Pe 11.04.2012 18:48, echo a scris:
Hi Manolo
Very glad to see your reply. The reason why I want to choose the gwt-platform
was that it is more smoothly to update from current Hupa's state(gwt-presenter).
However, I like the native one rather than gwtp since it will import the other
resources. What I really want to do is to replace the MVP by gwt itself. I was
just afraid whether I can complete the proposal before the deadline of GSoC, so
I asked for you advices. If possible, I want to use the core mvp in gwt to
realize it. Over these days, I have been researching the Hupa project and GWT
technology and later on I want to show you something I am changing.
To the new features, I would like to implement as many features, that a current
email client should have, as possible not only during the GSoC period, but also
after that. And I am also keeping my eyes open on the Hupa's JIRA, where some
wonderful ideas come out gradually. Sure I will give my deeper discription after
my researching. I don't think it will be late.
Thanks a lot :)
Wish you a happy
Hi Echo
I've been reading your application and it looks right to me.
One thing I see is that you have selected gwt-platform instead of the
core mvp in gwt but you don't say any reason about why you prefer the
first option.
Also I'd like a deeper description of how you pretend to face new
features, I mean components, persistence, customization etc.
Cheers
- Manolo
--
cheers,
echo
Hello Echo,
Sound good. I'm not familiar with GWT and I would like to know more.
Good luck with your research and send us the findings.
Cheers.
--
Ioan Eugen Stan
http://ieugen.blogspot.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
