> Actually this is the main reason I don't tend to participate very > much on this list anymore. It has turned out to be one of those > places where you can't escape the fruitless, endless arguments over > whose perspective or opinion is correct.
I've found the discussions on the list getting better recently because they've been more than WS-* rah rah. Kind of ironic. I guess we're at other ends of the spectrum. In any case, Eric, you made a claim about simplicity and message headers, I suppose in WS-* vs. HTTP. I asked for a demonstration of this comparison. You asked me to propose a scenario... I did so about a week back I guess. There are a number of instances in that scenario where one might apply some HTTP, XMPP, JMS, WS-*, or other technology to. I would really appreciate some kind of a discussion about, yes, technology, rather than Zachman or SOA-or-be-doomed. If there is something in that scenario you can use to illustrate the simplicity or whatever of WS-* something then perhaps a comparison could be made to how HTTP, XMPP, or something non-WS-* could be applied to the same situation. You made a claim... let's dig in and see if it is beyond fruitless to explore it. -Patrick ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the new email design. http://us.click.yahoo.com/TISQkA/hOaOAA/yQLSAA/NhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
