shriram agarwal wrote:
> hi ,
> i want to intercept IO on ZFS at vnode layer, i changed vnodeops pointer for
> zfs in vfs frame work but i only get IO for creating new file but i dont get
> for read,lookup,write,changing setattribute etc.
>
> can somebody explain why ? and how can i achieve that
Greetings,
I have Sun Fire 4600 running Solaris 10, running Sun Cluster 3.2.
SunOS hubdb004 5.10 Generic_120012-14 i86pc i386 i86pc
We ran into some space issues in /usr today, so as a quick fix, I created a
slice (c5t0d0s12) with about 25GB of disk in order to create some zfs
filesystems with m
If df dumps core, then it is broken. Please file a bug against it.
-- richard
Solaris wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have Sun Fire 4600 running Solaris 10, running Sun Cluster 3.2.
>
> SunOS hubdb004 5.10 Generic_120012-14 i86pc i386 i86pc
>
> We ran into some space issues in /usr today, so as a qui
I have a customer who has implemented the following layout: As you can
see, he has mostly raidz zvols but has one raidz2 in the same zpool.
What are the implications here? Is this a bad thing to do? Please
elaborate.
Thanks,
Scott Gaspard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> NAMESTATE REA
Hello Scott,
Wednesday, March 12, 2008, 4:41:21 PM, you wrote:
SG> I have a customer who has implemented the following layout: As you can
SG> see, he has mostly raidz zvols but has one raidz2 in the same zpool.
SG> What are the implications here? Is this a bad thing to do? Please
SG> elabora
Hi,
Sorry if this is a RTM issue - but I wanted to be sure before continuing. I
received a corrupted file error on one of my pools. I removed the file, and the
status command now shows the following:
> zpool status -v rpool
pool: rpool
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experience
On Mar 12, 2008, at 12:35 PM, Ben Middleton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry if this is a RTM issue - but I wanted to be sure before
> continuing. I received a corrupted file error on one of my pools. I
> removed the file, and the status command now shows the following:
>
>> zpool status -v rpool
> p
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:41:21AM -0500, Scott Gaspard wrote:
> I have a customer who has implemented the following layout: As you can
> see, he has mostly raidz zvols but has one raidz2 in the same zpool.
> What are the implications here? Is this a bad thing to do? Please
> elaborate.
It's
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 09:59:53PM +, A Darren Dunham wrote:
> It's not *bad*, but as far as I'm concerned, it's wasted space.
>
> You have to deal with the pool as a whole as having single-disk
> redundancy for failure modes. So the fact that one section of it has
> two-disk redundancy doesn
I'm currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out user
home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba.
I have samba configured and integrated into our local active directory,
with ACL mapping working. I'm a little confused as to the behavior of the
ZFS ACL tho
Paul B. Henson wrote:
> I'm currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out user
> home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba.
>
> I have samba configured and integrated into our local active directory,
> with ACL mapping working. I'm a little confused as to
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Roy Butler wrote:
> CIFS ACLs and NFS ACLs are not on a convergence course, are they? Maybe
NFSv4 ACLs (the ZFS native ACL) are based on CIFS/NT ACLs and virtually
identical. The Sun version of Samba does just about a perfect mapping
between them.
> a NetApp could do some
Occasionally the topic arises about what to do when a file is
corrupted. ZFS will tell you about it, but what then? Usually
the conversation then degenerates into how some people can
tolerate broken mp3 files or whatever.
Well, the other day I found a corrupted file which gave me an
opportunity
> i want to intercept IO on ZFS at vnode layer,
> i changed vnodeops pointer for zfs in vfs frame work
> but i only get IO for creating new file but i dont
> get for read,lookup,write,changing setattribute
> etc. can somebody explain why ?
Which vnodeops pointer did you change?
ZFS, unlike most f
Hi Richard,
Richard Elling wrote:
> Occasionally the topic arises about what to do when a file is
> corrupted. ZFS will tell you about it, but what then? Usually
> the conversation then degenerates into how some people can
> tolerate broken mp3 files or whatever.
>
> Well, the other day I found a
15 matches
Mail list logo
