Bernie, Nice post. See comment below.
/Ed
Bernie Baymiller wrote:
<snip>
OEMs will continue to insinuate clubmakers use poor quality clones, but as more and more golfers see the great variety of heads, shafts and grips which are made and perform as well or better, those insinuations may come back to bite them you know where.
Evidentially some of the OEMs feel that some component clubs are state of the art. I heard that one of the forums has a thread going about the new Cleveland Halo hybrid being a clone of the Wishon 321LI. I know that Cleveland R&D tried to buy one, was told that Wishon only sells to clubmakers, and Cleveland said that they would get one through another channel. Those who have seen both clubs say that it is quite clear where the Cleveland design came from.
