[xmail] ANNOUNCE: XQM Agent 1.25

2003-07-14 Thread Harald Schneider
This is for Linux and FreeBSD platform only. Fixes a bug which caused the Agent not to daemonize on some systems. Download from http://xmail.marketmix.com --Harald - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: s

[xmail] help

2003-07-14 Thread 徐泳
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] 1.17-pre01 for Unix users

2003-07-14 Thread Davide Libenzi
Could Unix users give it a spin. Expecially ones using external commands. http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.17-pre01.tar.gz I'd like to receive feedback from BSD and Solaris users if possible. This fixes the fast external programs exit that makes XMail unable to sync with the child. - Davi

[xmail] Re: Log Rotation

2003-07-14 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Richard Mayhew wrote: > Hmm Interesting... > > Heres my info... > > RedHat Linux 7.3 (With All Updates) Kernel - Linux starfire 2.4.20 #1 Fri > Feb 7 10:29:48 SAST 2003 i586 unknown > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] new]# date > Tue Jul 15 01:40:17 SAST 2003 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] new]# > >

[xmail] Re: IMAP

2003-07-14 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Richard Mayhew wrote: > > Thanks, but this doesn't help me much as I need to have the whole message > using the format. Pity. > Is there no way I can Trick XMail in to leaving the whole message untouched > after I have converted it to the format? > > Let me also see if I ca

[xmail] Re: Log Rotation

2003-07-14 Thread Richard Mayhew
Hmm Interesting... Heres my info... RedHat Linux 7.3 (With All Updates) Kernel - Linux starfire 2.4.20 #1 Fri Feb 7 10:29:48 SAST 2003 i586 unknown [EMAIL PROTECTED] new]# date Tue Jul 15 01:40:17 SAST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] new]# /var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-20030619 /var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-20

[xmail] Re: IMAP

2003-07-14 Thread Richard Mayhew
Thanks, but this doesn't help me much as I need to have the whole message using the format. Pity. Is there no way I can Trick XMail in to leaving the whole message untouched after I have converted it to the format? Let me also see if I can get Courier IMAP to read rather than just . Thanks

[xmail] Re: Log Rotation

2003-07-14 Thread Tracy
At 19:22 7/14/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > /var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307092300 > > /var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307102300 > > /var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307112300 > > /var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307122300 > > /var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307132300 > > /var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307142300 > > > > How

[xmail] Re: Log Rotation

2003-07-14 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Richard Mayhew wrote: > Yup, its synced using NTP every 12hrs. > > /var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307092300 > /var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307102300 > /var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307112300 > /var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307122300 > /var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307132300 > /var/MailRoot/

[xmail] Re: IMAP

2003-07-14 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Richard Mayhew wrote: > Hey There, > > Ta, Hmm I must have done something wrong, cos my little test script which > converts the message to the format made no impression on the message. > > #!/bin/sh > /bin/echo "FILE $1" >> /tmp/mail.log > /usr/bin/dos2unix -k -q $1 > exit 7

[xmail] Re: Log Rotation

2003-07-14 Thread Richard Mayhew
Yup, its synced using NTP every 12hrs. /var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307092300 /var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307102300 /var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307112300 /var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307122300 /var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307132300 /var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307142300 How does XMail do its log rotation?

[xmail] Re: Log Rotation

2003-07-14 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Richard Mayhew wrote: > Hi > > Can one get XMail to rotate its logs at a given time? Ie 00:00 rather than > its default 23:00. > It used to be 00:00 prior to v1.15. Duh ! I got rotation at 00:00, are you sure your time settings are ok ? - Davide - To unsubscribe from thi

[xmail] Re: IMAP

2003-07-14 Thread Richard Mayhew
Hey There, Ta, Hmm I must have done something wrong, cos my little test script which converts the message to the format made no impression on the message. #!/bin/sh /bin/echo "FILE $1" >> /tmp/mail.log /usr/bin/dos2unix -k -q $1 exit 7 The script does run but the file doesn't seemed to be chan

[xmail] Log Rotation

2003-07-14 Thread Richard Mayhew
Hi Can one get XMail to rotate its logs at a given time? Ie 00:00 rather than its default 23:00. It used to be 00:00 prior to v1.15. Thanks. -- Kind Regards Richard Mayhew Splash Internet and Networking Consultants CC http://www.splash.co.za Tel: 083 3018307 Fax: 083 83018307 - To unsubs

