Re: [zfs-discuss] Confused about prerequisites for ZFS to work

2009-02-19 Thread Harry Putnam
Blake blake.ir...@gmail.com writes: [...] I found this entry helpful: http://blogs.sun.com/timthomas/entry/solaris_cifs_in_workgroup_mode There is a comment in those directions about installing a SMB PAM module: 6. Install the SMB PAM module Add the below line to the end of

Re: [zfs-discuss] Confused about prerequisites for ZFS to work

2009-02-19 Thread Enda O'Connor
On 02/19/09 13:14, Harry Putnam wrote: Blake blake.ir...@gmail.com writes: [...] I found this entry helpful: http://blogs.sun.com/timthomas/entry/solaris_cifs_in_workgroup_mode There is a comment in those directions about installing a SMB PAM module: 6. Install the SMB PAM module Add

Re: [zfs-discuss] Confused about prerequisites for ZFS to work

2009-02-19 Thread James C. McPherson
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:14:07 -0600 Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote: Blake blake.ir...@gmail.com writes: [...] I found this entry helpful: http://blogs.sun.com/timthomas/entry/solaris_cifs_in_workgroup_mode There is a comment in those directions about installing a SMB PAM

Re: [zfs-discuss] Confused about prerequisites for ZFS to work

2009-02-19 Thread Enda O'Connor
On 02/19/09 13:20, James C. McPherson wrote: On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:14:07 -0600 Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote: Blake blake.ir...@gmail.com writes: [...] I found this entry helpful: http://blogs.sun.com/timthomas/entry/solaris_cifs_in_workgroup_mode There is a comment in those

[zfs-discuss] RFE for two-level ZFS

2009-02-19 Thread Gary Mills
Should I file an RFE for this addition to ZFS? The concept would be to run ZFS on a file server, exporting storage to an application server where ZFS also runs on top of that storage. All storage management would take place on the file server, where the physical disks reside. The application

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs root, jumpstart and flash archives

2009-02-19 Thread Jerry Kemp
Hello Lori, Thank you again for the quick reply. Unfortunately, I had mistakenly anticipated a somewhat quicker integration than Solaris 10u8. Approaching this from another angle, would it be possible for me to build a jumpstart server using a current Solaris Nevada b107/SXCE, and to

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs root, jumpstart and flash archives

2009-02-19 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Jerry, Thursday, February 19, 2009, 4:34:16 AM, you wrote: JK Hello Lori, JK Thank you again for the quick reply. JK Unfortunately, I had mistakenly anticipated a somewhat quicker JK integration than Solaris 10u8. JK Approaching this from another angle, would it be possible for me to

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs root, jumpstart and flash archives

2009-02-19 Thread Lori Alt
On 02/18/09 21:24, Jerry Kemp wrote: Hello Lori, Thank you again for the quick reply. Unfortunately, I had mistakenly anticipated a somewhat quicker integration than Solaris 10u8. Approaching this from another angle, would it be possible for me to build a jumpstart server using a current

Re: [zfs-discuss] Confused about prerequisites for ZFS to work

2009-02-19 Thread Robert Thurlow
Harry Putnam wrote: There is a comment in those directions about installing a SMB PAM module: 6. Install the SMB PAM module Add the below line to the end of /etc/pam.conf: other password required pam_smb_passwd.so.1 nowarn Do you know what that is? It's part of the

Re: [zfs-discuss] RFE for two-level ZFS

2009-02-19 Thread Richard Elling
Gary Mills wrote: Should I file an RFE for this addition to ZFS? The concept would be to run ZFS on a file server, exporting storage to an application server where ZFS also runs on top of that storage. All storage management would take place on the file server, where the physical disks reside.

Re: [zfs-discuss] RFE for two-level ZFS

2009-02-19 Thread Miles Nordin
gm == Gary Mills mi...@cc.umanitoba.ca writes: gm ZFS on a file server, exporting storage to an application gm server where ZFS also runs on top of that storage. All gm storage management would take place on the file server, where gm the physical disks reside. The application

Re: [zfs-discuss] RFE for two-level ZFS

2009-02-19 Thread jkait
gm == Gary Mills mi...@cc.umanitoba.ca writes: gm ZFS on a file server, exporting storage to an application gm server where ZFS also runs on top of that storage. All gm storage management would take place on the file server, where gm the physical disks reside. The application

Re: [zfs-discuss] RFE for two-level ZFS

2009-02-19 Thread Miles Nordin
j == jkait jkait...@gmail.com writes: j [b] The Lustre team, I believe, is looking at porting the DMU j **not** the entire zfs stack. wow. That's even more awesome. In that case, since they are more or less making their own filesystem, maybe it will be natural to validate checksums

Re: [zfs-discuss] RFE for two-level ZFS

2009-02-19 Thread Brandon High
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Gary Mills mi...@cc.umanitoba.ca wrote: Should I file an RFE for this addition to ZFS? The concept would be to run ZFS on a file server, exporting storage to an application server where ZFS also runs on top of that storage. All storage management would take