Bharath,

Bharath wrote:
> Please see comments inline.
> 
> Paul Cunningham wrote:
>>
>> This mainly looks good to me, see below for a few comments ...
>>

>> Bharath Kumar wrote:
>>>
>>> Requesting a code review for Wiseman.
>>>
>>> Wiseman - is an implementation of the WS-Management specification for 
>>> the Java SE platform.
>>>
>>> Webrev:  http://cr.opensolaris.org/~bkumarm/wiseman/
>>>
>>> Please note that I am using a local copy of saaj (LSARC/2009/236)  
>>> and jaxb (LSARC/2009/237) jars for now, will point to the proto area 
>>> once they are integrated in to the sfw gate. Wiseman will not be 
>>> integrated till saaj and jaxb are integrated into sfw gate.
>>>
>>> The bugster subcategory creation for wiseman is in progress. Will 
>>> create placeholder bug once the subcat is created.
>>
>> 1. usr/src/lib/wiseman/*.jar
>>    Why are these included in the webrev ?
>>
> As mentioned above, these jars are local copy of saaj and jaxb used for 
> now only. However they will be removed and I will be using the saaj 
> (LSARC/2009/236)  and jaxb (LSARC/2009/237) that get integrated into sfw.
> wiseman will not be integrated till saaj and jaxb are integrated.

I personally would prefer that they weren't in the webrev (as they don't 
need to be)

>> 2. usr/src/lib/wiseman/METADATA
>>    Why doesn't the 'SRC:' link point to the downloaded
>>    source tarball?
>>
> Since there is no source tarball released, I have checked out the 
> sources from cvs using the release tag and created the tarball.

okay if there really in no source-tarball

but don't forget to update the METADATA so that it conforms to Norm's 
heads-up as in http://wikis.sun.com/display/SFWNotes/METADATA

>> 3. usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWwisemanr/copyright
>>     & usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWwisemanu/copyright
>>    Maybe you should change this a manually wrap all the
>>    looooong lines.
>
>> 4. usr/src/lib/wiseman/*.? man pages
>>    Maybe these should all refer to 'wiseman' on the lines ...
>>    "Source for xxxx is available on http://opensolaris.org.";
>>
>>
> I will do the changes and update the webrev

have you updated the webrev yet ?

paul

Reply via email to