There is one minor thing I forgot to mention: Jeremy's friend created the old JSecurity shield/lock logo for us. He did the logo for us in return for free website hosting on one of our servers. This is payment for services rendered (he payed us by doing the logo work, the services rendered were the website hosting), so I don't think that we need a CLA/sign-off from him.
As I understand it, the shield/lock logo is our intellectual property due to this agreement and we don't need to involve him. IANAL, but I think we're ok. - Les On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> wrote: > Yep, it did. Just for clarity's sake: every contributor on the old > JSecurity project came over as a committer to Apache and each also > sent the re-licensing agreement/affirmation at that time. > > Cheers, > > Les > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> > wrote: >> So, back in July Craig sent out a set of emails from committers in the >> project stating that re-licensing for ASF. What I am not sure of is that >> this covers *all* the original authors from the JSecurity project before it >> arrived at the Incubator. >> >> >> Regards, >> Alan >> >> On Dec 8, 2009, at 6:42 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >> >>> Craig, can you please just confirm this so we have a clear record of it? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Les >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> If Craig has confirmed that all the original authors from JSecurity have >>>> filed a license agreement then I think we're good. >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Alan >>>> >>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yep, we're covered. All people who contributed previously to >>>>> JSecurity became committers to Shiro. Before joining the incubator, >>>>> we all formally (each) agreed to the transfer. >>>>> >>>>> HTH, >>>>> >>>>> Les >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I recall that agreements were forwarded by current project members. >>>>>> I'm >>>>>> not >>>>>> certain that we covered all the people who contributed to the original >>>>>> project. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Alan >>>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> To the best of my knowledge this is all finished - Craig helped out >>>>>>> with it. I forwarded all the formal statements from all previous >>>>>>> committers that they fully agree and support of transferring all of >>>>>>> their work to the ASF 2.0 license. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Craig, could you please clarify if there's anything else that needs to >>>>>>> be >>>>>>> done? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Les >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:44 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think most people in the Shiro community would agree that we're >>>>>>>>> long >>>>>>>>> overdue for our first release ;) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So, to that end, and unless anyone objects, I'm going to take a >>>>>>>>> crack >>>>>>>>> at tagging only what I feel are the most important issues that >>>>>>>>> absolutely must be in to 1.0. When I'm done with that, I'd like to >>>>>>>>> post to this list again to allow people the opportunity to speak-up >>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>> they see something that they think should be included but I missed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm doing this to help us get a little focus on what should >>>>>>>>> concretely >>>>>>>>> define our first release, and to get it out as soon as possible from >>>>>>>>> now. Just my opinion, but I think it'd be great if we can finish >>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>> the 1.0 issues (if not actually release) by 1 January. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please let me know if anyone does not agree with this, otherwise, >>>>>>>>> I'll >>>>>>>>> get started as soon as possible organizing the existing issues. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sounds great! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The only thing that's hazy in my mind is the LGPL vetting. I recall >>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>> effort to obtain permission to relicense the code from the original >>>>>>>> authors >>>>>>>> but am not sure if it was completed and all the requisite permissions >>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>> properly filed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >
