[Zeitgeist] [Bug 603326] Re: Blacklist doesn't support ignore everything containing X in the URI

2011-04-29 Thread Roger Binns
I have this same problem. I do software development and when I am doing testing I don't want items from the test directories showing up. Having all that noise (a *LOT* of it) makes zeitgeist useless to me. (Some convoluted global turn recording off and on again system may also work but would be

[Zeitgeist] [Bug 603326] Re: Blacklist doesn't support ignore everything containing X in the URI

2010-07-19 Thread Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
I am with Markus here. You might also want to blacklist files which contain a seven-letter palindrome in the URI, but only when Jupiter aligns with Mars - that's up to you! ;-) '*private*' is not a good use case imho. For instance there is a unity- private/ directory in the Unity sources. What

Re: [Zeitgeist] [Bug 603326] Re: Blacklist doesn't support ignore everything containing X in the URI

2010-07-19 Thread Siegfried Gevatter
OK, I don't feel like arguing about this now so I'll forget it (until someone else requests it). By the way, there's also another topic which is the big kill switch (aka firefox private mode); any comments on how we want to implement this? Two new D-Bus methods in the D-Bus extension (Set/Get) to

[Zeitgeist] [Bug 603326] Re: Blacklist doesn't support ignore everything containing X in the URI

2010-07-09 Thread Markus Korn
From my point of view this bug is Wont't fix as using (event-) templates for almost everything in zeitgeist is a well discussed design decission, and 1.) we don't support *boo* queries, only boo* 2.) I don't think it makes sense to not use event_templates in blacklists And if you *really* want

Re: [Zeitgeist] [Bug 603326] Re: Blacklist doesn't support ignore everything containing X in the URI

2010-07-09 Thread Siegfried Gevatter
Hey, 2010/7/9 Markus Korn thek...@gmx.de:  1.) we don't support *boo* queries, only boo* Well, this isn't a querym, Blacklisting is something completely unrelated. As a side note: Why do you want to block an event just because it has 'private' in its uri? Why not? It's my choice what I want