type: 'disk'
id: 0
guid: 2101335193002161906
path: '/dev/dsk/c0d0s0'
devid: 'id1,c...@aqemu_harddisk=qm1/a'
phys_path: '/p...@0,0/pci-...@1,1/i...@0/c...@0,0:a'
whole_disk: 0
get fixed. His use case is very compelling - I
know lots of SOHO folks who could really use a NAS where this 'just worked'
The ZFS team has done well by thinking liberally about conventional
assumptions.
-Bill
--
Bill McGonigle, Owner
BFC Computing, LLC
http://bfccomputing.com/
Te
at's about double what I usually get out of a cheap 'desktop' SATA
drive with OpenSolaris. Slower than a RAID-Z2 of 10 of them, though.
Still, the power savings could be appreciable.
-Bill
--
Bill McGonigle, Owner
BFC Computing, LLC
http://bfccomputing.com/
Telephone: +1.603
Is it also true that ZFS can't be re-implemented in GPLv2 code because then the
CDDL-based patent protections don't apply?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/m
buted under the terms of the CDDL, as I
read it. From skimming the porting paper, it looks like the BSD port
uses the CDDL code directly and so doesn't have to worry about this.
I assume Mac OS X does too?
I'm sure this has been hashed before, but my search keywords are
apparently
reasons).
Well, yeah, the bootloader ought to be as minimal as possible, that
just makes sense, any business cases aside. I was pleasantly
surprised to boot up the latest OpenSolaris OS Live CD and see GRUB,
though. :)
-Bill
-
Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.44
hey couldn't
figure out how to take back a try-out server). Having ZFS as a de-
facto standard lifts all boats, IMHO.
-Bill
-
Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC Home: 603.448.1668
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: 603.252.26
bial core people were on
board the other 3's code would get re-done. Unless it were e.g.,
Ingo, Alan, Linus.
In my dream world Jonathan dispatched Jeff to talk to Linus and
broach, "we'll do it if you do it". :) If so we can mark the date on
the calendar when digital cameras
to figure something out
sooner or later. It's worth remembering that some people are still
waiting for what they consider essential features, so we're really
early in the game here, and if we're still in the Cathedral stage,
the status quo may be the best bet for now.
-Bi
ort.apple.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/RadarWeb.woa/wa/signIn
They'll have ZFS on OSX Server eventually. If you don't want to
create an ADC account I can put one in for you (though less
efficient, obviously).
-Bill
-
Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC
you ultimately determine that
to have been a bad disk or not (once your backup is done!).
-Bill
-
Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC Home: 603.448.1668
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: 603.252.2606
http://www.bfccomputing.com/Page: 603
cache - is it so they can front a really massive
pool of disks that would exhaust market-available maximum main memory
sizes?
-Bill
-
Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC Home: 603.448.1668
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: 603.252.2606
http://
ce trade-off.
Ooh, neat; I hadn't considered that. Cool, thanks. :)
-Bill
-
Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC Home: 603.448.1668
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: 603.252.2606
http://www.bfccomputing.com/Page: 603.442.1833
Blog: http:
olaris driver
to find its holes, in a ZFS context? On one hand I'd guess it
shouldn't be too hard to simulate different kinds of loads, but on
the other hand, if that were easy, the drivers' authors would have
done that before unleashing buggy code on the masses.
Thanks,
-Bill
2014 might be tricky, if nobody's written a ZFS
stream version filter by then.
I just ask these questions to distinguish what's easy in practice vs.
theory.
I'm curious - is the current stream format tagged with a version number?
-Bill
-
Bill McGonigle, Owner Wo
cfgadm' gives you a good list. You're about an hour behind
me on the learning curve (building a Nexenta box here - ZFS found a
problem disk that was causing troubles previously - sweet!).
-Bill
-
Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC
::dsk/c1t0d0disk connectedconfigured ok
sata0/1::dsk/c1t1d0disk connectedconfigured ok
--snip---
-Bill
-
Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC Home: 603.448.1668
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: 603.252.2606
f the early USB2.0 chips).
Just food for thought - there's a lot to go wrong before ZFS sees it
and USB gear isn't always well-made.
-Bill
-
Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC Home: 603.448.1668
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, and I don't know that there's a way to do that with
Seagate's. The WD Velociraptors look really nice for ZFS cache
drives, but it looks like that might be a bit not-quite-ready at this
point (failures appear to hurt quite a bit), so I'll save two slots
for a pair down t
Even ZFS is helpless
against small-odds events, though - sooner or later somebody will
have 3 drives of their raidz2 fail over the same night.
-Bill
-
Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC Home: 603.448.1668
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> create an ADC account I can put one in for you (though less
>> efficient, obviously).
>
> Feel free to do so on my behalf. :-)
Better late then never... this is now bug #5989285 (not that this
will help most people; they're not open).
-Bill
-
Bill M
On Jun 5, 2008, at 17:03, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> Better late then never... this is now bug #5989285 (not that this
> will help most people; they're not open).
Apple say:
After further investigation it has been determined that this is
a known issue, which is currently being i
On May 21, 2008, at 13:14, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> They'll have ZFS on OSX Server eventually.
Replying to myself again... :P
It looks like 'eventually' is next year:
http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/snowleopard/
"ZFS
For business-critical server deployments,
23 matches
Mail list logo
