For artwork it can get complicated but only if you received
stipulations on its usage; it doesn't seem that there is any. I think
we're good here.
Regards,
Alan
On Dec 16, 2009, at 7:33 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
There is one minor thing I forgot to mention: Jeremy's friend created
the old JSecurity shield/lock logo for us. He did the logo for us in
return for free website hosting on one of our servers. This is
payment for services rendered (he payed us by doing the logo work, the
services rendered were the website hosting), so I don't think that we
need a CLA/sign-off from him.
As I understand it, the shield/lock logo is our intellectual property
due to this agreement and we don't need to involve him. IANAL, but I
think we're ok.
- Les
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Les Hazlewood
<[email protected]> wrote:
Yep, it did. Just for clarity's sake: every contributor on the old
JSecurity project came over as a committer to Apache and each also
sent the re-licensing agreement/affirmation at that time.
Cheers,
Les
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]
> wrote:
So, back in July Craig sent out a set of emails from committers in
the
project stating that re-licensing for ASF. What I am not sure of
is that
this covers *all* the original authors from the JSecurity project
before it
arrived at the Incubator.
Regards,
Alan
On Dec 8, 2009, at 6:42 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
Craig, can you please just confirm this so we have a clear record
of it?
Thanks,
Les
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]
>
wrote:
If Craig has confirmed that all the original authors from
JSecurity have
filed a license agreement then I think we're good.
Regards,
Alan
On Dec 7, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
Yep, we're covered. All people who contributed previously to
JSecurity became committers to Shiro. Before joining the
incubator,
we all formally (each) agreed to the transfer.
HTH,
Les
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]
>
wrote:
I recall that agreements were forwarded by current project
members.
I'm
not
certain that we covered all the people who contributed to the
original
project.
Regards,
Alan
On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
To the best of my knowledge this is all finished - Craig
helped out
with it. I forwarded all the formal statements from all
previous
committers that they fully agree and support of transferring
all of
their work to the ASF 2.0 license.
Craig, could you please clarify if there's anything else that
needs to
be
done?
Thanks!
Les
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]
>
wrote:
On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:44 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
I think most people in the Shiro community would agree that
we're
long
overdue for our first release ;)
So, to that end, and unless anyone objects, I'm going to
take a
crack
at tagging only what I feel are the most important issues
that
absolutely must be in to 1.0. When I'm done with that, I'd
like to
post to this list again to allow people the opportunity to
speak-up
if
they see something that they think should be included but I
missed.
I'm doing this to help us get a little focus on what should
concretely
define our first release, and to get it out as soon as
possible from
now. Just my opinion, but I think it'd be great if we can
finish
all
the 1.0 issues (if not actually release) by 1 January.
Please let me know if anyone does not agree with this,
otherwise,
I'll
get started as soon as possible organizing the existing
issues.
Sounds great!
The only thing that's hazy in my mind is the LGPL vetting.
I recall
an
effort to obtain permission to relicense the code from the
original
authors
but am not sure if it was completed and all the requisite
permissions
were
properly filed.
Regards,
Alan
