Yep, it did. Just for clarity's sake: every contributor on the old JSecurity project came over as a committer to Apache and each also sent the re-licensing agreement/affirmation at that time.
Cheers, Les On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> wrote: > So, back in July Craig sent out a set of emails from committers in the > project stating that re-licensing for ASF. What I am not sure of is that > this covers *all* the original authors from the JSecurity project before it > arrived at the Incubator. > > > Regards, > Alan > > On Dec 8, 2009, at 6:42 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: > >> Craig, can you please just confirm this so we have a clear record of it? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Les >> >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> If Craig has confirmed that all the original authors from JSecurity have >>> filed a license agreement then I think we're good. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Alan >>> >>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>> >>>> Yep, we're covered. All people who contributed previously to >>>> JSecurity became committers to Shiro. Before joining the incubator, >>>> we all formally (each) agreed to the transfer. >>>> >>>> HTH, >>>> >>>> Les >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I recall that agreements were forwarded by current project members. >>>>> I'm >>>>> not >>>>> certain that we covered all the people who contributed to the original >>>>> project. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Alan >>>>> >>>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> To the best of my knowledge this is all finished - Craig helped out >>>>>> with it. I forwarded all the formal statements from all previous >>>>>> committers that they fully agree and support of transferring all of >>>>>> their work to the ASF 2.0 license. >>>>>> >>>>>> Craig, could you please clarify if there's anything else that needs to >>>>>> be >>>>>> done? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> >>>>>> Les >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:44 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think most people in the Shiro community would agree that we're >>>>>>>> long >>>>>>>> overdue for our first release ;) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So, to that end, and unless anyone objects, I'm going to take a >>>>>>>> crack >>>>>>>> at tagging only what I feel are the most important issues that >>>>>>>> absolutely must be in to 1.0. When I'm done with that, I'd like to >>>>>>>> post to this list again to allow people the opportunity to speak-up >>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>> they see something that they think should be included but I missed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm doing this to help us get a little focus on what should >>>>>>>> concretely >>>>>>>> define our first release, and to get it out as soon as possible from >>>>>>>> now. Just my opinion, but I think it'd be great if we can finish >>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>> the 1.0 issues (if not actually release) by 1 January. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please let me know if anyone does not agree with this, otherwise, >>>>>>>> I'll >>>>>>>> get started as soon as possible organizing the existing issues. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sounds great! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The only thing that's hazy in my mind is the LGPL vetting. I recall >>>>>>> an >>>>>>> effort to obtain permission to relicense the code from the original >>>>>>> authors >>>>>>> but am not sure if it was completed and all the requisite permissions >>>>>>> were >>>>>>> properly filed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> > >
