+1. -Rob
--- In [email protected], JP Morgenthal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My vote is it's meaningless! > > A more correct phrase would have been it has been designed using SOA, > but there is no such thing as being SOA compliant. > __________________________________ > JP Morgenthal > President & CEO > Avorcor, Inc. > 46440 Benedict Drive > Suite 103 > Sterling, VA 20164 > (703) 649-0829 x 101: Office > (703) 554-5301 : Cell > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________ > > Confidential: The information in this e-mail message (including any > attachments) is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named > above and as such is privileged and confidential. If you are not an > intended recipient of this message or an agent responsible for > delivering it to the intended recipient(s), be hereby notified that > you have received this message in error. Any review, dissemination, > distribution, printing or copying of this message is strictly > prohibited. If you believe you have received this message in error, > please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this > message from your system(s). > > > > > On Jun 27, 2007, at 11:30 AM, Teresa Jones wrote: > > > I'm currently looking at a CRM product that the vendor claims is > > 'SOA-compliant' yet it is also claimed to be an n-tier architecture. A > > quick search on the concept of SOA-compliance brought up this > > article:- > > http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/eai/engineering/archives/my-soa- > > compliant-toaster-and-cell-phone-7362 > > which was quite fun! > > I suspect that the CRM vendor concerned actually means that you can > > integrate with it using web services.... > > Question for the group - can an application be regarded as > > SOA-compliant? Or is that rather a meaningless phrase? > > thanks > > Teresa > > > > > > >
