On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 15:54 +0530, Spoorthy H.S wrote:
> Hi Mark, 
> 
> After review of the ARC one pager, I have done modifications. So, you
> can have a look at this new webrev
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~spoorthy/ws_cryptcbc1/


usr/src/Targetdirs:1465
No need to create the /usr/demo/crypt-cbc/t directory

METDATA:9
You'll need to create a bugster category and update this line.

usr/src/lib/perl_crypt_cbc/Makefile.sfw:32
Remove this line. CONFIGURE_OPTIONS isn't used

usr/src/lib/perl_crypt_cbc/Makefile.sfw:35,38
Remove the brackets. No need for a sub-shell here.

usr/src/lib/perl_crypt_cbc/Makefile.sfw:46
Remove this line - it looks like an autoconf variable.

usr/src/lib/perl_crypt_cbc/Makefile.sfw:45,50
Remove the brackets. No need for a sub-shell here.

usr/src/lib/perl_crypt_cbc/Makefile.sfw:48
Remove this line. make isn't used here.

usr/src/lib/perl_crypt_cbc/Makefile.sfw:52-54
I think you can remove this rule entirely. The tarball will be unpacked
via rules from the included makefiles. Change the line 44 to read:
$(VER)/Makefile.PL: $(VER)/$(SFW_STAMP_UNPACKED)

usr/src/lib/perl_crypt_cbc/install-sfw:44
Is this the top-level README from the tarball? If so I don't think it
should be delivered into /usr/demo.

usr/src/lib/perl_crypt_cbc/install-sfw:42
Makefile.PL shouldn't be delivered to /usr/demo

usr/src/lib/perl_crypt_cbc/install-sfw:34
I don't see the need for the "eg" directory in /usr/demo. I think the
example perl scripts can go straight into Crypt CBC dir in /usr/demo.

usr/src/lib/perl_crypt_cbc/install-sfw:36
You set MANSCRIPT but it is never used. Where is the man page to be
installed?

usr/src/lib/perl_crypt_cbc/install-sfw:46-48
These perl scripts should be installed using the 'P' type not 'N'.

usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWperl-crypt-cbc/depend:52,53
This makes the package dependent on Perl 5.10 but you are delivering for
5.8

usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWperl-crypt-cbc/pkginfo.tmpl:52-58
These commented-out lines should be removed.

usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWperl-crypt-cbc/prototype_com:63,64
These lines should probably be removed.


Thanks,

-M

Reply via email to