[xmail] Re: IMAP

2003-07-14 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Richard Mayhew wrote: > Hi All, > > I have been able to integrate Courier IMAP and XMail together with very > little fuss. > > I used Courier with the userdb auth method, a small convert script which I > wrote and a few config changes. It runs like a dream except for the way

[xmail] IMAP

2003-07-14 Thread Richard Mayhew
Hi All, I have been able to integrate Courier IMAP and XMail together with very little fuss. I used Courier with the userdb auth method, a small convert script which I wrote and a few config changes. It runs like a dream except for the way XMail writes its messages to disk. XMail writes its me

[xmail] ANNOUNCE: XQM 1.36 WIN32

2003-07-14 Thread Harald Schneider
If you downloaded today's release of XQM and its Agent for Win32 platform, make sure that their version is 1.36 (XQM) and 1.24 (Agent). The download links were pointing to the old archives for some hours. In that case olease download again. Sorry for the inmommodities! --Harald - To unsubscribe

[xmail] Re: email routing problem

2003-07-14 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Hamilton Thurgood wrote: > > I have done something wrong with my xmail setup but > havn't got a clue what I've done > > users are setup on an internal email server, an extalias.tab file > is set so that all users have an external email alias. If an email > is sent using their

[xmail] Re: Is that correct?

2003-07-14 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: > > Another test from abuse.net > Relay test 1 > >>> RSET > <<< 250 OK > >>> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <<< 250 OK > >>> RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <<< 250 OK > >>> DATA > <<< 354 Start mail input; end with . > >>> (message body) > <<< 250 OK > >

[xmail] Re: Is that correct?

2003-07-14 Thread Tracy
At 13:55 7/14/2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: >I did get the final email, so in my case it's open relay. >Moreover, I personally believe that having then email received (but not >delieverd), is as bad. When you use that test, are you sending the email to an address that is not on your local server?

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: > > Yes!! that solved it- If this is true *and* if it is true that the XMail machine is a DNS server, this likely means that he is a forwarding DNS server (using another server to query). - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns

[xmail] Re: Is that correct?

2003-07-14 Thread Michael Lugassy
Tracy, I did get the final email, so in my case it's open relay. Moreover, I personally believe that having then email received (but not delieverd), is as bad. Michael. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general

[xmail] Re: Is that correct?

2003-07-14 Thread Tracy
At 13:30 7/14/2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: >I have a user with a "*" alias. (aliases.tab = "relaydomain.com" "*" "info") > >I run the open relat test on: http://members.iinet.net.au/~remmie/relay/ > >Server was accepting relay: > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ><<< 250 OK > MA

[xmail] Re: Is that correct?

2003-07-14 Thread Michael Lugassy
Another test from abuse.net Relay test 1 >>> RSET <<< 250 OK >>> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <<< 250 OK >>> RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <<< 250 OK >>> DATA <<< 354 Start mail input; end with . >>> (message body) <<< 250 OK My SMTPRELAY.TAB was the only file changed, it looks like this: "166.139

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Rob Arends
if you are using the dns on the same box, then I'd use 127.0.0.1 (if your dns is listening on it), because xmail wont need to look it up every time there is a mail to send. Being on the same box udp or tcp, is probably no difference. Rob :-) > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] Is that correct?

2003-07-14 Thread Michael Lugassy
Davide, I have a user with a "*" alias. (aliases.tab = "relaydomain.com" "*" "info") I run the open relat test on: http://members.iinet.net.au/~remmie/relay/ Server was accepting relay: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <<< 250 OK MAIL FROM: <<< 250 OK RCPT TO: <<< 250 OK

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Michael Lugassy
Rob, > This maybe caused by a firewall, some FWs don't allow internal servers to > use the external NAT addresses. Now if Xmail was looking up dns records > from the rrot-servers, then eventually xmail would be trying to lookup the > dns server on itself but using the external IP. > The packet

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Tracy
At 12:54 7/14/2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: > > Which flavor of OS are you running? Your mention of ASP makes me think it > > might be Windows. If so, try the following from a command prompt: > > > > And see what you get back for each one. Again, using my own domain as an > > example, your session m

