Jeff Thompson wrote: > Good points about the difference between OWL DL and OWL Full. > So if you only want to export OWL DL, what would you do with a page like > the President or Dog or Wine pages on Wikipedia, which are pages about a > class.
Place articles about classes in the Category namespace. Again, this is only for the purpose of conforming with OWL DL. With this in mind: the difference between OWL DL and OWL Full is whether or not you respect the usage restrictions placed on you by the former; the syntax of the two sublanguages is the same. I'd be fine with saying that if you want to conform to OWL DL, use the special Class property to establish all is-a relations (and be sure to place articles about classes in the Category namespace; otherwise, the Class property won't be able to target them). If you don't care about OWL DL conformance, use a pair of special properties (say, "Subclass of" and "Member of") that explicitly provide rdfs:subClassOf and rdf:type functionality, respectively (and which point to the main namespace by default). Finally, allow wiki administrators to customize the site based on whether or not they care about OWL DL conformance by disabling the latter two special properties. Better yet, reverse this and require them to explicitly enable violations of OWL DL if they don't care about OWL DL compatibility. -- Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Semediawiki-devel mailing list Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
