On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:55:08AM -0800, Mike.Sullivan at sun.com wrote:
> >Would anyone have any heartburn over defining a package build variable to
> >use in prototype_com so I don't have to go change a bunch of "x.y.z" to
> >"a.b.c" each time I upgrade the package? That should make reviewing the
> >changes a lot easier in future upgrades.
>
> Not sure - it probably depends on whether protocmp chokes on it or not,
> I don't know if it would handle that.
Damn, you're right. That's
6507777 protocmp could understand !param=value construct in prototype files
which I should just have fixed once I wrote the code to fix it.
> However you could generate the prototype* files from .tmpl files like
> a few other things do (such as gcc) and that would be fine. gcc does it
> mostly to try to avoid putbacks for uname changes but you could do
> this too.
Yeah, that'd work, too.
Danek
