We at IONA would not claim "SOA compliance" since such a thing doesn't exist 
and probably can't or at least shouldn't.

SOA is a style of design, or an approach to IT.  It's not something with which 
any particular product can be compliant since any number of technologies can be 
(and have been) successfully used to imlpement an SOA.  That means it's how you 
use the product, not the product or technology itself, that needs to be SOA 
compliant.

Eric

----- Original Message ----
From: Steve Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 6:11:18 AM
Subject: Re: [service-orientated-architecture] SOA-compliant

And here in lies the problem....

I've done this on several occasions with product teams who make the valid point

"Yes we know that it isn't, but the analysts are saying things must be SOA and 
customers are looking for SOA, so we say we have SOA and people buy it" 

No-one ever advertises "Pretty much like our old product, we've just put three 
more blades on it to see if you will buy the same stuff again" or "gets clothes 
as white as everyone elses product" and certainly not "Its a creme for your 
face, it might help it might not, we just use phrases like fructose and aqua so 
you won't realise its just sugar and water". 

That said I'd argue that it should be possible to have a standard of both 
architectureal and technical compliance to SOA principles, rather than the 
current raft which is just right-click expose web service on the existing code 
base. 

Steve



On 27/06/07, JP Morgenthal <morgenthaljp@ avorcor.com> wrote:
Now that we're all in agreement, who will carry the message back to the 
pathetic marketing staffs within these vendors?


:-)

____________ _________ _________ ____

JP Morgenthal
President & CEO
Avorcor, Inc.
46440 Benedict Drive
Suite 103
Sterling, VA 20164
(703) 649-0829 x 101: Office 
(703) 554-5301 : Cell
morgenthaljp@ avorcor.com
____________ _________ _________ ____ 


Confidential: The information in this e-mail message (including any 
attachments) is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and 
as such is privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient of 
this message or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
recipient(s) , be hereby notified that you have received this message in error. 
Any review, dissemination, distribution, printing or copying of this message is 
strictly prohibited. If you believe you have received this message in error, 
please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message 
from your system(s). 
 




On Jun 27, 2007, at 1:04 PM, Mark D. Carlson wrote:




For this term to have meaning one would have to ask "Compliant according to 
what defined standard or specification? ".  If I assert that a Web Service is 
compliant with WS-I Basic Profile 1.0, that assertion can be tested either 
manually by reviewing its characteristics against the published rules or in an 
automated fashion using one or more tools.  In short, my compliance claim could 
be verified.  
  

This vendor's claim of "SOA compliance" can neither be proved nor disproved in 
absence of some finite set of compliance tests or at least a widely agreed upon 
specific definition.  Their claim is like claiming "object orientation 
compliant" or "distributed computing compliant" or "client server compliant".  
It is a marketing construct and useless for any real evaluation of their 
product. 
Thanks,
Mark
 




From: service-orientated- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ 
mailto:service-orientated-architecture@ yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Teresa 
Jones
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 9:30 AM 
To: service-orientated-architecture@ yahoogroups.com
Subject: [service-orientated -architecture] SOA-compliant
 

I'm currently looking at a CRM product that the vendor claims is 
'SOA-compliant' yet it is also claimed to be an n-tier architecture. A
quick search on the concept of SOA-compliance brought up this article:-
http://blogs.ittoolbox. com/eai/engineering/archives/my-soa-compliant 
-toaster-and-cell- phone-7362
which was quite fun!
I suspect that the CRM vendor concerned actually means that you can
integrate with it using web services....
Question for the group - can an application be regarded as 
SOA-compliant? Or is that rather a meaningless phrase?
thanks
Teresa 









       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, 
photos & more. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC

Reply via email to