Yep, that's correct!
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> wrote: > So, just to put the nail into this coffin, this is the exhaustive list > developers from the pre-Incubator project: > >> Peter Ledbrook >> Jeremy Haile >> Allan Ditzel >> Tim Veil >> Les Hazlewood > > Am I correct? > > Regards, > Alan > > > On Dec 16, 2009, at 7:26 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: > >> Yep, it did. Just for clarity's sake: every contributor on the old >> JSecurity project came over as a committer to Apache and each also >> sent the re-licensing agreement/affirmation at that time. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Les >> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> So, back in July Craig sent out a set of emails from committers in the >>> project stating that re-licensing for ASF. What I am not sure of is that >>> this covers *all* the original authors from the JSecurity project before >>> it >>> arrived at the Incubator. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Alan >>> >>> On Dec 8, 2009, at 6:42 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>> >>>> Craig, can you please just confirm this so we have a clear record of it? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Les >>>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> If Craig has confirmed that all the original authors from JSecurity >>>>> have >>>>> filed a license agreement then I think we're good. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Alan >>>>> >>>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yep, we're covered. All people who contributed previously to >>>>>> JSecurity became committers to Shiro. Before joining the incubator, >>>>>> we all formally (each) agreed to the transfer. >>>>>> >>>>>> HTH, >>>>>> >>>>>> Les >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I recall that agreements were forwarded by current project members. >>>>>>> I'm >>>>>>> not >>>>>>> certain that we covered all the people who contributed to the >>>>>>> original >>>>>>> project. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To the best of my knowledge this is all finished - Craig helped out >>>>>>>> with it. I forwarded all the formal statements from all previous >>>>>>>> committers that they fully agree and support of transferring all of >>>>>>>> their work to the ASF 2.0 license. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Craig, could you please clarify if there's anything else that needs >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>> done? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Les >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:44 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think most people in the Shiro community would agree that we're >>>>>>>>>> long >>>>>>>>>> overdue for our first release ;) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So, to that end, and unless anyone objects, I'm going to take a >>>>>>>>>> crack >>>>>>>>>> at tagging only what I feel are the most important issues that >>>>>>>>>> absolutely must be in to 1.0. When I'm done with that, I'd like >>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> post to this list again to allow people the opportunity to >>>>>>>>>> speak-up >>>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>>> they see something that they think should be included but I >>>>>>>>>> missed. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm doing this to help us get a little focus on what should >>>>>>>>>> concretely >>>>>>>>>> define our first release, and to get it out as soon as possible >>>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>> now. Just my opinion, but I think it'd be great if we can finish >>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>> the 1.0 issues (if not actually release) by 1 January. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if anyone does not agree with this, otherwise, >>>>>>>>>> I'll >>>>>>>>>> get started as soon as possible organizing the existing issues. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sounds great! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The only thing that's hazy in my mind is the LGPL vetting. I >>>>>>>>> recall >>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>> effort to obtain permission to relicense the code from the original >>>>>>>>> authors >>>>>>>>> but am not sure if it was completed and all the requisite >>>>>>>>> permissions >>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>> properly filed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> > >
