8 hot swap bays is not too much. The rest looks like a cake walk for OSol. But
with this HW you can't go for 2009.06 anyhow, as ICH-10 won't be recognized. (I
tried this on x58)
I have a 2U enclosure as well (12-bay), but I'd opt for at least 3U next time,
as there are too many restrictions
hello
if you want to compair it against openfiler, i would suggest not to use
opensolaris itself (too much desktop stuff) but a more server like opensolaris
distribution like eon (minimal opensolaris + napp-it) or nexentastor community
edition (free version of their commercial storage server
I would be really interested how you got past this
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=11371
which I was so badly bitten by that I considered
giving up on OpenSolaris.
I don't get random hangs in normal use; so I haven't
done anything to get
past this.
I DO get hangs
On 15/04/10 06:29 PM, Günther wrote:
hello
if you want to compair it against openfiler, i would suggest
not to use opensolaris itself (too much desktop stuff) but a
more server like opensolaris distribution like eon (minimal
opensolaris + napp-it) or nexentastor community edition (free
gea wrote:
if you want to compair it against openfiler, i would suggest
not to use opensolaris itself (too much desktop stuff) but a
more server like opensolaris distribution like eon (minimal
opensolaris + napp-it) or nexentastor community edition (free
version of their commercial
Thanks for the tips,
I tried EON, but it is too minimalistic, I plan to use this server for other
(monitoring server and etc.)
Nexenta is a strange hybrid, and use the not commercial version, without its
ability, i don't know...
A napp-it i'll try for sure
--
This message posted from
hello dr245
free nexentastor community edition = commercial edition without support,
without additions like high availability or vmware/ xen management
and limited to 12 tb
nexenta (core) is just the same system (opensolaris b134+ kernel with unix tools
and handling, software will be the same
jcm == James C McPherson james.mcpher...@oracle.com writes:
ga == Günther Alka a...@hfg-gmuend.de writes:
jcm I am amazed that you believe OpenSolaris binary distro has too
jcm much desktop stuff. Most people I have come across are firmly
jcm of the belief that it does not have enough.
free nexentastor community edition = commercial edition without support,
You are opened my eyes :)
start to download, tomorrow will look
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Is it? I don't really understand the nexenta license, which is why I
don't bother with it.
In the simplest terms,
NCP (nexenta.org) = Free as in speech/beer
NexentaStor Community Edition (nexentastor.org) = Free as in beer
- NCP underneath + closed WebGUI + FOSS plugins
NexentaStor
Which build is the most stable, mainly for NAS?
I plann NAS zfs + CIFS,iSCSI
Thanks
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
safe to say: 2009.06 (b111) is unusable for the purpose, ans CIFS is dead in
this build.
I am using B133, but I am not sure if this is best choice. I'd like to hear
from others as well.
-Tonmaus
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
On Wed, April 14, 2010 08:52, Tonmaus wrote:
safe to say: 2009.06 (b111) is unusable for the purpose, ans CIFS is dead
in this build.
That's strange; I run it every day (my home Windows My Documents folder
and all my photos are on 2009.06).
-bash-3.2$ cat /etc/release
On Wed, April 14, 2010 11:51, Tonmaus wrote:
On Wed, April 14, 2010 08:52, Tonmaus wrote:
safe to say: 2009.06 (b111) is unusable for the
purpose, ans CIFS is dead
in this build.
That's strange; I run it every day (my home Windows
My Documents folder
and all my photos are on 2009.06).
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Dmitry dr...@hotbox.ru wrote:
Which build is the most stable, mainly for NAS?
I plann NAS zfs + CIFS,iSCSI
I'm using b133. My current box was installed with 118, upgraded to
128a, then 133.
I'm avoiding b134 due to changes in the CIFS service that affect ACLs.
dd == David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net writes:
dd Is it possible to switch to b132 now, for example?
yeah, this is not so bad. I know of two approaches:
* genunix.org assembles livecd's of each bnnn tag. You can burn
one, unplug from the internet, install it. It is nice to have a
On Wed, April 14, 2010 15:28, Miles Nordin wrote:
dd == David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net writes:
dd Is it possible to switch to b132 now, for example?
yeah, this is not so bad. I know of two approaches:
Thanks, I've filed and flagged this for reference.
--
David Dyer-Bennet,
On Wed, Apr 14 at 13:16, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
I don't get random hangs in normal use; so I haven't done anything to get
past this.
Interesting. Win7-64 clients were locking up our 2009.06 server
within seconds while performing common operations like searching and
copying large directory
On 04/15/10 06:16 AM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
Because 132 was the most current last time I paid much attention :-). As
I say, I'm currently holding out for 2010.$Spring, but knowing how to get
to a particular build via package would be potentially interesting for the
future still.
I hope
On 14-Apr-10 22:44, Ian Collins wrote:
On 04/15/10 06:16 AM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
Because 132 was the most current last time I paid much attention :-). As
I say, I'm currently holding out for 2010.$Spring, but knowing how to get
to a particular build via package would be potentially
David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
On 14-Apr-10 22:44, Ian Collins wrote:
Hint: the southern hemisphere does exist!
I've even been there.
But the month/season relationship is too deeply built into too many
things I follow (like the Christmas books come out of the publisher's
fall list; for that
Yesterday I received a victim.
SuperServer 5026T-3RF 19 2U, Intel X58, 1xCPU LGA1366 8xSAS/SATA hot-swap
drive bays, 8 ports SAS LSI 1068E, 6 ports SATA-II Intel ICH10R, 2xGigabit
Ethernet
and i have 2 ways Openfiler vs Opensolaris :)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
22 matches
Mail list logo
