all of you know by now, I am not a programmer. Just a vocal
(and some times causticly so) user.
I have an idea though I have no idea how it would work or be
implem
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 09:26:24AM -0800, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Steve Friis wrote:
>
> > I use auto maps. I have two main configurations. The first is set up in
> > Auto maps. The second configuration I have s
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Steve Friis wrote:
> I use auto maps. I have two main configurations. The first is set up in
> Auto maps. The second configuration I have set up as selected maps.
> Turning on auto maps disables the regular selected maps, so they don't
> show up in the display. I thought
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 06:03:20AM -0800, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
> > 2. The default configuration of the worldhi.map is that it is
> > Automaps=yes and Layer=1000. I am good with the first option but not
> > the second. The idea behin
Curt, WE7U wrote:
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Chip G. wrote:
2. The default configuration of the worldhi.map is that it is
Automaps=yes and Layer=1000. I am good with the first option but not
the second. The idea behind the default map is to help those who have
no maps (i.e., just starting out), no
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Chip G. wrote:
> I just did a CVS update and rebuild of Xastir. Once again upon
> restart I immediately noticed the "worldhi" map overlaying the
> Tigermap. When I brought up the "Map Chooser" I didn't see the
> worldhi map available to change. After fiddling a bit (rebuilds,
>
I posted a little about the following a few weeks back. Now I have
more information and a request.
I just did a CVS update and rebuild of Xastir. Once again upon
restart I immediately noticed the "worldhi" map overlaying the
Tigermap. When I brought up the "Map Chooser" I didn't see the
w
19 matches
Mail list logo
