If Craig has confirmed that all the original authors from JSecurity have filed a license agreement then I think we're good.

Regards,
Alan

On Dec 7, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:

Yep, we're covered.  All people who contributed previously to
JSecurity became committers to Shiro.  Before joining the incubator,
we all formally (each) agreed to the transfer.

HTH,

Les

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> wrote:
I recall that agreements were forwarded by current project members. I'm not certain that we covered all the people who contributed to the original
project.


Regards,
Alan

On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:

To the best of my knowledge this is all finished - Craig helped out
with it.  I forwarded all the formal statements from all previous
committers that they fully agree and support of transferring all of
their work to the ASF 2.0 license.

Craig, could you please clarify if there's anything else that needs to be
done?

Thanks!

Les

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected] >
wrote:

On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:44 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:

I think most people in the Shiro community would agree that we're long
overdue for our first release ;)

So, to that end, and unless anyone objects, I'm going to take a crack
at tagging only what I feel are the most important issues that
absolutely must be in to 1.0. When I'm done with that, I'd like to post to this list again to allow people the opportunity to speak- up if they see something that they think should be included but I missed.

I'm doing this to help us get a little focus on what should concretely define our first release, and to get it out as soon as possible from now. Just my opinion, but I think it'd be great if we can finish all
the 1.0 issues (if not actually release) by 1 January.

Please let me know if anyone does not agree with this, otherwise, I'll
get started as soon as possible organizing the existing issues.

Sounds great!

The only thing that's hazy in my mind is the LGPL vetting. I recall an
effort to obtain permission to relicense the code from the original
authors
but am not sure if it was completed and all the requisite permissions
were
properly filed.


Regards,
Alan





Reply via email to