Hi!
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Yaron Koren <ya...@wikiworks.com> wrote:
> Hi Yury,
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Yury Katkov <katkov.ju...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Yaron!
>>
>> I think that for SiteSettings this patch could make sense although I'm
>> strongly against such interdependencies between extensions (after trying to
>> contribute to PageSchemas)
>>
>
> Could you expand on that?
>
It's just a lot harder to contribute the code when there is such a
dependency. In order to contribute the code I have to make changes not in
one extension but in two or three. This can create inconsistency, like the
one we can see now in Page Schemas: there are some features that are
presented in PS but the code in SF still doesn't have support for them,
because the changes haven't been accepted.
I understand that you've had in mind the following scenario: there is Page
Schemas and everyone can register their own extension in it. It didn't work
well in the Page Schemas case but it can in principle work in case of Site
Settings since it's not SMW-specific.
>
>
>>
>> Is AdminLinks mentioned in SMW? That's really strange and surprising - I
>> thought it's just a header button and the predefined wikipage for the
>> content (well, maybe it can also check, which extensions are installed).
>>
>
> Every extension-related link in Special:AdminLinks is added by that
> extension.
>
>
> -Yaron
>
> --
> WikiWorks · MediaWiki Consulting · http://wikiworks.com
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
_______________________________________________
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
