Re: [zfs-discuss] configuration

2011-01-18 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Trusty Twelve > > Hello, I'm going to build home server. System is deployed on 8 GB USB flash > drive. I have two identical 2 TB HDD and 250 GB one. Could you please > recommend me ZFS configur

Re: [zfs-discuss] configuration

2011-01-18 Thread Brandon High
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Piotr Tarnowski wrote: > You can also make 250 GB slices (partitions) and create RAIDZ 3x250GB and > mirror 2x1750GB (one or more). This configuration doesn't make a lot of sense for redundancy, since it doesn't provide any. It will have poor performance caused b

[zfs-discuss] configuration

2011-01-18 Thread Trusty Twelve
Hello, I'm going to build home server. System is deployed on 8 GB USB flash drive. I have two identical 2 TB HDD and 250 GB one. Could you please recommend me ZFS configuration for the set of my hard drives? 1) pool1: mirror 2tb x 2 pool2: 250 gb (or maybe add this drive to pool1???) 2) pool1: mi

Re: [zfs-discuss] configuration

2011-01-18 Thread Piotr Tarnowski
You can also make 250 GB slices (partitions) and create RAIDZ 3x250GB and mirror 2x1750GB (one or more). Mirror has better performance for write operations, Raidz shoud be faster for read. Regards -- Piotr Tarnowski /DrFugazi/ http://www.drfugazi.eu.org/ -- This message posted from opensolari

Re: [zfs-discuss] configuration

2011-01-18 Thread Gal Buki
With two drives it makes more sense to use a mirror then raidz configuration. You will have the same amount of space and mirroring gives you more performance, afaik. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@op

Re: [zfs-discuss] Configuration questions for Home File Server (CPU cores, dedup, checksum)?

2010-09-13 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
On Tue, September 7, 2010 15:58, Craig Stevenson wrote: > 3. Should I consider using dedup if my server has only 8Gb of RAM? Or, > will that not be enough to hold the DDT? In which case, should I add > L2ARC / ZIL or am I better to just skip using dedup on a home file server? I would not cons

Re: [zfs-discuss] Configuration questions for Home File Server (CPU cores, dedup, checksum)?

2010-09-08 Thread Darren J Moffat
On 08/09/2010 00:41, Scott Meilicke wrote: Craig, 3. I do not think you will get much dedupe on video, music and photos. I would not bother. If you really wanted to know at some later stage, you could create a new file system, enable dedupe, and copy your data (or a subset) into it just to se

Re: [zfs-discuss] Configuration questions for Home File Server (CPU cores, dedup, checksum)?

2010-09-08 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
> 3. Should I consider using dedup if my server has only 8Gb of RAM? Or, > will that not be enough to hold the DDT? In which case, should I add > L2ARC / ZIL or am I better to just skip using dedup on a home file > server? As Cindy said, skip dedup for now. It's not stable (enough). Try to destroy

Re: [zfs-discuss] Configuration questions for Home File Server (CPU cores, dedup, checksum)?

2010-09-07 Thread Russ Price
On 09/07/2010 05:58 PM, Eric D. Mudama wrote: How are you measuring using 60% across all four cores? I kicked off a scrub just to see, and we're scrubbing at 200MB/s (2 vdevs) and the CPU is 94% idle, 6% kernel, 0% IOWAIT. zpool-tank is using 3.2% CPU as shown by 'ps aux | grep tank' Whoops..

Re: [zfs-discuss] Configuration questions for Home File Server (CPU cores, dedup, checksum)?

2010-09-07 Thread Scott Meilicke
Craig, 3. I do not think you will get much dedupe on video, music and photos. I would not bother. If you really wanted to know at some later stage, you could create a new file system, enable dedupe, and copy your data (or a subset) into it just to see. In my experience there is a significant CP

Re: [zfs-discuss] Configuration questions for Home File Server (CPU cores, dedup, checksum)?

2010-09-07 Thread Eric D. Mudama
On Tue, Sep 7 at 17:13, Russ Price wrote: On 09/07/2010 03:58 PM, Craig Stevenson wrote: I am working on a home file server. After reading a wide range of blogs and forums, I have a few questions that are still not clear to me 1. Is there a benefit in having quad core CPU (e.g. Athlon II

Re: [zfs-discuss] Configuration questions for Home File Server (CPU cores, dedup, checksum)?

2010-09-07 Thread Russ Price
On 09/07/2010 03:58 PM, Craig Stevenson wrote: I am working on a home file server. After reading a wide range of blogs and forums, I have a few questions that are still not clear to me 1. Is there a benefit in having quad core CPU (e.g. Athlon II X4 vs X2)? All of the web blogs seem to s

Re: [zfs-discuss] Configuration questions for Home File Server (CPU cores, dedup, checksum)?

2010-09-07 Thread Cindy Swearingen
Craig, I'm sure the other home file server users will comment on your gear and any possible benefit of a L2ARC or separate log device... Use the default checksum which is fletcher4, I fixed the tuning guide reference, skip dedup for now. Keep things as simple as possible. Thanks, Cindy On 0

[zfs-discuss] Configuration questions for Home File Server (CPU cores, dedup, checksum)?

2010-09-07 Thread Craig Stevenson
I am working on a home file server. After reading a wide range of blogs and forums, I have a few questions that are still not clear to me 1. Is there a benefit in having quad core CPU (e.g. Athlon II X4 vs X2)? All of the web blogs seem to suggest using lower-wattage dual core CPUs. But;