On Jun 27, 2006, at 5:15 PM, Eric Newcomer wrote: > > This kind of brings up the "bottom up" vs "top down" approach > debate I think, at least if I understand you correctly. >
Hi Eric - Partially, yes. > > I would think the top-down, or WSDL first, or contract first > approach is preferable but we often encounter developers who prefer > the bottom up approach. > > Maybe there's room or need for both? > I agree that contract-first is preferable to code-first. What was referring to, though, was something different: I believe a "service" is something that is semantically different from a distributed objects's interface, not just a different messaging protocol. That's why I'm deeply suspicious of any toolkit that "just" maps CORBA, DCOM or RMI to SOAP ... Stefan > > Eric > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Stefan Tilkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 7:44:33 AM > Subject: Re: [service-orientated-architecture] SOA and ESBs > > On Jun 27, 2006, at 1:08 PM, Stefan Tilkov wrote: > > > Anything that promises to turn local or remote objects or > > component interfaces is most likely going to introduce more trouble > > than it's worth. > > That was supposed to be "Anything that promises to turn local or > remote objects or component interfaces *into 'services' > automatically* is most likely going to introduce more trouble than > it's worth." > > Stefan > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email. http://us.click.yahoo.com/2pRQfA/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/NhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