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Michael Lugassy
Yes!! that solved it- > Search the doco for SmartDNSHost > Thank you so much Rob, Tracy and Davide!! Michael. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EM

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Rob Arends
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael Lugassy > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 2:55 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net > > > > Tracy (and Davide)- > > > Which flavor of OS are you running? Your mention

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Rob Arends
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Davide Libenzi > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 1:34 AM > To: XMail mailing list > Subject: [xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net > > > > On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: > > > > > Looks like we're gett

[xmail] email routing problem

2003-07-14 Thread Hamilton Thurgood
I have done something wrong with my xmail setup but havn't got a clue what I've done users are setup on an internal email server, an extalias.tab file is set so that all users have an external email alias. If an email is sent using their external email name both the sender and the recipient rece

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Michael Lugassy
Tracy (and Davide)- > Which flavor of OS are you running? Your mention of ASP makes me think it > might be Windows. If so, try the following from a command prompt: > > And see what you get back for each one. Again, using my own domain as an > example, your session might look something like this:

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Rob Arends
Michael, By default Xmail server will do the DNS lookup via the root-servers.net, not via the OS configured resolver. If you set Xmail to pass the request to the 'SmartDNSHost' then this would help -> IF your current DNS works as u say it does. Search the doco for SmartDNSHost SmartDNSHost[TAB]d

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Tracy
At 12:35 7/14/2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: >Is that the way I should define it? > >Here's my smtprelay.tab: > >"164.149.214.100" "255.255.255.255" >"164.149.214.101" "255.255.255.255" >"164.149.214.102" "255.255.255.255" >"164.149.214.103" "255.255.255.255" >"164.149.214.104" "255.255.255.255" >"16

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: > > Looks like we're getting close. > > The messages ARE delivered correctly, but not in a timely fashion. > It takes about 20 minutes to deliver messages to external domains and 0 > seconds to deliver them to local users. > > Is there a timeout or dela

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: > > Davide, > > > Yes, a lot thx. Your XMail machine cannot fire DNS queries *or* the target > > domain does not have neiher MX nor A records. > > My machine IS a DNS server as well, and the MX/A records are valid (I'm sure > because I can connect them

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Michael Lugassy
Looks like we're getting close. The messages ARE delivered correctly, but not in a timely fashion. It takes about 20 minutes to deliver messages to external domains and 0 seconds to deliver them to local users. Is there a timeout or delay option I have set up wrong somewhere? Thanks, Michael.

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Michael Lugassy
Tracy hi, Is that the way I should define it? Here's my smtprelay.tab: "164.149.214.100" "255.255.255.255" "164.149.214.101" "255.255.255.255" "164.149.214.102" "255.255.255.255" "164.149.214.103" "255.255.255.255" "164.149.214.104" "255.255.255.255" "164.149.214.105" "255.255.255.255" "164.149

[xmail] Re: Message filter problem with xmail 1.16 on linux

2003-07-14 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Calin Florescu wrote: > > When a filter exits too fast, an error -121 ERR_PROCESS_EXECUTE is > triggered, the exit code is ignored and the message is delivered anyway. > After I insert a delay (sleep) for 3 seconds, the filter works ok. (I have > also a virus scanner filter w

[xmail] Message filter problem with xmail 1.16 on linux

2003-07-14 Thread Calin Florescu
When a filter exits too fast, an error -121 ERR_PROCESS_EXECUTE is triggered, the exit code is ignored and the message is delivered anyway. After I insert a delay (sleep) for 3 seconds, the filter works ok. (I have also a virus scanner filter which works great and the only difference is time consu

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Tracy
At 11:53 7/14/2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: > > Yes, a lot thx. Your XMail machine cannot fire DNS queries *or* the target > > domain does not have neiher MX nor A records. > >My machine IS a DNS server as well, and the MX/A records are valid (I'm sure >because I can connect them and retrieve mail o

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Michael Lugassy
Davide, > Yes, a lot thx. Your XMail machine cannot fire DNS queries *or* the target > domain does not have neiher MX nor A records. My machine IS a DNS server as well, and the MX/A records are valid (I'm sure because I can connect them and retrieve mail on them). What do you think? Michael.

