[xmail] Re: Filtering mystery

2003-07-23 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, William wrote: I sent myself a test message with nothing more than test in the body, and yet it comes up as? Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:04:26 UTC;[EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED]; # SPAMSCORE: 10 I have removed the entry but why in the world

[xmail] Re: Filtering mystery

2003-07-23 Thread William
You're using SA, aren't you ? No, unfortunately it doesn't work on my 2k box. Looks like others have been working on getting it going so I am going to follow that up. Currently I am using XMail 1.10 because of my inability to get the codes 97-99 to set properly using XScanner filter, it would

[xmail] Re: Filtering mystery

2003-07-23 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, William wrote: You're using SA, aren't you ? No, unfortunately it doesn't work on my 2k box. Looks like others have been working on getting it going so I am going to follow that up. Currently I am using XMail 1.10 because of my inability to get the codes 97-99 to

[xmail] Re: Filtering mystery

2003-07-23 Thread William
Don't you have the source code ? Yes, I'll take a peek. Sadly however my knowlege of C is cursory at best. My current filter works very simply, with a code at the end of the string defining my spam contentfilter.def entry looks like so example string blah blah#6 --- the spam score value

[xmail] Re: Filtering mystery

2003-07-23 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, William wrote: Don't you have the source code ? Yes, I'll take a peek. Sadly however my knowlege of C is cursory at best. My current filter works very simply, with a code at the end of the string defining my spam contentfilter.def entry looks like so example

[xmail] Re: Filtering mystery

2003-07-23 Thread William
Look at its doc, you can pass the return code inside the .tab file. Thats rather what I figured, since thats how my current filter works now. XScanner.txt leaves me with: 7. Check out documentation for return codes (97, 98 or 99). So, example spam string becomes example spam string#99 ?

[xmail] Re: Filtering mystery

2003-07-23 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, William wrote: Look at its doc, you can pass the return code inside the .tab file. Thats rather what I figured, since thats how my current filter works now. XScanner.txt leaves me with: 7. Check out documentation for return codes (97, 98 or 99). So, example spam

[xmail] Re: Filtering mystery

2003-07-23 Thread William
c:\xscanner\xscanner.exe[TAB]c:\xscanner[TAB]@@FILE[TAB]@@FROM[TAB] @@RCPT[TAB]Retcode Don't add a \ to the second argument! where c:\xscanner\xscanner.exe is the full path to executable name and c:\xscanner the directory where to find xscanner.dat file. I had that exactly, and even

[xmail] Re: Filtering mystery

2003-07-23 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, William wrote: c:\xscanner\xscanner.exe[TAB]c:\xscanner[TAB]@@FILE[TAB]@@FROM[TAB] @@RCPT[TAB]Retcode Don't add a \ to the second argument! where c:\xscanner\xscanner.exe is the full path to executable name and c:\xscanner the directory where to find

[xmail] Re: Filtering mystery

2003-07-23 Thread William
You set the Retcode inside the .tab file and XMail will pass the same value to xscanner.exe, that in turn will exit with such code in case it'll find something. I didn't do that app though, you might want to bug the developer eventually. I will experiment more, thanks for taking the time to