+1. To just say that we should have more governance I think isn't the answer - it the lack of "proper" governance. I don't think to use IT to measure people's efficiencies and give reward and punishment based on that data is the right approach.
I think it should be more about how IT can be used to have a better understanding of the current IT situation so that it can be used more efficiently. Example: Use registry/repository to manage services, interfaces, and beans so others can more easily use them. I think people would really use them if it can actually benefit them. I know that many developers work late into the night every day, and I think they'll use any tools that would really benefit them. H.Ozawa --- In [email protected], "Alexander Johannesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Heh, and I thought the thread was about how the current IT governance > models work out is killing SOA, not a lack of any such. I'd agree > completely with the former, but not really the latter, and my > reasoning comes from seeing to much red tape in current practice where > there should be pragmatism instead. > > > Alexander > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- > Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic Maps > ------------------------------------------ http://shelter.nu/blog/ -------- >
