Re: [service-orientated-architecture] Re: SOA and ESBs

[Anne Thomas Manes]

JMS isn't much use if you're building applications in C#, VB, COBOL, Perl, PHP, Python, Ruby, _javascript_, etc.

Language dependency is an anathma to SOA.

Anne

On 6/28/06, patrickdlogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> the JMS requirement was only there because the initial proponents
> happened to be JMS vendors.

There are reasons for this that should be considered.

I know it is an API and not a priori "interoperable" (in all the
dimensions of that term), but many implementations are interoperable
in various ways. And it is fairly simple yet expressive.

I would suggest there are a number of vendors of JMS due to its
simplicity (it can be implemented and used without a ton of effort)
and expressiveness (it can be used successfully, widely). For all of
these reasons it seems something like JMS should be the core of an
ESB.

-Patrick

__._,_.___

SPONSORED LINKS

Computer software	Computer aided design software	Computer job
Soa	Service-oriented architecture

---

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

•  Visit your group "service-orientated-architecture" on the web.
   
•  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
•  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---

__,_._,___