Zdenek Kotala wrote: > Paul Cunningham wrote: >> Nils Goroll wrote: >> ... cut ... >>>> But main reason is to be sync with S10 packages. It is why I have >>>> been thinking to postpone this to the 8.4 integration. We cannot >>>> change it for S10. Only what I can do is correctly set --syconfigdir >>>> to /etc. >>> >>> OK. Though I don't understand why a patch can't introduce a package >>> or what else the specific issues with s10 are, I'll >>> >>> - remove the additional package >> >> personally I think you should keep this new 'root' package as Solaris >> Nevada and s10 are two very different beasts now, and it's therefore >> better to correct wrong stuff rather than propagate it. > > Paul, do not forget that Opensolaris 2008.5 is released. Which also adds > complexity to maintain more Solaris releases. I agree wrong stuff should > be fixed but in this case the "wrong" is really small and fix could add > more problems.
but "small wrongs" grow into "big wrongs" (just like trees) - but I've had my say :-) Paul -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Cunningham Software Engineer
