Stephen Hahn wrote: > I think I've corrected or responded to all points from the previous > round--thanks to David and Dermot--but additional input is always > welcomed. > >
I understand why you did it, but I think the handling of ginstall and its manpage is a little unusual: you have linked manpages: /usr/share/man/man1/ginstall.1 -> /usr/gnu/share/man/man1/install.1 but don't have links for the actual command, ie: /usr/gnu/bin/ginstall -> /usr/bin/install Could that be confusing? Also, you put the "real" file in /usr/gnu/share/man/man and the symlink in /usr/share/man/man1 - that's the opposite of what I've done previously. Maybe the solution should be to rename "install.1" to "ginstall.1" and only put it /usr/share/man/man1? - Dermot