[xmail] Re: Large mail delivery fails without notification

2003-07-14 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Tim Christensen wrote: > my xmail-server is having problems delivering mails that exceed the mail > limit of the destination server. > i see from the logs that the mail is actually processed but it doesn't occur > in the smail logs and is not delivered. > > here's an example

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: > > Tracy, > > > What is in the associated slog file for those messages? > > << > ErrCode = -103 > ErrString = Error in function {stat} > SMAIL SMTP-Send FF = "externaldomain.com" SMTP = "mail.mymailserver.com" > >From = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" To = "[EMA

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: > > Use smtprelay.tab to restict relaying, not smtpauth.tab. Also you don't > > need smtpauth.tab for SMTP authentication. XMail does the first lookup > > inside the account database. Not sure what you men for "refferes". > > > > Sorry, I used smtprelay

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Tracy
At 11:36 7/14/2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: > > Use smtprelay.tab to restict relaying, not smtpauth.tab. Also you don't > > need smtpauth.tab for SMTP authentication. XMail does the first lookup > > inside the account database. Not sure what you men for "refferes". > > > >Sorry, I used smtprelay.tab

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Michael Lugassy
Tracy, > What is in the associated slog file for those messages? << ErrCode = -103 ErrString = Error in function {stat} SMAIL SMTP-Send FF = "externaldomain.com" SMTP = "mail.mymailserver.com" >From = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" To = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Failed ! SMTP-Error = "417 Temporary delivery er

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Michael Lugassy
Davide, > Use smtprelay.tab to restict relaying, not smtpauth.tab. Also you don't > need smtpauth.tab for SMTP authentication. XMail does the first lookup > inside the account database. Not sure what you men for "refferes". > Sorry, I used smtprelay.tab (not smtpauth) - that has FAILED the abuse

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Tracy
At 11:31 7/14/2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: > > use mailproc.tab and "redirect" switch. > > see the doc für details. > >I set up relay succesfuly, for 3 different emails (1 is of an internal/local >domain, the other 2 are external domains accoutns) - the local user has got >the message, the other 2

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Michael Lugassy
Hi again, > use mailproc.tab and "redirect" switch. > see the doc für details. I set up relay succesfuly, for 3 different emails (1 is of an internal/local domain, the other 2 are external domains accoutns) - the local user has got the message, the other 2 - not. (I can see their message stuck i

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Sönke Ruempler
> Hi there, > > I'm trying to restrict my xmail 1.16 server to allow SENDING only on very > specific issues: > > 1) e-mails originating from my web server (a set of 8 IPs). > I basically use a number of ASP pages that send out mail to outside cusomers > using CDONTS. > If the e-mails were created

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: > I'm trying to restrict my xmail 1.16 server to allow SENDING only on very > specific issues: > > 1) e-mails originating from my web server (a set of 8 IPs). > I basically use a number of ASP pages that send out mail to outside cusomers > using CDONTS.

[xmail] Re: what's that?

2003-07-14 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: > and most important, do I need it? > [PeekTime] 1058188710 : Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:18:30 +0200 It's the delivery attempt timestamp that is inside the slog files. Why do you care ? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

[xmail] Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Michael Lugassy
Hi there, I'm trying to restrict my xmail 1.16 server to allow SENDING only on very specific issues: 1) e-mails originating from my web server (a set of 8 IPs). I basically use a number of ASP pages that send out mail to outside cusomers using CDONTS. If the e-mails were created and sent from th

[xmail] what's that?

2003-07-14 Thread Michael Lugassy
and most important, do I need it? [PeekTime] 1058188710 : Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:18:30 +0200 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] Large mail delivery fails without notification

2003-07-14 Thread Tim Christensen
Hi! my xmail-server is having problems delivering mails that exceed the mail limit of the destination server. i see from the logs that the mail is actually processed but it doesn't occur in the smail logs and is not delivered. here's an example sniff of such a too large mail delivery: 220 mailse

[xmail] ANNOUNCE: XMail Queue Manager 1.36 and more ...

2003-07-14 Thread Harald Schneider
You can download the latest release of XQM, XQM/CMD and XQM Agent at http://xmail.marketmix.com --- Changes --- Generally: - Fixed a date problem - New config settings FORCE_MAILROOT and FORCE_SERVICENAME - WIN32: Registry keys are not needed anymore. - A preflight thread clears the queue from z