Nils Goroll wrote: ... cut ... >> But main reason is to be sync with S10 >> packages. It is why I have been thinking to postpone this to the 8.4 >> integration. We cannot change it for S10. Only what I can do is >> correctly set --syconfigdir to /etc. > > OK. Though I don't understand why a patch can't introduce a package or what > else > the specific issues with s10 are, I'll > > - remove the additional package
personally I think you should keep this new 'root' package as Solaris Nevada and s10 are two very different beasts now, and it's therefore better to correct wrong stuff rather than propagate it. Paul -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Cunningham Software Engineer Tadpole Business Unit
