* Dermot.McCluskey at Sun.COM <Dermot.McCluskey at Sun.COM> [2007-05-18 10:39]: > Stephen Hahn wrote: > > > I think I've corrected or responded to all points from the previous > > round--thanks to David and Dermot--but additional input is always > > welcomed. > > > > > > I understand why you did it, but I think the handling of ginstall > and its manpage is a little unusual: you have linked manpages: > /usr/share/man/man1/ginstall.1 -> /usr/gnu/share/man/man1/install.1 > but don't have links for the actual command, ie: > /usr/gnu/bin/ginstall -> /usr/bin/install > > Could that be confusing? It could be. The reason we can't take /usr/bin/install is that the default command variant is /usr/sbin/install, which the UCB variant at /usr/ucb/install. > Also, you put the "real" file in /usr/gnu/share/man/man > and the symlink in /usr/share/man/man1 - that's the > opposite of what I've done previously. > > Maybe the solution should be to rename "install.1" > to "ginstall.1" and only put it /usr/share/man/man1?
I am fine with installing under only the ginstall location. - Stephen -- sch at sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
